Dan Hazelwood - a top Republicans Strategist and voter mail expert
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dan Hazelwood [mailto:DanH@targetedcreative.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 7:12 PM
To: xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Did you originate this e-mail?
Not me.
-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxxxxx
To: Dan Hazelwood <DanH@targetedcreative.com>
Sent: Thu May 21 17:33:07 2009
Subject: Did you originate this e-mail?
Dan,
The following clipped e-mail appears to be from you. Did you originate this e-mail, and is the report accurate?
=======
This is a long, but hugely significant piece of information
For those of you who are following the story about President Obama's possible ineligibility to be president by virtue of his inability to present a simple birth certificate, you may want to pay very close attention to what is happening in several states, but most notably in Rhode Island.
As a brief introduction to what is occurring, let me start by reminding anyone who isn't aware of this that there are a multitude of lawsuits filed in several state and federal courts that challenge Obama's right to be president. These challenges are based upon the Constitution's requirement that a person aspiring to be president must be a natural born citizen, which means he/she must be born in the United States.
Exceptions to this have been allowed by the U S Supreme Court when a possible presidential aspirant is the child of a United States military officer who, while stationed overseas or outside the continental United States, had a child born in the location in which they were stationed. This is exactly Senator McCain's story. His father, A United States Naval Commander, was stationed in Panama when John McCain was born. So although John McCain was not born in the continental United States, he was nevertheless eligible to run for president due to that Supreme Court ruling. I think the same is true (I may be incorrect in this) concerning Franklin Roosevelt.
There appear to be valid questions concerning Obama's right to be president due to a variety of factors (such as being an Indonesian student at a time when Indonesia prohibited any non-native born Indonesians from attending their schools - the upshot being that since Obama attended school in Indonesia, he had to be recognized as a valid Indonesian citizen; and the fact that at a time when the United States Department of State was not only not issuing passports or visas for American citizens to travel to Pakistan, they also prohibited all non-government officials from traveling there, yet Barack Obama managed to enter that country - the point being that he could only have done so with a passport or visa issued by another country), but the most compelling question is his inability to provide a simple birth certificate. After all, you can provide yours. Why can't he? All Obama needs to do is present a birth certificate, and the controversy is ended.
Adding fuel to this fire is the fact that a team of Obama lawyers have fought every lawsuit and inquiry in court, thus far managing to stop every effort. It is estimated that at least $600,000 has been spent on attorney fees for Obama's lawyers to fight the lawsuits. Why is that necessary if there is a birth certificate?
The consensus among leading politicians is that this fight has little to no chance of victory, so that is why you never hear about this on talk radio or television newscasts.
Until now.
I personally was totally ignorant of what I am about to relate, but apparently there is an implied provision in the fifth amendment to the Constitution which allows any group of citizens to form a grand jury at will for the purpose of hearing the facts of an issue and, following a vote confirming a consensus that there is sufficient evidence to indict, present their indictment to a state or federal court (this process is called a "presentation"). The officer of the state/federal court must then frame an indictment and present it to the accused so he/she may respond. Since I have no knowledge of law and am therefore on very shaky legal grounds, I think this means that the accused must respond and answer the citizen grand jury indictment.
Apparently I may be right because there are already three citizen grand jury indictments against Obama by three separate groups that have been presented to state courts. They are an Arkansas citizen's grand jury, a Texas citizen's grand jury, and another group calling itself the American Grand Jury. These three groups are acting independently and totally without federal or state guidelines.
Except Rhode island.
And herein lies the significance and power.
A Rhode Island man named Mike Mandeville has taken this process a dramatic step further. He has formed a Citizen's Grand Jury right inside a Rhode Island courthouse and having a state judge swear in the Citizen's Grand Jury for the purpose of deliberating the potential charges concerning Obama's possible ineligibility to be president. They are then going to debate the case before state officials and, if in their opinion, there is a preponderance of evidence that Obama is ineligible for the presidency, to have the state of Rhode Island bring an indictment against him.
That takes the legal case concerning Obama's possible ineligibility into a much higher dimension that cannot be ignored.
Before I stumbled onto this, I didn't know that we, as independent citizens, have the Constitutional right to form a Grand Jury. Like everyone else, I thought a Grand Jury required county, city, state, or judicial authority.
Although embryonic, this has the potential of a political and Constitutional earthquake leading to the most serious Constitutional crisis in our nation's history. If Obama is indeed ineligible for the presidency, then every Congressional bill signed into law by him is invalid. Indeed, every action taken by him is invalid. The banking system takeover, the Chrysler/GM takeover, the Stimulus bill, and all other actions are invalid.
Moreover, if he is ruled ineligible, is Joe Biden also ineligible? Or does he become president? Is the 2008 election invalid? How is the case settled? By the Supreme Court? If the Obama/Biden presidency are invalid, do we have another election, or does Nancy Pelosi become president? There are an almost endless number of Constitutional questions, so this is an extremely serious matter.
For those of you who want to explore this further, go to
www.americangrandjury.org. <http://www.americangrandjury.org./> There you will find not only details on this story, but four links to help you understand the history and powers of Citizen Grand Juries. The information contained in these links are long, detailed, and most informative. The links you will see are entitled:
1) Grand Jury History Powers
2) Rules Evidence Indictments
3) Grand Jury Forms Ettiquette
4) The Court: How to File
This is an interesting development.
Dan Hazelwood
=============