[quote=MinutemanCDC_SC]Last one, and then we return to our topic: challenging Mr. Obama's eligibility for office. K?Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
[/quote:6y20wqvx]Quote:
Originally Posted by [url=http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1216821&page=2552]On July 18, 2010, at forums.hannity.com, bluecat6[/url]":6y20wqvx][size=7]"Competent authority" seems to be the term of the week by Obots. A fews ago it was something different and before that something different. Having trouble with [a] term that has meaning are we?
Lets not forget that Obama started his career by manipulating and attacking the basic rules of elections. He did it by invalidating his opponents on technicalities. Even those opponents [who] were fully authorized by "competent authorities" to be on the ballot. Our "system" of voting and electioneering rules are based on personal honor and personal integrity. It is not designed to be iron-clad in its application and control. It is fragile. At the beginning, Obama and his backers such as Bill Ayers showed they care nothing about honor. They wanted what they wanted. Honor and integrity as it was known in the 18th century be ----.
So they ruthlessly and viciously eliminated the competition using technicalities to invalidate petition signatures. A cheap, dirty, methodical, non-honorable tactic. This goes beyond honor and lack of respect for the fragile system of US elections. It shows a purposeful willingness to manipulate the system by Obama... and his backers who were known radicals and in many cases foreign entities.
So Obama was willing to attack and change the decisions of "competent authority" to wipe out his competition in 1996. His challenge was without honor or respect for the system. The current challenges are completely out of respect and honor to the US system of politics - one that completely relies on integrity and honor.
[url="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/index.html
You don't think these comments are related to Obama's eligibility?
I would submit that in addition to his being ineligible to be POTUS because of his not being a natural born citizen, that we also must look at the preferred style of cheating and fraud he used to get into office. To me, the cheating and fraud is criminal behavior, and is also an indication that Obama is ineligible to be POTUS. We don't elect known and identified criminals to the highest office in the land.
So, we take a man who may not have legally become a senator from Illinois because of election fraud, and we look at the evident and rampant election fraud detected in the 2008 national elections that made him the assumed POTUS, and come to the realization that he may not have been legally elected POTUS because of election fraud.
How's that old saying go... if it looks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, chances are it's a duck.
So, where do we go to pursue federal crimes? Oh, I forgot - the FBI. Those are the same executive branch law enforcement officials who will NOT investigate candidates background because the candidates have been 'elected by the people.' Everything associated with election crimes goes into the white bucket because that's an area the FBI doesn't have a category for pursuing. Where the hell is J. Edgar Hoover when we really need him?
It would appear that federal election crimes are simply NOT enforced at any level by any law enforcement agency. No wonder the commies are in power. There is no firewall of defense to stop them from taking over our system of government.
This whole situation tells us that this takeover of our government is not we, the people's fault, because we were asleep or being irresponsible - it is simply criminal behavior perpetrated on us by our federal and state governments, and by our unelected ruling elite. These criminal acts nullify the whole election and in fact, nullify the whole federal government, and probably some of the state governments as well.
If this were in France in the 1790s, heads would roll - literally.
I have been preaching for months that the whole federal government needs to be nullified and then dissolved because this is NOT our government. It is NOT the federal government the states created in the 18th century. It has evolved into a criminal organization of elected and unelected criminals and thugs that is designed to fleece the people of their property and their work efforts. No more, no less. It's a criminal business.
The article by Stanislov Mishin pretty well sums what happened to America. http://www.scribd.com/doc/36707617/Stan ... -a-Whimper
The Russians get it. The Brits get it. The Israelis get it. The Dutch get it. What the hell is wrong with us that WE don't get it? Why are we having these discussions? Why aren't we simply shutting down the federal government?
What is holding us back?