Yes it is good we can keep a sense of humor!!! :lol: Especially since they are trying to steel our money that should be going for our childrens education!!!
Printable View
Yes it is good we can keep a sense of humor!!! :lol: Especially since they are trying to steel our money that should be going for our childrens education!!!
Ok that is the best call ever...coffee hurts when it comes out the nose....I should call and ask what his hat size is....
For a Sombrero and Turbine
butterbean, I was shocked myself. Maybe because I've emailed her a zillion times. :D
This is what I'm seeing on the list:
Alabama: Sessions; Shelby
Georgia: Chambliss; Isakson
Kansas: Roberts
Kentucky: Bunning; McConnell
Louisiana: Vitter
Mississippi: Lott
Missouri: Bond
North Carolina: Burr; Dole
Oklahoma: Coburn; Inhofe
South Carolina: DeMint; Graham
South Dakota: Thune
Tennesee: Alexander; Corker
Wyoming: Enzi
That's twenty Pledges to vote NO. Maybe there are 23 telling their constituents no but not pledging to Numbers. I don't know. I've emailed them can't figure it out. Maybe I'll call.
Oh man!
For those that need a 30-60 sec break take a look here. *Warning explicit language*
http://www.dreamact.info/forum/about2228.html
PS they are now going after Kyl.
I am listening to cspan while I'm doing my emails. Senator Reid from Nevada is back on cspan. I wonder if he will start talking about his friend "Tommy" again.
WHEW! WELL - BACK TO WORK ON MY EMAILS.
I forgot all about Harry's imaginary friend, Tommy! I'm sure we'll hear about Tommy before too long.Quote:
Originally Posted by butterbean
I've been waiting all my life for these kind of people to move into the United States. It really classes us the place, doesn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogger
OK I talked to NumbersUSA. It was a webmaster err. They have 20 NO pledges against the amendment. HOWEVER, Durbin has introduced a new amendment 2919 it changes the language and puts and age cap on it at 30 plus years. It's still amnesty. He spoke with William and clarified with him what is going on.
Maybe we'll get more from William.
There are more Senators who have said they will vote NO BUT they will not confirm with Numbers which is critical. Keep calling say you are against the NEW AMENDMENT 2919 WHICH IS NO BETTER THAN 2237.
Ok, comparing the list I posted to the one posted by Gogo, the following have been removed.
Martinez
McCaskill
Cornyn
LET'S HAMMER THESE FLIP-FLOPPING TRAITORS!!!
Is that little Tommy he met at the Minnesota Airport? :DQuote:
I forgot all about Harry's imaginary friend, Tommy! I'm sure we'll hear about Tommy before too long.
Mike Church has been pounding this on his Sirius show this afternoon. Telling everyone to call..
Change your talking points to amendment 2919
We saw that comming, the amendment is in trouble.Quote:
HOWEVER, Durbin has introduced a new amendment 2919 it changes the language and puts and age cap on it at 30 plus
keep calling!!! WE ROCK!!!
[/quote]Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogger
That's right but its still amnesty and they still want chain migration. When I called Cochran's office the aide didn't know about 2919
They just don't get "we the people" of the United States do not owe an education to anyone who comes in here. This is not about hatred it is about our U.S. children coming first, it is about our tax money going for our children as it should, because it is our money and our country, sorry but thats just the way it is!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogger
They think of it as them alone (1) person not in the context of we the citizens subsidizing thousands of people for a higher education, please why do you feel like we owe you, because your irresponsible parents brought you here illegally, and then on top of that we pay full tuition for our American kids to go to an out of state college. (Out of state NOT Out of country)
It sure is and now we must work even harder to defeat the shell game that may sway a few Senators.Quote:
That's right but its still amnesty and they still want chain migration. When I called Cochran's office the aide didn't know about 2919
AMEN, SOSAD, AMEN!!Quote:
Originally Posted by SOSADFORUS
Does anyone know? Are they voting?
WAFFLING SENATORS MOST NEEDING CALLS
The senators in this first list voted NO on the Comprehensive Amnesty in June, but have not yet pledged to vote NO on the DREAM Act amnesty.
Phone them by contacting the Senate switchboard at 202-224-3121.
Alaska: Murkowski, Stevens
Arkansas: Pryor
Colorado: Allard
Florida: Martinez
Idaho: Crapo
Indiana: Bayh
Iowa: Grassley, Harkin
Kansas: Brownback
Louisiana: Landrieu
Maine: Collins
Michigan: Stabenow
Minnesota: Coleman
Mississippi: Cochran
Missouri: McCaskill
Montana: Baucus, Tester
Nebraska: Nelson (Ben)
Nevada: Ensign
New Hampshire: Sununu
New Mexico: Bingaman, Domenici
North Dakota: Dorgan
Ohio: Brown, Voinovich
Oregon: Smith
South Dakota: *Johnson
Texas: Cornyn; Hutchison
Utah: Hatch
Vermont: Sanders
Virginia: Warner, Webb
West Virginia: Byrd, Rockefeller
Wyoming: Barrasso
This is not altogether correct either. Martinez DID vote for amnesty in June and would be again if this were a stand alone bill. His offices have been saying for 4 days now that they he would vote no for the DoD bill if anything related to immigration were attached to it.
They are voting on the Webb amendment!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Gogo
Webb Amendment is being voted on now, if it passes it could be a piosion pill for the entire bill.Quote:
That's right but its still amnesty and they still want chain migration. When I called Cochran's office the aide didn't know about 2919
You should post that over there..Quote:
Originally Posted by SOSADFORUS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ex_OC
That's so right! If they really wanted to be good citizens they would go to their legal friends and employers and ask them to sponsor them so they could go back to their country and enter legally. OH NO, not that. I'll have to wait in line like everyone else. I'M SPECIAL MY PARENTS DID IT TO ME. GIVE ME A PASS. Then join the military for 10 years honorably then ASK and we'll probably say yes.
Senator Crapo's office just told me he doesn't support the Dream Act attached to the DoD in any way. I asked about the change of lanuage in 2919 and he seemed confused he didn't know about that and that's when he told me he is against it.
Good Lord, a couple of them are going all 'emo'. In particular one who made the not too bright decision to marry and illegal alien and now she is mad because he doesn't have amnesty. She doesn't know how much more she can take, etc., etc. :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by butterbean
I'm pretty sure they will see it here, they seem to know alot about us and what is going on here , I do hOpe they realize I am very sincere about it to. Since I have a friend who's child is THOUSANDS OF $$$$ IN DEBT FROM HIS EDUCATION!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by BrightNail
What is the Webb amendment Bulldogger?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogger
WEBB amendment was not passed.
Webb ammendment did not pass.
What would it do?Quote:
Originally Posted by April
and what does that mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by April
It was for the troops to spend as much time at home as they do in Iraq so in other words if they came home, they would spend the same amount of time here before they could get sent back!Quote:
Originally Posted by BrightNail
Sorry I am late, but here and on the phones!!!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gogo
Troops would have more time between deployments.
ThanksQuote:
Originally Posted by April
It was a Democrat push to force a major change in the Iraq War policy. The change in deployment would have depleted field troop strenght and so jeopardized the troops safety in the field, that it would inevitably lead to a withdrawl.Quote:
Originally Posted by SOSADFORUS
All I can say is I LOVE Mozilla Firefox. I have four and five sites going at once and keeping them going and getting info. Windows is a dud after using this for the amnesty fights. It takes a little bit to get use to but once you have it, its great.
OK their offices are closed now right. They close at 6:00 p.m.
They are doing all this voting now, aren't they going to debate the Dream Act? :evil: