Thread: Anti-Lockdown Stanford Professor: "Academic Freedom Is Dead"

Anti-Lockdown Stanford Professor: "Academic Freedom Is Dead"

FRIDAY, NOV 25, 2022 - 02:15 PM
Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

A Stanford Professor who challenged the orthodoxy of lockdowns has warned that “academic freedom is dead,” and that all those who have stood up to the regime narrative now face “a deeply hostile work environment.”



Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, an author of the Great Barrington Declaration in which thousands of scientists called for a policy of herd immunity over lockdowns, warned that “When you take a position that is at odds with the scientific clerisy, your life becomes a living hell.”
Speaking at the Academic Freedom Conference at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business recently, Bhattacharya, who previously described lockdowns as the most catastrophically harmful policy in “all of history,” and “the single worst public health mistake in the last 100 years,” noted “we have a high clerisy that declares from on high what is true and what is not true.”
Watch:



(2431) Climate Science and Biomedical Sciences with Lomborg, Bhattacharya, Ioannidis, and Diffenbaugh - YouTube




Jay Bhattacharya
@DrJBhattacharya
·
Follow

This weekend, I will be appearing with Prof. John Ioannidis at a conference on academic freedom at Stanford. The conference organizers invited professors who disagreed with us to participate in the session, but they declined. 1/3

5:48 PM · Nov 3, 2022



Jay Bhattacharya
·
Nov 3, 2022

@DrJBhattacharya·
Follow

Replying to @DrJBhattacharyaSome of those pro-lockdown professors have complained that there are people at Stanford talking to each other at Stanford with whom they disagree. At least one pro-lockdown reporter took to Twitter to create some sort of scandal around this fact. 2/3




Jay Bhattacharya
@DrJBhattacharya
·
Follow

The conference will be publicly live-streamed. I am at a loss to understand why there are reporters and Stanford professors who object to free speech on campus on issues of public concern. Everyone is free to disagree. 3/3

cli.stanford.edu
Academic Freedom Conference
Academic freedom, open inquiry, and freedom of speech are under threat as they have not been for decades. Visibly, academics are “canceled,” fired, or subject to lengthy disciplinary proceedings in...

5:48 PM · Nov 3, 2022

In a further interview with Fox News, Bhattacharya noted “The basic premise is that if you don’t have protection and academic freedom in the hard cases, when a faculty member has an idea that’s unpopular among some of the other faculty – powerful faculty, or even the administration … If they don’t protect it in that case, then you don’t have academic freedom at all.”
Bhattacharya and thousands of other academics and scientists were initially vilified for damning lockdowns, but have since been vindicated as the societal and medical toll of the shutdowns has been revealed.
Bhattacharya said of the declaration, “The purpose of the one-page document was aimed at telling the public that there was not a scientific consensus in favor of lockdown, that in fact many epidemiologists, many doctors, many other people – prominent people – disagreed with the consensus.”
The professor then described how proponents of the declaration were systematically frozen out of discussions and debates.
“If Stanford really truly were committed to academic freedom, they would have… worked to make sure that there were debates and discussions, seminars, where these ideas were discussed among faculty,” he urged, adding that “power replaced the idea of truth as the guiding light.”
“So you have somebody like Tony Fauci who says unironically, that if you question me, you’re not simply questioning a man, you’re questioning science itself,” Bhattacharya further noted, adding “That is an exercise of raw power, where he places himself effectively as the pope of science rather than a genuine desire to learn the truth.”
“They systematically tried to make it seem like everyone agreed with their ideas about COVID policy, when in fact there was deep disagreement among scientists and epidemiologists about the right strategy,” the professor asserted.
Bhattacharya has also called on new Twitter owner Elon Musk to “expose the government censorship regime,”:



Jay Bhattacharya
@DrJBhattacharya
·
Follow

The single most important step that twitter could take to promote free speech is to release all the correspondence between twitter censors and government officials these past 3 years. Expose the government censorship regime, @elonmusk!



Elon Musk
@elonmusk

Replying to @BillyM2k
The more I learn, the worse it gets. The world should know the truth of what has been happening at Twitter. Transparency will earn the trust of the people.

11:58 PM · Nov 23, 2022

Bhattacharya’s comments come as a new analysis of federal and state data revealed that for the first time a majority of Americans dying from COVID were at least partially vaccinated.
“Fifty-eight percent of coronavirus deaths in August were people who were vaccinated or boosted,” the Washington Post reports in a piece headlined ‘Covid is no longer mainly a pandemic of the unvaccinated’.



(2431) It's back. - YouTube

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here. Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, we urgently need your financial support here.

Anti-Lockdown Stanford Professor: "Academic Freedom Is Dead" | ZeroHedge

“Academic freedom is dead,” says anti-lockdown Stanford professor

Tuesday, November 29, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

2,300VIEWS




(Natural News) Not everyone who works at a college or university is or was in favor of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) lockdowns and other tyrannical measures. Those who dared to speak out, though, now face “a deeply hostile work environment,” according to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.
A professor at Stanford University and one of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) – check out our earlier coverage to learn more about the GBD – Bhattacharya remains an outspoken opponent of covid lockdowns. And for holding this position, he has certainly paid a price.
“When you take a position that is at odds with the scientific clerisy, your life becomes a living hell,” Bhattacharya says, adding that “academic freedom is dead” when it comes to expressing independent thought as a professor or faculty member in higher education.
Speaking at the recent Academic Freedom Conference, which was held at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business, Bhattacharya reminded listeners that he believes covid lockdowns to be the most catastrophically harmful policy in “all of history.” He also called them “the single-worst public health mistake in the last 100 years.”
“We have a high clerisy that declares from on high what is true and what is not true,” Bhattacharya further stated.
You can watch Bhattacharya’s speech at the conference below:



(2571) Climate Science and Biomedical Sciences with Lomborg, Bhattacharya, Ioannidis, and Diffenbaugh - YouTube

Bhattacharya invited professors who disagree with them to also speak, but none agreed

Prof. John Ioannidis also spoke at the conference, as did numerous others who oppose covid tyranny. Academics who support covid tyranny were also invited to give their side of the story, but none agreed to participate.
“The conference organizers invited professors who disagreed with us to participate in the session, but they declined,” Bhattacharya tweeted.
“Some of those pro-lockdown professors have complained that there are people at Stanford talking to each other at Stanford with whom they disagree. At least one pro-lockdown reporter took to Twitter to create some sort of scandal around this fact.”
Bhattacharya says he is truly perplexed that those on the other side of the argument are so against actually presenting their case. He also wonders why they continue to oppose freedom of speech about this issue.
It turns out that the pro-lockdown narrative cannot be supported by science, which is why those who hold it refuse to engage in healthy debate with their opponents. They also know their argument quickly shatters when challenged, which is why they want to muzzle and silence those who stand against lockdowns.
“The basic premise is that if you don’t have protection and academic freedom in the hard cases, when a faculty member has an idea that’s unpopular among some of the other faculty – powerful faculty, or even the administration,” Bhattacharya said in a separate interview with Fox News. “If they don’t protect it in that case, then you don’t have academic freedom at all.”
Early on, Bhattacharya and his colleagues faced intense opposition. Their careers were threatened, and yet they held strong. Now, their positions have been vindicated as the societal and medical toll of all that covid tyranny is becoming undeniably apparent.
“The purpose of the one-page document was aimed at telling the public that there was not a scientific consensus in favor of lockdown, that in fact many epidemiologists, many doctors, many other people – prominent people – disagreed with the consensus,” Bhattacharya added about the GBD.
“If Stanford really truly were committed to academic freedom, they would have … worked to make sure that there were debates and discussions, seminars, where these ideas were discussed among faculty,” he continued, adding that “power replaced the idea of truth as the guiding light.”
The latest news about covid can be found at Plague.info.
Sources for this article include:
Infowars.com
NaturalNews.com


“Academic freedom is dead,” says anti-lockdown Stanford professor – NaturalNews.com