Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
10-05-2008, 07:08 PM #1
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 55
Now Wall Street may shun $700bn bail-out
Now Wall Street may shun $700bn bail-out
James Doran, New York The Observer, Sunday October 5 2008
Fears are mounting that many Wall Street banks and financial firms will refuse to participate in the US government's $700bn bail-out package, leaving global markets and world economies in a perilous state for months to come.
'There is a growing feeling that banks ... might instead decide to tough it out,' said Thomas Caldwell, chairman and CEO of Caldwell Financial, a $1bn-plus fund manager.
For the past two weeks all eyes in the market have been focused on US Congress and its attempts to pass Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's bail-out package - a bill to allow the US government to buy up to $700bn of toxic mortgage-related assets from American banks, which would in theory free the credit markets and set the gears of global commerce spinning once more.
Last Monday, after the bill was thrown out by the House of Representatives, more than $1 trillion was wiped off the value of US stocks as the market was gripped by panic. The bill was passed on Friday afternoon, however, after the inclusion of $149bn of tax breaks and strict rules for participating banks.
But Wall Street analysts, believe the addition of so many terms to the bill might deter potential participants.
One of the least attractive elements is a section designed to curb executive pay at banks that participate in the bail-out package. These include limiting stock-related pay and banning 'golden parachutes' for executives.
'I think this hodge-podge of regulations and rules will be enough to put many [chief executives] off participating,' Caldwell said.
Sources close to Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch indicated the banks might choose not to participate in the bail-out as there is a growing view on Wall Street that the market may be bottoming out.
Analysts also believe that the mere presence of the government as buyer of last resort will be enough to get credit markets moving again, and that a large number of banks would not need to take part for the legislation to succeed.
Wall Street ended its worst week in seven years with another tumble on Friday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down more than 157 points on Friday at 10,325.38.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008 ... et.bailout
-
10-05-2008, 07:18 PM #2
So....bottom line is that they will only accept it if there are NO conditions...we should just GIVE them the money????????????????
Sounds just like Mexico accepting OUR money!!!!!!The difference between an immigrant and an illegal alien is the equivalent of the difference between a burglar and a houseguest. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
10-05-2008, 07:21 PM #3AprilGuestOne of the least attractive elements is a section designed to curb executive pay at banks that participate in the bail-out package. These include limiting stock-related pay and banning 'golden parachutes' for executives.
'I think this hodge-podge of regulations and rules will be enough to put many [chief executives] off participating,' Caldwell said.
Sources close to Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch indicated the banks might choose not to participate in the bail-out as there is a growing view on Wall Street that the market may be bottoming out.
-
10-06-2008, 02:41 AM #4
GOOD. WE CAN USE THE MONEY FOR SOMETHING ELSE. LIKE WE COULD REBUILD ROADS AND BRIDGES, PAINT AND FIX UP SCHOOLS AND OTHER PUBLIC BUILDINGS. WE COULD BUILD A HIGH SPEED RAIL SYSTEM. THIS WOULD CREATE GOOD PAYING JOBS AND FEED OUR ECONOMY.
SOME OF THE MONEY COULD BE USED TO LEND TO FIRST TIME HOMEOWNERS TO START BUYING UP ALL THE VACANT HOUSES. WHY DO WE NEED WALL STREET? 700B? THATS ENOUGH FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO START THEIR OWN BANK.Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
10-06-2008, 10:34 AM #5AprilGuest
THere you go , sounds good to me Pony!
-
10-06-2008, 12:15 PM #6AprilGuestOriginally Posted by grandmasmad
-
10-06-2008, 12:27 PM #7working4changeGuestOriginally Posted by April
-
10-06-2008, 01:21 PM #8
Re: Now Wall Street may shun $700bn bail-out
Quote:
"But Wall Street analysts, believe the addition of so many terms to the bill might deter potential participants.
One of the least attractive elements is a section designed to curb executive pay at banks that participate in the bail-out package. These include limiting stock-related pay and banning 'golden parachutes' for executives."
So they don't want limits on golden parachutes for the same snakes who have run our economy into the ground while profiting personally. These bums deserve jail time.Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
10-06-2008, 01:40 PM #9AprilGuest
Re: Now Wall Street may shun $700bn bail-out
Originally Posted by Populist
Larry Fink: Migration Is Bad for Productivity and Wealth
05-03-2024, 08:42 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports