Originally Posted by TexasBorn
Also, I would still like to go back to O'Reilly's comment that Fox News debunked the BC theory last year and has officially closed their investigation.
1) Last year Fox news requested proof of Obama's Hawaiian birth and were sent some kind of "proof". Question is, what did they receive? Short form? Long form? If short form, SURELY this would not have been accepted as proof by Fox amid the vast amount of calls asking for the long form. It would be very alarming and disheartening if the Fox network had succumbed to the Dems. demands that the news networks halt all this talk of a BC conspiracy. This would be the end to ANY member of the MSM as being honest and as O'Reilly was fond of saying..."Looking out for the folks..."
2) How was it that Fox News could acquire something that nobody else seems to be able to get their hands on?
Lastly, the nagging question that will always haunt us is this.... if the Obama administration went so far as to post this short form (albeit of questionable authenticity) on the internet as "proof", why is it that they couldn't just as easily have posted the "long form" as "proof"? In other words, they could just have easily posted the long form and doctored it as they reportedly did to the short form. It just doesn't add up. And now, Hawaiian officials come forward and say that they are holding irrefutable proof of Obama's birth in Hawaii. What is one to believe... is EVERYONE being completely duped, including our independent news networks? In an effort to be as completely objective as I can, it is easy to see how the average person could look at what's before them and conclude that we indeed ARE wacko conspiracy theorists. Why shouldn't they? Where is the proof that our President isn't what he says he is? The point being, people rely on the media to help them sort out the truth. If objective and honest media disappears, the average person is doomed to believe what they are being told, right or wrong.