No, didn't read it. That was my opinion...Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
Printable View
No, didn't read it. That was my opinion...Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
Oh, oh, oh, here we go!Quote:
Originally Posted by Associated Press
Isn't it a bit early in the script for the takeover bid? The nationalization of health care is not a done deal (yet). The Copenhagen Climate Change (one world government) treaty is still two months away. To speculate that a blanket amnesty for 12 million, 20 million, 35 million, or however many millions of illegal aliens show up for roll call when Acorn whistles, would clear Congress before Christmas recess is iffy indeed.
Could Mr. Obama possibly imagine that he has the necessary head of steam to declare martial law and grab for the whole bag of marbles? Or does the CFR's schedule for 2010 constrain him to act before the situation is ripe?
Our hopes for discovery of evidence to disqualify him on Jan. 26 may be preempted if he does his power play before Christmas.
PRAY. PRAY. PRAY. And then PRAY some more, as though your life depends upon it. It very well may, so PRAY. PRAY. PRAY.
Lord God, heavenly Father, in Jesus' name we pray that You hear from heaven, and forgive our sins, and heal our land. God save America, and these honorable patriots, and cause the United States to fulfill Your purpose in our days here and in Your time.
Could it be the Carter case has not yet been dismissed and he feels it is now or never?
Link to the Carter case's hearing transcript
http://www.scribd.com/full/21189922?acc ... o3bs6cpk3m
Thanks Freedom, I have read the entire transcript and it was very enlightening. IMO, both Dr. Taitz and Gary Kreep made sound arguments but I was most impressed with Dr. Taitz on the issue of standing. I think this was a critical and impassioned plea to the court. I would have a hard time believing that Judge Carter would not allow this case to go forward based upon the arguments from both sides.Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomFirst
My concern is with the amount of time that has lapsed since the hearing with no ruling. If he allows it to go forward, there is very little time for the massive amounts of discovery Dr. Taitz will need.Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasBorn
TexasBorn, I am requesting permission to quote Dr. Taitz's argument for standing,
from pp. 79 ff. of the Scribd.com Keyes|Barnett v. Obama transcript.
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/9...ckobamassn.jpg
This Social Security Number, originally registered in 1890, was mentioned in her
arguments by Dr. Taitz ("ai" pronounced as a long "i" preceded by a slight "ah").
21 : the number of "no discovery" days that U.S. District Judge David O. Carter
has had the DoJ motion to dismiss Barnett v. Obama under submission.
Minuteman, if this is indeed true, and Obama has used multiple SSN's, it boggles the mind that we elected this kind of person to POTUS. I would certainly hope that Dr. Taitz team has done their homework on this as it is potentially devastating information once released to the public.Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
Regarding the delay by Judge Carter...it makes one wonder who he might be having a conversation with.
Did you read Obama Nation by Jerome Corsi, Ph. D., published in mid-2008, before the election?Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasBorn
Literacy tests are unconstitutional, but Obama Nation should have been required reading for anyone to cast a vote for Barack Obama.
With so many people being sheep, I think there is something the the hypnotism accusations.Quote:
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
http://www.internet-grocer.net/hypnosis.pdf
http://www.hypnosisblacksecrets.com/cov ... techniques
http://www.beachwoodreporter.com/politi ... notist.php