Latest from Mario re: Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro
31 Jul 2010:
Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro - Passport Application File - Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release - FINAL - 7-29-10.
Documents in this file are out of order. This file indicates via the 1965 amendment application numbered P3 in this file that Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama had a passport prior to 1965 and she was applying to amend it since she got married to Lolo Soetoro in March 1965. Since they were good for 5 years that means she likely got her first passport as early as in late 1960 of early 1961. Why, likely to be able to travel to Kenya to have the baby over there.
Also in this passport applications file are revealed the exact date of her marriage to Lolo Soetoro. But as everything with this family, nothing is consistent. In 1965 she says she married Lolo Soetoro on March 15, 1965. But in a later passport renewal application she states she married him on March 5, 1964. Either way, Obama could have been legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Hawaii at age 5 or under given these marriage dates and his birth records in Hawaii, fraudulently created by grandma Dunham in 1961, could have been amended to show that new legal name of Barry Soetoro. And then Obama could have later re-amended them back to put his name back to Barack Hussein Obama II.
When the original and complete birth records file for Obama going back to and including Aug 1961 and all subsequent amendments are released it will likely be very damning to Obama's self created nativity narrative and story of his early life. Children legally adopted at age 5 and under have their new citizenship governed by the Hague Convention Treaty of which the USA is a signatory. That is likely why Obama alludes to his being age 6 when those Indonesian records are discussed in regards to when his step-father "adopted" him.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35161730/Stan ... AL-7-29-10
For more details on this lawsuit see:
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
Are all of the federal judges now scofflaws also?
SHOULD JUDGE SUSAN BOLTON HAVE HEARD THE ARIZONA IMMIGRATION LAW CASE?
by jtx
Date: Aug. 1, 2010
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/01/ ... laws-also/
John Marshall was Secretary of State under President John Adams as well as the longest-serving Supreme Court Chief Justice, serving as such from 1801 to 1835.
(Aug. 1, 2010) — I’ve recently sent a couple of emails to Governor Jan Brewer of AZ with the last one reading:
[i]I’ve emailed you before that Judge Susan Bolton acted in violation of Article III of the Constitution in the dispute between the US and AZ which – per the black letter law of our land – should have been taken up under the original jurisdiction of the US Supreme Court (not the Federal District Court).
Certainly Judge Bolton should have known this and acted accordingly. Since she chose to ignore the law, I would urge you to seek sanctions or impeachment of the judge, as clearly a simple reprimand is not sufficient.
In fact, since the preponderance of evidence now shows that we now have someone who has never shown himself to be legally eligible to hold the office he now occupies, I would urge you not only to seek a SCOTUS hearing of original jurisdiction on the SB1070 matter, but to ALSO ask SCOTUS to furnish the appropriate rulings/orders to seek discovery of complete early life records on Obama to include not only his original 1961 long-form birth certificate but the many other documents that may (or may not) support that information. Clearly you have standing to do that since if not legally eligible to hold the office, any laws or other orders the man gives are null and void – including his actions vs. AZ.
I – and MILLIONS of other Americans – believe this man is not legally eligible under Article 2, Section 1 of the US Constitution and should be required to comply with the Constitution which says “shallâ€