http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...;v=JEzY2tnwExs
Printable View
ACORN VOTER FRAUD
OBAMA'S ACORN EXPOSED PART 1 OF 2 - YouTube
OBAMA'S ACORN EXPOSED PART 2 OF 2 - YouTube
Obama ACORN 2012 Agenda - YouTube
Part 1 ACORN Voter Fraud 2008 Presidental Election by Anita MonCrief - YouTube
Part 2 ACORN Voter Fraud 2008 Presidental Election by Anita MonCrief - YouTube
2007-12-01 Obama Acorn Speech - YouTube
ACORN Obama and the Bailout - YouTube
ACORN REBRANDING TABLE
ACORN Housing Corp. changed its name to Affordable Housing Centers ofAmerica Inc.
State-level chapters that have incorporated as new nonprofi t corporations:Arkansas: Arkansas Community Organizations
California: Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE)
Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island: New England United for JusticeDistrict of Columbia, Maryland: Communities United, Communities UnitedTraining and Education Fund
Louisiana: A Community Voice
Minnesota: Minnesota Neighborhoods Organizing for Change
Missouri:Missourians Organizing for Reform & Empowerment (MORE)
New York: New York Communities for Change
Pennsylvania Neighborhoods for Social Justice (PNSJ) andPennsylvania Communities Organizing for Change (PCOC)
Texas: Texas Organizing Project and Texas Organizing Project EducationFund
Washington: Organization United for Reform (OUR) Washington
http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1304376160.pdf
Obama Campaign Gears Up For Massive Voter Fraud
July 7, 2012 By Kris Zane 47 Comments
inShare17
Charlie Rangel, flanked by high-level Democrats, recently strutted up to the microphone declaring himself the winner against Hispanic opponent Adrian Espaillat in the race for New York’s 15th Congressional District. At least until his opponent discovered that polling places were illegally asking voters for ID, were turning away pro-Espaillat voters, and even were reporting zero votes to suppress the counts.
What a shocker: Charlie Rangel was involved in massive voter fraud and intimidation.
No one is surprised, really. Far-Left “Progressive” (i.e., socialist) Democrats have been involved in these tactics for years. Like Obama, Rangel was endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America in 1996. Like Obama, Rangel has deep ties to the unions and Alinsky (ACORN-style) groups that are the shock troops of voter fraud.
Imagine if the tactics used in the Rangel/Espaillat race were used on a national scale. Where the entire Democratic National Committee (DNC), all the major unions, and all the “Progressive” groups were engaged in a massive voter fraud and voter intimidation campaign.
Well, we don’t have to imagine it as this is what occurred in 2008 with Obama supporters during the Democratic Primary, as countless poll workers, Hillary Clinton supporters, and simple bystanders extensively reported.
And the mainstream media did what they do best and ignored it.
Now imagine all the previous groups banded together with the power of the Obama presidency, the power of the DOJ, the power of all aligned city governments, etc., involved in a repeat of what we witnessed in 2008.
We will have an attack on our election process that makes the ballot stuffing and intimidation of 2008 look like child’s play.
Do we think Eric Holder is running around the country blathering about the evil of voter ID laws because he cares about minority voters? Holder is nowhere to be found when Espaillat, a Hispanic, is calling foul.
The Obama campaign and Eric Holder’s DOJ are gearing up for a tidal wave of voter fraud and intimidation that will drown this country with a corrupt election beyond resuscitation.
Both Obama and Eric Holder need to be impeached before this can occur.
Obama Campaign Gears up for Massive Voter Fraud
Minn. Lawmakers to Hire Law Firm in Voter ID Case
http://KAALtv.com/kaalimages/reposit...PHOTO%20ID.pngST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) - Top Minnesota lawmakers have approved an $18,000 legal expense in a fight to preserve a constitutional amendment that would require voters to show a photo ID at the polls.
The expense was approved Thursday on a divided voice vote by the Republican-led panel of senior House and Senate members. The taxpayer money will go to a private law firm that will seek to intervene in a lawsuit on the Legislature's behalf.
A lawsuit filed weeks ago contends that the language of the November ballot question doesn't accurately describe what the amendment would do. Plaintiffs argue passage of the amendment could weaken their voting rights. Supporters of the amendment say it's meant to protect voter fraud.
The Minnesota Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the case on July 17.
KAALtv.com - Minn. Lawmakers to Hire Law Firm in Voter ID Case
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- A federal judge has refused to stop Florida from removing potentially non-U.S. citizens from its voter rolls.
The U.S. Department of Justice sued the state to halt the purge, arguing it was going on too close to a federal election.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle said Wednesday that there was nothing in federal voting laws that prevent the state from identifying non-U.S. citizens even if it comes less than 90 days before the Aug. 14 election.
Hinkle ruled that federal laws are designed to block states from removing eligible voters close to an election. He said they are not designed to stop states from blocking voters who should have never been allowed to cast ballots in the first place.
Gov. Rick Scott praised Hinkle's decision, saying "irreparable harm will result if non-citizens are allowed to vote."
Judge Refuses To Block Florida Voter Purge
Voter Purge Efforts Likely to Spread After Florida Victory in Database Case
Saturday, 14 Jul 2012 08:44 PM
By Newsmax Wires
Florida election officials will have access to a federal database to help purge its voter rolls of non-citizens under an agreement reached between state and federal officials and welcomed on Saturday by Florida's Republican governor. Florida and federal officials have been battling over access to the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database for several weeks. Florida filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security to gain access to the database. The state was hit by a lawsuit from the U.S. Justice Department seeking to stop the purge.
Now other states are expected to ask for access to the database so they too can check their rolls. Some state governments have sought access to the federal database for years. Federal officials told Washington state back in 2005 they saw no way to compare voters and the Homeland Security information.
Colorado has sought the federal data for a year. The Centennial State, which has a Democratic governor but a Republican secretary of state, Scott Gessler, has identified about 5,000 registered voters that it wants to check against the federal information.
Officials in the politically competitive states of Ohio, Michigan, New Mexico and Iowa — all led by GOP governors — are backing his efforts.
Gessler said 430 registered voters have acknowledged being ineligible, but an "unenforceable honor system does not build confidence in our elections."
Gessler also is seeking information from jails in 10 of the state's largest counties for persons held on "immigration detainers" since 2010, the Denver Post reported.
Justice Department officials have said the database is not a comprehensive listing of citizens and that state officials failed to hand over key information to cross-reference the listing.
"We've already confirmed that non-citizens have voted in past elections here in Florida," Gov. Rick Scott, who has spearheaded the purge effort, said in a statement welcoming the agreement.
"Now that we have the cooperation of the Department of Homeland Security, our state can use the most accurate citizenship database in the nation to protect the integrity of Florida's election process.
Scott's attempts to purge the voters' list is popular in Florida. A Tampa Bay Times/Miami Herald/Bay News poll released on Saturday showed 54 percent of Floridians in favor with 35 percent against. Republicans supported the measure by 80 percent to 13 percent.
Florida state officials have said they are examining a list of nearly 180,000 possible non-citizens and have forwarded the names of nearly 2,700 registered voters to local election officials seeking confirmation of their citizenship status.
Supporters of the purge say it aims to protect the integrity of voter rolls. Critics say the effort relies on faulty information and risks disenfranchising legitimate voters.
"No matter what database Florida has access to, purging voters from the rolls using faulty criteria on the eve of an election could prevent thousands of eligible voters from exercising their rights," said Jonathan Brater, a lawyer with the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law. "Florida must use a more transparent and accurate process, and must leave enough time for voters targeted for removal to be notified and correct errors," he said.
The agreement was signaled in a July 9 letter sent by Alejandro Mayorkas, director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, to Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner.
The letter informed Detzner that the database would become available to state election officials once a memorandum of understanding is agreed to by both parties over its use.
Detzner applauded the agency's decision in a letter to local election supervisors on Saturday.
"Florida voters are counting on their state and federal governments to cooperate in a way that ensures elections are fair, beginning with ensuring the voter rolls are current and accurate," Detzner said.
"We now have a commitment to cooperate from DHS and we look forward to a partnership that improves the integrity of our election process."
The agreement to grant Florida access comes just over two weeks after a federal judge in Tallahassee rejected a request by the Justice Department to prevent the state from proceeding with its voter purge.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle said his ruling was based in part on assurances from Florida election officials that they would not forward any more names to county elections supervisors based on the previous list of 180,000 people.
That list was drawn from drivers' license and voter registration records and had proven to be inaccurate.
Read more on Newsmax.com: Voter Purge Efforts Likely to Spread After Florida Victory in Database Case
Who is Behind the Voter Participation Center?
26 Jul
The Voter Participation Center is a project of the parent organization, Women’s Voices Women Vote. Page Gardener is paid handsomely, $190,000 per year to run this organization that sends pseudo voter registration forms to cats, dogs, felons, illegals, gerbils and the deceased, according to their IRS Form 990.
http://disruptthenarrative.files.wor...pg?w=645&h=362Source: Guide Star
So who else is on this ‘non-partisan’ board of directors?
First off is John Podesta, the former Clinton White House Chief of Staff and one of the founders of George Soros’ Center for American Progress.
Yeah. That SCREAMS non-partisan.
How about this board member? Avis Jones-DeWeever, Executive Director of the National Council of .... Really? I thought that the NAACP name was bad enough, but apparently in some contexts the use of the terms ‘Colored People’ and ‘Negro’ are perfectly acceptable within the left wing community.
They’ve got an app for that, I guess.
How about William McNary? Have you heard of him? I hadn’t.
William McNary is the President of USAction, the largest network of...McNary is also Co-Executive Director of Citizen Action/Illinois. The Illinois affiliate of USAction; CitizenAction/Illinois is the states largest consumer watchdog group working on an ambitious agenda, which includes health care reform, environmental safety, utility reform, public education funding and campaign finance reform. For twelve years he served as the Legislative Director for the states largest public interest organization.How about this other non partisan board member, Mimi Mager?
Mimi MagerHow about Chris Dresser? Actually, her bio in unintelligible, but here it is.
Mimi Mager contributes over 20 years of experience in public servic...Mager joined the firm in 1995 and became a principal in 1997. Before coming to the firm, Mager served four years as Director of Congressional and Federal Affairs for Mayor Sharon Pratt Kelly of the District of Columbia. During her tenure, the District achieved a historic increase in the federal payment, an unprecedented emergency supplemental appropriation, and a reversal of the congressional-imposed prohibition on the use of District funds to provide abortions for low-income women.
From 1987 to 1990, Mager worked for the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, where she designed and implemented the grassroots legislative campaigns that culminated in the enactment of the Civil Rights restoration Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Fair Housing Act Amendments, the American Disabilities Act and the defeat of the nomination of Judge Robert Bork to the Supreme Court
Claire Silberman is also on the board. She a NY Yenta who donates big dough to Democrats that are too numerous to screen capture. Just go here for a sense of it.
So there’s your non partisan Voter Participation Center/ Women’s Voices Women Vote.
Oh and just one other thing.
Nobody on the board but Page Gardner gets paid to push out these phony voter registration forms to goldfish and iguanas. She’s the plantation owner and the board appears to be immunerated with the same false promises that they’ve always fallen for.
So there you have it. Women’s Voices Women Vote/Voter Participation Center is a non-partisan group and I just proved it.
http://disruptthenarrative.com/2012/07/26/who-is-behind-the-voter-p...
Soros Election-Rigging Scheme Collapses
A George Soros-backed scheme that paved the way for Al Franken’s 2008 theft of a U.S. Senate seat has collapsed months ahead of the critical November elections. Rumors of the death of the Secretary of State Project had been circulating for months. Michael Kieschnick, co-founder of the Secretary of State Project, confirmed that his group has shut down in an interview at the recent “Take Back the American Dream” conference in Washington, D.C.
Although the so-called 527 political committee “still exists” on paper, “2010 was terrible so we’ve switched our efforts,” said Michael Kieschnick wearing a tee shirt reading “ORGANIZER” in block capital letters. Section 527 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code allows the group to accept unlimited financial contributions.
The idea behind the Secretary of State Project was that in most states the secretary of state runs elections and that a relative pittance can help swing these little-watched state contests, allowing even small donors to play a big role in installing a powerful state official who can tilt the playing field in favor of Democrats.
The writing had been on the wall for the Secretary of State Project. The group’s website, secstateproject.org, is currently offline after vanishing from the Internet in July of last year. Its Facebook page, YouTube channel, and Twitter account hadn’t been updated since 2010. The group hadn’t endorsed any candidates for the 2012 election cycle and its most recent IRS filings show almost no financial activity since the 2010 election cycle.
The Secretary of State Project’s signature achievement was helping to elect the unethical Saul Alinsky-inspired community organizer Mark Ritchie. Ritchie is the radical, ACORN-loving Minnesota secretary of state who orchestrated Al Franken’s theft of incumbent Republican Norm Coleman’s U.S. Senate seat in the 2008 election cycle. Before that Ritchie was president of the Minneapolis-based Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. In 2000 he supported Ralph Nader’s candidacy for president.
Soros and progressives all across the fruited plain believe with a religious fervor that right-leaning secretaries of state helped the GOP supposedly steal the presidential elections in Florida in 2000 (Katherine Harris) and in Ohio in 2004 (Ken Blackwell).
The SoS Project endorsed secretary of state candidates who took the position that voter fraud is a myth; that voter suppression is widely and solely used by Republicans; that it’s a waste of time to remove obviously fraudulent names from voter rolls; and that legal requirements that voters show photo identification somehow discriminate against racial minorities.
Soros Election-Rigging Scheme Collapses | FrontPage Magazine
Federal Court: Obama Appointees Interfered With Prosecution in New Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case
- Posted on July 30, 2012 at 7:28pm by http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cd3a19f...6%3Fs%3D17&r=G Jason Howerton
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...PM-270x195.png(Source: YouTube)
A federal court in Washington, D.C., ruled last week that a number of President Obama’s political appointees within the U.S. Department of Justice did in fact interfere with the prosecution of two New Black Panther party members who were videotaped holding a night stick and intimidating voters outside a Philadelphia voting station back in 2008.
Thus far, both Attorney General Eric Holder and the Justice Department have denied the involvement of political leadership in the case, something that is now being called into question.
The conservative legal watchdog group Judicial Watch previously sued the DOJ in federal court regarding Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests pertaining to information surrounding the New Black Panthers case. As a result of the lawsuit, the group was able to obtain a number of withheld documents and are now suing the DOJ for attorney’s fees, the Washington Examiner reports. More importantly, as a result of their motion, a federal judge ruled against the DOJ.
The Washington Examiner has more:
Obama’s DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorney’s fees since “none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in” how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a “series of emails” between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:“The Court’s decision is another piece of evidence showing the Obama Justice Department is run by individuals who have a problem telling the truth,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “The decision shows that we can’t trust the Obama Justice Department to fairly administer our nation’s voting and election laws.”
“The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.”
…
“In sum, the Court concludes that three of the four fee entitlement factors weigh in favor of awarding fees to Judicial Watch. Therefore, Judicial Watch is both eligible and entitled to fees and costs, and the Court must now consider the reasonableness of Judicial Watch’s requested award.”
Following a brief investigation into the 2008 New Black Panthers Case, the Department of Justice filed charges. However, the Panthers didn’t respond and a federal court in Philadelphia entered a “default” against all the defendants.
Enter Obama.
Shortly after he became president, the DOJ quickly backpedaled and the charges against three of the New Black Panther party members were dropped and a fourth was let off with a restraining order.
Watch the video of the New Black Panther party members holding a billy club and intimidating voters outside Philadelphia polling station here:
Federal Court: Obama Appointees May Have Interfered With Prosecution in New Black Panther Voter Intimidation Case | Video | TheBlaze.com
ACORN REBRANDING TABLE
ACORN Housing Corp. changed its name to Affordable Housing Centers ofAmerica Inc.
State-level chapters that have incorporated as new nonprofi t corporations:Arkansas: Arkansas Community Organizations
California: Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE)
Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island: New England United for JusticeDistrict of Columbia, Maryland: Communities United, Communities UnitedTraining and Education Fund
Louisiana: A Community Voice
Minnesota: Minnesota Neighborhoods Organizing for Change
Missouri:Missourians Organizing for Reform & Empowerment (MORE)
New York: New York Communities for Change
Pennsylvania Neighborhoods for Social Justice (PNSJ) andPennsylvania Communities Organizing for Change (PCOC)
Texas: Texas Organizing Project and Texas Organizing Project EducationFund
Washington: Organization United for Reform (OUR) Washington
http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1304376160.pd
HOW TO PROTECT THE VOTER COUNT!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 3_xFb1sWKU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZp3rA1X ... r_embedded
For more info on Election Fraud and how to fight it go to:
True The Vote
BECOME A POLL WATCHER OR AN ELECTION JUDGE:
http://vote.nyc.ny.us/pdf/documents/boe ... ersguide.p
http://www.elections.il.gov/downloads/e ... judges.pdf
Obama To Grant Amnesty To Illegals Before Election DayAugust 4, 2012 by Tim Brown
Obama To Grant Amnesty To Illegals Before Election Day
Barack-Obama-Cannot-Get-Congress-To-Pass-Amnesty-For-Illegal-Immigrants-So-Now-He-Is-Just-Going-To-Ram-It-Down-Our-Throats-Any-Way-That-He-Can Barack Obama has already said he is not going to enforce the law of the land concerning illegal immigrants, which should make him eligible for impeachment, among other charges. But even as I write this article the Obama administration is preparing to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants by the end of the month. It will just cost them $465.
ABC News reports, using the term “undocumented worker” to refer to illegal immigrants to be politically correct,
The Department of Homeland Security today announced details of the application and approval process for the DREAM Act-like program, outlining specific eligibility requirements and a $465 fee. It will begin Aug. 15.
Illegal immigrants younger than 30 who came to the United States before age 16, have lived here for at least five years continuously, attend or have graduated from high school or college, and have no criminal convictions are eligible to submit requests for so-called deferred action (legalese for an official exemption from deportation).
The administration said documentation provided by each applicant will be reviewed individually on a case-by-case basis at one of four service centers run by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service. It’s unclear how long each review will take, but some immigrants are expected to receive temporary legal status before Election Day.
While the “dreamers” will not obtain a path to citizenship or the right to vote, Obama’s policy shift – circumventing Congress with executive action – has been widely seen as a politically motivated nod to Hispanics who have long sought the change.
No! Really? a polically motivated nod by this adminstration? I”m shocked! Of course it’s politically motivated.
Janet Napolitano claimed this was a process of compassion and common sense. In a statement, Napolitano said,
“Our nation’s immigration laws must be enforced in a firm and sensible manner. But they are not designed to be blindly enforced without consideration given to the individual circumstances of each case.
Nor are they designed to remove productive young people to countries where they may not have lived or even speak the language. Discretion, which is used in so many other areas, is especially justified here.”
The problem is that they are not enforcing immigration laws and Barack Obama stood in the Rose Garden and declared that he wasn’t. Now we find the administration is going to punish one of their own for doing just what she is talking about: enforcing immigration laws.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith put his finger on what the real issue is when he said,
“Today’s deferred action guidance is another example of how the president’s policies put the interests of illegal immigrants ahead of the interests of U.S. citizens and legal immigrants.”
“On the same day the unemployment rate rose to 8.3 percent, the Obama administration announced a requirement for illegal immigrants to apply to be able to work in the U.S. The administration’s guidelines don’t just encourage illegal immigrants to work in the U.S., they actually require them to apply to do so.”
Exactly right Mr. Chairman. Now stop him. You guys are Congress after all and you are the ones that make law, not the President.
Not only is Obama looking to stack the deck with illegals, but he’s also making a quick buck at it. I’m wondering just where that $465 per illegal is going to end up. Isn’t anyone else curious?
Read more: Obama To Grant Amnesty To Illegals Before Election Day : Freedom Outpost
ILLEGAL ALIENS CAN VOTE, MILITARY CAN'T?
By J.B. Williams
August 7, 2012
NewsWithViews.comWhy is the Obama Campaign trying to disenfranchise military votes and at the same time, trying to make sure that illegal aliens remain on state voter rolls? Why are both political parties pandering for the Latino vote? Can illegal aliens vote now? The answer is yes, but I’ll get to that in a minute.As Obama’s so-called Department of Justice sues numerous states to block military votes from being counted in the upcoming November election, they are also suing states to keep them from purging known illegal voters from voter registration files.Just in case you needed iron-clad proof that Obama’s Democrat Party is as anti-American as Stalin’s Russia, this should do it for you. Directing the DOJ to use all of its power to block the vote of men and women who pay with their blood for every right to vote, while at the same time demanding that people not even in the U.S.A. legally, have their votes counted. That should cover any questions you might still have about Obama’s anti-American agenda for change.And as usual, the good ole ACLU is engaged in protecting the illegal alien vote, but they are nowhere to be found in the fight to protect the military vote. There’s no link for the ACLU defense of the military vote, sorry.How much more do the American people really need to see?If you think this is a new strategy from Democrats, think again. Most people remember when Al Gore tried to keep recounting Florida hanging chads until he could defeat George W. Bush in 2000. What they might not remember, is the Gore campaign also tried to disenfranchise the overseas Military vote while counting those hanging chads. They may not remember it because the American press failed to report it and unless you read foreign news publications like the London Telegraph, you wouldn’t know.In 2004, confirmed traitor John Kerry (D) was under attack from fellow “Swift Boat Vets” and he too, tried to make sure the military vote was squashed in his bid to unseat George W. Bush.For decades, the Military vote has trended heavily in favor of Republicans with up to 80% of active duty soldiers supporting the Party with a history of supporting them, the Republican Party. Even after Democrat efforts to dismantle or at least weaken the Military, almost 70% have voted Republican in recent elections, Bush 64% - Kerry 15% ---- McCain 66% - Obama 25%.That’s all you need to know when asking why Democrats want to disenfranchise the Military vote. Soldiers don’t vote for anti-American Marxists…We also know why Democrats pander for the Latino vote, even mandating temporary Amnesty for Illegals from the Oval Office ahead of the election, when members of congress know better than to support Amnesty for Illegals ahead of the election.But why are Republicans also pandering for the illegal alien vote? Yes, not just the Latino vote, but the illegal alien vote…YES, Illegal aliens CAN vote in our elections, illegally, of course. But who cares about the law these days?First, the government refuses to enforce our existing immigration laws, or even allow Border States like Arizona to enforce those laws in their own states.Second, because our federal government has allowed millions of illegal aliens to take up residence in the United States and the 14th Amendment is interpreted as a fast-track to citizenship via so-called “anchor baby” statutes, many states are issuing driver’s licenses to illegal aliens so that they can obtain auto insurance.With a 14th Amendment birth certificate and a photo I.D., such as a driver’s license, they can register to vote.In addition, Democrat Motor-Voter laws make it possible for illegal voters of all types, illegal aliens, felon voters, dead voters, duplicate voters, etc., to register and vote on the same day, before anyone can even begin to verify the credentials of the newly registered.According to Democrats, “Republicans want to disenfranchise Democrat voters.” In reality, American taxpayers want to disenfranchise people who are not legally eligible to vote in our elections to begin with.The only voters Democrats want to disenfranchise are members of our Military, who pay for every American right to vote with their blood. You can’t make up insane stuff like this and you can’t get any more Un-American than this.
Before American taxpayers can even hope to win the November election or save their Constitutional Republic, they will have to secure the integrity of the election itself. To do that, they must address at least four high priority items in every local community and they have very little time to do it.
1. Make sure that EVERY Military vote is counted in every district
2. Make sure that NO illegal aliens are voting anywhere in the nation
3. Make sure that NO unconstitutional candidate ends up on the ballot with Romney
4. Unify and galvanize voters to remove Obama-Clinton from office at any costUnless patriotic Americans engage at their local level to make sure the November election is as legitimate as possible, there is no chance they can defeat the unethical and illegal acts of Democrats in 2012 or any time after.You can work with and on behalf of the Military at Veteran Defenders of America, and with other American Patriots at The Patriots Union.Unite with others to fight these evils, or there is no way to win…
JB Williams -- Illegal Aliens Can Vote, Military Can't?
America Is My Name
The greatest danger to American freedom is a government that ignores the Constitution
Thomas Jefferson, Third President of the United States
Fellow Americans:
The American way to help people is to empower them to become independent.
The Obama/UN/European/Communist/Marxist way to help people is to make them dependent on the Government.
In November you decide. A vote for Obama is a vote for you to become a dependent slave.
The fastest way to conquer people is to divide them into small manageable groups.
Divide and conquer is a technique that Evil uses to break large groups into small manageable groups.
The assault is on the American Middle Class. The goal is destruction of the middle class by destroying Rights for Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. The reason is that the American middleclass must be destroyed is because:
the largest voting block in America,
is able to gain wealth
most important, to gain land
Evil can never leave the American middle class in tact because it would be a role model for all other countries. Evil wants American wealth, land and resources. The Wealth of America is its people. In America, We the People own the land. OOPS, under communism and Obama's program, "Individual property rights will have to take a back seat for the good of the collective.", Harvey Ruvin, (communist ideology) Maimi-Dade Clerk of Courts, UN ICLEO, Marco Rubio appointee. We the People won't own anything. America is the ONLY free county left in the world and Americans are at the last intersection. We can only turn right or left - not R or D. We must determine, do we want to be Free or Slaves? The answer is with We the People.
70-80% of Americans are awaking up. We have recently seen that Americans are becoming engaged but how far does that engagement go? Yes we will walk to the local Chick-fil-A to show our support of Freedom of Speech but what is next? Do we vote the same criminals into office because they have the most money and we are too lazy to check anyone out.
Protection of our constitution protecting our Rights granted by God are the only real jobs of an elected official regardless of whether at the federal, state or local level.
Recently I asked a prospective candidate if he knew what separation of church and state meant and where it could be found in the Constitution.
His answer was: I guess that means we have to take all mention of God and prayer out of our schools. I could find separation of church and state in the first amendment.
I asked him when was the last time he looked at the constitution. He said, "what to I need to read that for? I am not running for a federal office."
I could not believe what I heard.
Separation of Church and State IS NOT in our constitution. It is a phrase that has been made up by the communists to keep morality out of the government and schools. Communists are atheists. (not all atheists are communists but all communists are atheists.) With morality and responsibility gone our children are subject to drug, sex, bullying, emotional indoctrination, political indoctrination, religious indoctrination and will continue to go on shooting sprees to fulfill their purposefully misdirected adrenaline rush.
Our founding fathers incorporated God into all of our public documents and charged us to never lose sight that we must be guided by morality not greed.
Today we have lost sight of that charge. Our public officials believe it is OK to lie and We the People feel it is OK not to challenge those lies. We have learned to abdicate responsibility just like our children are being taught in school. We have been led down the path to forget the truth by accepting anything a politician says because, "it just politics or it's just business, it's not personal." We teach our children to lie by accepting the lies of our elected officials under the guise of "Political Correctness." By using the right terminology a studient in college will learn how to indoctrinate people through "education", how to use persuasion and propaganda in marketing class, how to manipulate data in science, calculate on machines in math, how to lie in government class and how to ignore the constitution by using case law. This is all incorporated into restrictive monitored moves and responses under the guise of saving the environment. Our illerate students learn how to use their emotions, shift responsibility, lie, cheat and steal. Some but very few succeed. We have allowed the socialist academia experts, who never set foot in the real world, destroy our children, our future. That is our biggest problem.
The fight we are experiencing now is not new. There are and will always be good vs evil, individualism vs communism. However, Americans should be taught:
the ideology of America - provide the individual America with the right tools and they will work together with other exceptional Americans to be the best they can be and create incredible advances for humanity.
Not taught to depend on the government where Individual Rights and Freedoms and private property will take a back seat for the good of the collective in slavery.
The great secret of America is its people. The question is: Are Americans awake enough to sacrifice or is it still too inconvenient?. Napoleon Hill, in is his book, Think and Grow Rich, said that in order to achieve great wealth, you must be willing to sacrifice. Americans wealth is each and every individual, will you sacrifice?
We are many; they are few. Yes, about 10,000 total people in the world are the psychopaths running this show: IMF, CFR, Fed Reserve, Bilderbergs, Club of Rome, Tri-Lateral Commission, UN. They are determined in their ideology to destroy humanity under the guise of saving humanity. They care nothing about individuals. "The death of one is a tragedy, the death of many is a statistic", Stalin. Their only thought about man is how much work man can do for them. They feel that We the People are their HUMAN Capital and only the able body should survive to serve them. If you are not able you die. People are nothing more than live robots capable of doing the bidding of the Evil Elite. Shame on us for allowing them get this far, to rule.
America is the richest land mass in the world. Yet few Americans understand that the land and resources belong to We the People, not the Evil Elite. We accept their lies as policy and ignore those telling the truth because fiction is easier to handle than truth. We have allowed ourselves to participate in these lies because it is easier than to admit we have been duped. We have allowed the so called Elite to rule and have accepted their laws because tolerance is better. Better than what? Better than accepting the challenge of paying attention and saying, NO.
We know all of the environmental issues are based on fraud and yet we watch and accept rules and regulation without challenge because it is easier. We watch them destroy the minds of our children, steal our homes, healthcare, our money, our jobs, freedom and liberty, our land, our resources and our constitution. We allow programs to be initiated with no logic or reason knowing they will fail. We let them poison our water, close our fisheries, farms, energy in the name of the environment when not one scientific study has shown any validity. Instead we eat food from uninspected farms in foreign countries, so we can give them our money in the name of spreading the wealth. We accept bills destroying the constitution, written and passed in the dead of night, read by no one. We watch as criminal legislators sign away more of our rights, sovereignty and money while we who are trained to say nothing, just accept lie after lie, fraud after fraud. In the end, we will live in ghettos called sustainable developments with implanted tracking devices watching our every movement (in the Obamacare bill). Is this the 'Freedom" you want to leave your children?
Our Founders recognized that Freedom and Liberty were not negotiable and that Land Ownership and Freedom can never be separated. Our founding fathers knew that this representative republic (not democracy) would only stand if the people were in control as free, equal willing participants verifying everything dealing only with the truth. The day Ruth Ginsberg slammed the constitution, was the day she should have been removed from the bench. The Wall Street and government criminals should be in jail for participating in the economic housing fraud, TARP, shipping our jobs and dollars overseas to people who want us dead, stealing our land and resources. The fact that they are not, indicates how deep this fraud really is.
What do we do? Every American has the power to make a difference while we still can. You saw the power of Americans as we expressed our voice of support for the owner of Chick-fil-A. By the strength of the numbers we must realize Americans, we are not alone. Exceptional Americans getting with exceptional Americans can and will make a difference. But only if we are willing to sacrifice. Are you? There are only two ways to "take America back" by force or by money. Since money will not kill anyone, let's do that first.
1. Be dedicated to Truth, Education and Conversation. If everything we know is based on lies and we know that communism preaches the ends justify the means, look for and call out the lies. End Political Correctness. Once you start talking to people you will find you have a lot more in common than you think. For a group and share knowledge. branch out and get others.
2. Wall Street is a fraud and is designed to wipe you out. It is just a matter of time before the collapse. Get your money out of big banks and out of Wall Street. Form an investment group. Buy some of the foreclosed homes and rent them to people in your community to help preserve what you have. Form an investment club, work with the small business owners in your community to be the angle they need to keep their business open.
If you believe that the government and Wall Street is corrupt, stop playing their game.
If they don't have your money, you won't lose it. Use local community banks. If Obama gets in again, he will wipe out what is left of your portfolio. Their goal is to destroy the market, render you useless, depressed and begging for the government to take control of the banks. Currency will be destroyed and you will be issued your allowance on a debit card. If you are bad your will be punished for you will obey or your card will be turned off.
3. Demand USA food and products from your local establishments. We want Americans working. If we want Americans working, we must demand American made goods and services. Support your local farmers.
4. When was the last time you went to a county meeting? Do you know what your county is spending? On What? Make them accountable, make them stop funding any and all regional programs, land programs, green programs. Make them stop taking training and grants from corrupt federal and state agencies partnered with the UN. Long term centralized planning is a communist Soviet city-state model. It does not work. It does not belong in your community. Stop using international programs like UDC codes.Learn the truth about smart meters, PPP and regional programs all designed to eliminate local government and business through phony environmental issues. Demand accountability.
5. Go to your school board meeting and demand they stop Race to the Top and any federal government programs. These programs are right out of the soviet school to work plans. Charter schools are not the answer, they are PPP and have little or no oversight. Does it matter in what building your child learns communism? These warm fuzzy programs were designed to mask their real intent: track the kids at an early age to determine their ability to work of the state.
Demand a school board that will require a factual, classical American education not international UN sponsored overly expensive socialist programs that indoctrinates your kids how to be an emotionally trigger.
6. Demand your Governor and legislators get the corrupt federal government out of your state. No more phony land purchases with borrowed funds, bad energy programs, burning food for fuel, PPP's.
7. Brush up or learn English. Help your friend or neighbor read if they are having trouble. It is not their fault they were never taught how to read or do math properly. Now is the time to help.
8. Be prepared for any emergency. It is coming. This Evil crowd wants the planet depopulated so they can control less people. Form groups in your community, grow food, be armed (take classes). The non immigration policy is flooding this country with trash, criminals and terrorists. They are here It is just a matter of time.
English is the official language of America and learning English enables Americans to communicate. Learning to read and write keeps men free. Fredrick Douglass
English is the language of business. Without learning English people sign contracts that are left to the interpretation of another, maybe without their best interest. People who can not read English will become slaves.
Evil knows without the ability to read and write English, people can easily be divided. Lies and fear can easily be initiated.
9. Send postcards, emails and make daily calls to your "public servants". Let them know we are watching.
When you find corruption, blast it around all social and local media, blogs, your community, church and group.
This EVIL group running this horror show are a bunch of psychopaths and they care less about you. Fight fire with fire but fight for your rights using the truth. They have no truth and when you site the truth they unravel. Be silent no longer.
Divided We Fail. Refuse to answer any survey or questionnaire that calls for a division. Be an American first and always. All of the other adjectives attached to America are just mechanisms to divide and conquer.
Know who you elect, vet the candidates and check their background. The local and state elections are critical. DC is filled with criminals, perverts, fraud and theft. Our salvation will be the states but only if you choose the right people. America was formed as independent states agreeing to support the rule of law governing all men, a limited government put in place to protect the borders, people and the constitution. Read this post:
At least twice in the last 30 days at local candidate forums, the question has been asked of each candidate participating to name just two of the enumerated powers from Article 1, Section 8, which they thought was the most abused, and what specifically they would do to return to Constitutional government. The deer in the headlights looks were frightening.
One, a sitting State Representative, named the "separation of church and State" as an enumerated power, one named the First Amendment, one said he was not good with numbers and was informed the numbers designated parts of our constitution to which he laughed and said he would have to get out a Ron Paul book.
Here are men and women interviewing for a job and they have no clue or CONCERN for the official description of the job they are campaigning for. In any other business they would have been politely sent home. Why waste your time interviewing someone who has such little regard for the job they are seeking?
And yet we put them back in office. Why? Are we too lazy to look at their history? background, associates? Shame on us, we deserve what we get.
In the months ahead, many groups will come forward with solutions. You are the solution. You are an American, the last free person in the world. Will you give up your freedom and liberty for $1 dollar, $50 dollars, a dinner, a grant, a regional council, a lie? Or will you sacrifice your time, step out of your comfort zone to do what it takes to protect and defend? To educate yourself in the truth?
The first test. Everything is connected. Everything happens for a reason. All American policy and government is based on lies. There is so much information to help you educate yourself it is often overwhelming so here is a great start explaining how all of the connections are made and are being implemented. Listen
The real question is, will you take the first step at learning to learn the truth or are you an apathetic piece of HUMAN CAPITAL satisfied to do the bidding of the Evil Elite feeding you all of the lies, because it is easier?
“The power in the Constitution will always be in the people.” George Washington
We The People can not win if we are not engaged. We the People can not be engaged if we are not educated in the truth. Continue to learn the truth. Join the biggest group of people in the world. AMERICA IS MY NAME.
“All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to do nothing.” Thomas Jefferson
Victory is our only option.
We invite you to join us at Americaismyname.org
AMERICA IS MY NAME - HOME
You will not be required to enter anything except your name on our Operation Paul Revere Newsletter. You will find action plans in our newsletters that We The People can follow to make our voices known.
Americans will no longer be the Silent Majority.
Our requirement is that you are a legal American.
On this site we will relearn and understand the history missing from our schools. Learn why the pieces don't fit or make sense. Who is running the show and why.
Learn why we are in the state we are in. Most important learn what it is to be an American and why we must NEVER give away our Lives, our Liberty and our Sacred Honor.
God Bless You and God Bless America.
Americaismyname.org
info@americaismyname.org
Karen Schoen, AgEnder
Diane Kepus, AgEnder
And the thousands of American AgEnders
agenda21today.com
Voter Fraud is Real: Why the Voting Rights Act Should Be Used to Fight Election FraudElection fraud in America is no laughing matter. Florida election officials have discovered that the state's voter polls have 53,000 dead voters still registered to vote.1 That's a whole city of dead voters still "eligible" to vote – more than the entire population of Pensacola, Florida!
Unfortunately, in some U.S. cities voter fraud has been so common and so pervasive for so long that it's more likely to be a punch line than a felony.In Chicago, for example, when a couple announces the birth of a new baby boy, their friends are all-too-likely to joke: "Is he registered to vote? …Twice?"Then there's that infamous old adage: "Vote early and vote often" – a funny but revealing quip widely attributed to the Chicago gangster Al Capone, a man who epitomized political corruption, and boasted an illegal empire built on graft and intimidation.And by now, of course, it is practically axiomatic that Mayor Richard Daley and Chicago's Democratic political machine stole the 1960 presidential election for JFK.It's safe to say that when it comes to elections, Chicago has a reputation, a history, or, if we're honest about it – a problem.Voter scams and scandals are notorious in Chicago and across much of Illinois, including outdated voter registrations being voted by precinct captains; fake registrations with made-up names; "ghost" voting by the dearly departed; elderly voters having their ballots cast by care-workers; and ineligible felons and illegal aliens casting illegal ballots.
And Chicago's problem isn't just distant history.The Illinois Attorney General's Office recently prosecuted and convicted two Cook County election workers for election fraud for violating voter privacy by "supervising" voters as they completed ballots. In 2002, dozens of Chicago's senior citizens applied for absentee ballots, only to discover that the man who was helping them to apply had already filled in the ballots.
As the Chicago Sun-Times reported, when the seniors asked him what he was doing, he answered: "Don't worry, you're voting Democratic."2Then there's Chicago's interstate rival, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The Milwaukee Police Department was directed to investigate voter fraud that occurred during the 2004 presidential election. In 2008, the MPD task force issued a troubling and extensive report.According to the study, 16 workers from the John Kerry campaign committed felonies that went unprosecuted by Wisconsin authorities.
The task force identified a single property where 128 different people were registered to vote, and each one was signed up for the 2004 election. The report cited cases of double-voting, "ghost" voting by dead people, and uncounted absentee ballots that were discovered only after the election was over and the winner declared. The task force questioned the voter registration practices of a number of homeless shelters, and found homeless individuals registered in multiple locations. With no photo ID required to vote in Wisconsin at the time, anyone could have cast multiple ballots simply by knowing the homeless man's name. As the MPD investigation observed, "vote portability and the abject poverty that defines homelessness, make these unfortunate individuals vulnerable to become the tools of voter fraud by those who would exploit the homeless."3
And let's not forget Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where, during the 2008 presidential election, the New Black Panthers were famously permitted to stand guard in front of the city's precinct polling locations, armed with nightsticks. That was the same election year that CNN reported that 1,500 of Philadelphia's ballots were sent to the U.S. Attorney's Office to be investigated, with another 8,000 considered "suspect."
Then, in 2010, Fox News reported that Bucks County was investigating 500 allegedly fraudulent ballots involving a door-to-door canvassing scheme and forged absentee ballot signatures. And we can add to the list reports of voters receiving letters from the Pennsylvania Voters Assistance Office – an office that doesn't exist.But this is nothing new for the City of Brotherly Love. Philadelphia, like Chicago, is no newcomer to election fraud, as the Philadelphia Inquirer reminds us: "In the 1960s, a Democratic ward leader took shoe boxes full of quarters to the polls in poor neighborhoods – 'to pay off voters,' a veteran election lawyer recalls. In 1993, a judge overturned a pivotal State Senate race because of hundreds of bogus absentee ballots."4And because history so often seems ready to repeat itself, dozens of polling places in Philadelphia's primary elections last year mysteriously recorded more votes in some races than the number of voters who had signed in to vote.
Indeed, Philadelphia commissioners are currently investigating 83 of the city's voting districts where more votes were cast in the municipal primary than the number of people who actually voted.5 As the press explained, "Until they understand what happened, the commissioners say, they cannot rule out the possibility of deliberate, illegal efforts to run up votes for favored candidates, with the perpetrators losing count as they tried to cover their tracks."6The unfortunate reality is that in places like Chicago, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and many other cities across the country, election fraud has been woven into the political fabric of the community, tainting elections, skewing results, disenfranchising legal voters, and compounding voter cynicism for far too long.
Voters deserve better.In 1965, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 with overwhelming majorities in both houses in order to honor America's commitment to count every eligible vote and ensure the franchise to our citizens. As he signed the landmark legislation, President Johnson explained: "Every American citizen must have an equal right to vote. Yet the harsh fact is that in many places in this country, men and women are kept from voting simply because they are Negroes."The Voting Rights Act was needed, as Johnson admonished, because of the schemes and contrivances used to disqualify and suppress the votes and voice of black Americans.
The Negro citizen may go to register only to be told that the day is wrong, or the hour is late, or the official in charge is late, or the official in charge is absent. And if he persists and he manages to present himself to register, he may be disqualified because he did not spell out his middle name or because he abbreviated a word on his application. And if he manages to fill out an application he is given a test. The register is the sole judge of whether he passes his test. He may be asked to recite the entire constitution, or explain the most complex provisions of state laws. And even a college degree cannot be used to prove that he can read and write.
But vote suppression wears any number of disguises. Today, election fraudsters share the same goal as those who denied black Americans their political voice in the early 20th century – to substitute their own preferred candidates and policy initiatives for those of the electorate.The Voting Rights Act empowers the U.S. Department of Justice to combat disenfranchisement and vote suppression, and that authority should be used today to fight election fraud, particularly in places like Chicago and Philadelphia, where the citizens have long suffered the fraudsters' crooked schemes.On the heels of the ACORN scandal, instead of digging in deeper to ferret out more evidence of electioneering fraud, too many at the Justice Department have turned a blind eye and by doing so they are failing to carry out the mission that Congress gave the Department when it adopted the VRA.Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act authorizes the Justice Department to sue in federal court in order to challenge election practices that it has determined are racially discriminatory.
The Justice Department also routinely works with states and municipalities to help them better understand the Voting Rights Act and avoid discrimination in voting, and may even send federal observers to monitor elections to ensure their fairness.Rather than stymie the legitimate and constitutional efforts of states to stop voter fraud, the Justice Department should use that same authority today to take a lead role in combating the equally invidious practices of modern election fraud. It should work proactively with cities and states commonly known to be hotbeds of "election irregularities," and help them to root out political corruption that local election and law enforcement officials are likely to ignore.
Furthermore, Section 8 of the Voting Rights Act provides for the appointment of federal observers within political subdivisions in order to monitor elections in precincts where the Attorney General or the federal courts believe observers to be necessary for a fair election. In some instances, for example, there are concerns about racial discrimination in the voting process. In other cases, federal monitoring helps ensure compliance with bilingual election procedures; or the Department may have information indicating potential violations of other federal voting laws, and one or more DOJ attorneys may be assigned to monitor the election and maintain contact with state and local officials.
Today a vigilant Justice Department would monitor news reports and other sources to determine where and when to interject itself in order to limit the modern versions of voter fraud. Make no mistake, denying an American the right to vote by "harvesting ballots," hiring felons, using "ghosts" or any other type of voter fraud is just as unacceptable today as it was prior to passage of the Voting Rights Act.Section 2 lawsuits and Section 8 monitoring programs under the Voting Rights Act would go a long way toward fighting today's election fraud schemes; schemes that often target the same black voters once deprived under Jim Crow. They would signal a concerted federal and state effort to ensure election fairness and count every vote. Moreover, they would make it clear to would be election law scofflaws, this behavior will not be tolerated and offenders will be accountable.
It is tragic that Attorney General Holder and the Obama Administration's Justice Department apparently continue to place party politics ahead of the integrity of the country's elections by turning a blind eye to voter fraud in states such as Illinois, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, while persistently obstructing state and local efforts to combat corruption in places such as Georgia, South Carolina, and Texas.Election fraud is another name for disenfranchisement – and it's a felony, not a punch line. Regrettably, the Justice Department seems to be in on the joke.
Horace Cooper is an adjunct fellow of the National Center for Public Policy Research. He taught constitutional law at George Mason University in Virginia, was senior counsel to U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Armey and is a founding member of the black conservative leadership group Project 21.
Voter Fraud is Real: Why the Voting Rights Act Should Be Used to Fight Election Fraud
Look who's behind 'Voter ID is racist' campaign
Data called into question, contradicted by group's own report
Published: 2 hours ago
n New York's WABC Radio. Follow Aaron on Twitter and Facebook.More ↓
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/01/120...os-340x170.jpg
TAMPA, Fla. – A radical group funded by billionaire George Soros that has a history of biased research is primarily behind a national campaign to paint voter ID laws as racist.
The voter ID data collected by the group, the Brennan Center for Justice, has been called into question by experts and has been contradicted by other credible studies. Yet the center’s information is cited widely by news media and even members of the Obama administration.
Besides receiving a reported $7.4 million from Soros’ Open Society Institute since 2000, the Brennan Center was also the recipient of grants from the Joyce Foundation from 2000 to 2003. President Obama served on the Joyce board from 1994 through 2002.
Get Aaron Klein’s “Fool Me Twice: Obama’s Shocking Plans for the Next Four Years Exposed,” autographed, at WND’s Superstore!
The Brennan Center is located at New York University School of Law. Its primary focus is so-called voting rights and creating a “living constitution” as well as pushing for a “living wage.”
In November 2006, the Brennan Center issued “Citizens Without Proof,” an extensive report that claimed voter ID policies will disfranchise millions of minority, elderly and low-income voters because those voting blocs are less likely to possess documentation than the general population.
The report is routinely cited by news media and activists seeking to prove voter ID is racist. Just yesterday, MSNBC featured two segments citing the Brennan Center information as evidence the GOP is attempting to block minorities from voting by pushing ID laws.
Articles this week by the Huffington Post, Bloomberg News and the Baltimore Sun also cited the Brennan research.
The National Center for Public Policy Research notes that in its report on voter ID measures, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, or NAACP, “relied heavily” on Brennan Center’s work.
Also last month, Politifact used the Brennan Center’s 2006 report to support Attorney General Eric Holder’s claim that 25 percent of African-Americans lack government-issued photo ID.
GroupSnoop.org, a website run by the National Center for Public Policy Research, recently posted a new profile of the Brennan Center that documents how its voter ID information is highly questionable and may be based on biased data.
In August 2011, Hans A. von Spakovsky and Alex Ingram of the Heritage Foundation critiqued the Brennan report, finding it is “both dubious in its methodology and results and suspect in its sweeping conclusions.”
According to the Heritage Foundation report, the Brennan Center used biased questioning to obtain their desired result concerning minority voters – a result that is actually contradicted by footnotes buried in the Brennan report itself.
“By eschewing many of the traditional scientific methods of data collection and analysis, the authors of the Brennan Center study appear to have pursued results that advance a particular political agenda rather than the truth about voter identification,” write Von Spakovsky and Ingram.
Heritage points out that the Brennan Center’s report was based entirely on one survey of only 987 “voting age American citizens.” However the report contained no information on how the survey determined whether a respondent was actually an American citizen.
Heritage found the Brennan survey used the responses of the 987 individuals to estimate the number of Americans without valid documentation based on the 2000 Census calculations of citizen voting-age population. Those Census figures, noted Heritage, “contain millions of U.S. residents who are ineligible to vote, thus contributing to the study’s overestimation of voters without a government-issued identification.”
Heritage charged the survey questions used in the Brennan Center’s report “are also suspect and appear to be designed to bolster the report’s biased findings.”
Brennan, for example, did not ask respondents whether they had government-issued IDs, but instead asked whether respondents had “readily available identification.”
“By asking whether such ID could be found ‘quickly’ or shown ‘tomorrow,’ the study seems to be trying to elicit a particular response: that those surveyed do not have ID,” noted Heritage.
The Brennan study is undermined by some of its own footnotes.
One footnote states that “[t]he survey did not yield statistically significant results for differential rates of possession of citizenship documents by race, age, or other identified demographic factors.” That footnote appears to contradict the very premise of the Brennan report.
Another footnote relates that 135 respondents “indicated that they had both a U.S. birth certificate and U.S. naturalization papers. This most likely indicates confusion on the part of the respondents.” In other words, Heritage notes, nearly 14 percent of the respondents provided contradictory answers.
The Brennan study further did not ask any of its participants whether they had student or tribal ID cards even though in some states like Arizona and Georgia, such cards are acceptable for the purpose of voting.
Heritage cited numerous studies that directly contradict the Brennan report, studied not widely cited by the news media in the voter ID debate.
Such studies include:
- An American University survey in Maryland, Indiana, and Mississippi found that less than one-half of 1 percent of registered voters lacked a government-issued ID. Therefore, the study correctly concluded that “a photo ID as a requirement of voting does not appear to be a serious problem in any of the states.”
- A 2006 survey of more than 36,000 voters found that only “23 people in the entire sample—less than one-tenth of one percent of reported voters” were unable to vote because of an ID requirement.”
Brennan has a history of questionable research.
His center was at the heart of a national scandal in 2002 after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance act. The attorneys defending McCain-Feingold had reportedly based key portions of their case on research provided by the Brennan Center – research, Discover the Networks notes, that may have been “deliberately faked,” according to Weekly Standard editor David Tell.
Tell quoted Brennan Center political scientist Jonathan Krasno admitting in his funding proposal to the Pew Charitable Trusts that the purpose of his group’s proposed study on campaign finance was for partisan political reasons.
Wrote Tell: “‘Issue Advocacy: Amassing the Case for Reform,’ dated February 19, 1999, explained that `[t]he purpose of our acquiring the data set is not simply to advance knowledge for its own sake, but to fuel a continuous multi-faceted campaign to propel campaign reform forward.’ Dispassionate academic inquiry was so alien to the spirit of the thing that Brennan promised to suspend its work midstream, pre-publication, if the numbers turned out wrong. `Whether we proceed to phase two will depend on the judgment of whether the data provide a sufficiently powerful boost to the reform movement.’”
Tell claimed Brennan researchers “deliberately faked” their results.
Look who’s behind ‘Voter ID is racist’ campaign
Proof this country is run by idiots!!!!!
Scytl currently has contracts with 900 U.S. jurisdictions to count votes
Posted on April 14, 2012
http://eng.jhu.edu/scripts/tinymce/j...s/e-voting.jpg
By Anthony Martin | Conservative Examiner
In a follow up investigation to an earlier report today concerning the outsourcing of vote tabulations for the Nov. 2012 elections in the U.S., this reporter has learned that SCYTL, a Spanish corporation run by a major Obama contributor, has contracted with 900 local jurisdictions in over 14 states to count the votes in the Presidential election.
According to SCYTL’s website, the company’s software will be used to report election results in the state of Arkansas along with 13 other states:“Scytl’s election management subsidiary, SOE Software, has recently been selected by the Arkansas Secretary of State’s Division of Elections to provide its Clarity ENR solution and enhance the State’s web presentation of Election Night Results. With this selection, Arkansas will join over 800 Election jurisdictions in 13 states that leverage the industry leading election results solution. Clarity ENR presents results data graphically through the utilization of maps, bar charts, totals and downloadable reports. Ballot contest and/or issue information may be presented at the state and county level with granular detail provided down to a specific voting precinct. The solution will empower every web visitor with access to user friendly presentation of voting data to include contest details, status of counties / precincts reporting, voter turnout, vote type summaries and more.”In addition, SCYTL has contracted with the state of Virginia to develop new technology that will be used to tabulate absentee and military votes.And in February of this year the state of Connecticut awarded to SCYTL a contract to conduct online poll worker training.Among the states so far that have contracted with the company are Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Arkansas, Connecticut, Washington, Virginia, and West Virginia. The state of New York has contracted with the company to do its overseas vote tabulations.During the 2010 midterm elections, SCYTL ‘modernized’ the electoral process in 14 states:During the midterm elections in November 2010, SCYTL successfully carried out electoral modernization projects in 14 States. The company boasted that a “great variety” of SCYTL’s technologies were involved in these projects, including an online platform for the delivery of blank ballots to overseas voters, an Internet voting platform and e-pollbook software to manage the electoral roll at the polling stations.The states that used SCYTL’s technologies during the Midterms were New York, Texas, Washington, California, Florida, Alabama, Missouri, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, New Mexico, Nebraska, West Virginia and Washington DC.SCYTL technology was the subject of controversy in South Carolina during its 2012 Republican primary. The Ron Paul campaign charged that there were major problems with the process of vote tabulation implemented by local elections officials who had been trained to use the SCYTL platform. There were also reports of numerous technical failures on the part of electronic voting machines.Bev Harris, an elections and voter fraud expert, wrote that the manner in which SCYTL reports election results are very hard to monitor for fraud. According to Harris, a citizen observer would have to be present at the time the polls close to capture evidence of precinct results. Otherwise there is no way to compare the numbers.Harris’ online vote watch venture, BlackBoxVoting, contains a disturbingly lengthy list of an assortment of problems associated with elections and voter fraud in the U.S., including widespread evidence that government officials can now see exactly how an individual citizen voted. The site also delineates how state and local elections officials in certain states routinely mislead the public and outright violate the law.In the South Carolina case, results were tabulated privately, which is against state law. The state requires that the vote count be done openly, in public. But in order to make sure that the SCYTL machines report the accurate numbers, observers must actually see the physical evidence of the vote before the information is entered into the database.Such a requirement may be difficult if not impossible to implement, since many states no longer require a paper backup to electronic votes.South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson sent an official letter to the U.S. Department of Justice to delineate potential fraud in the voting process in the state. Over 900 people who supposedly cast ballots were found later to be deceased.The fact that each state uses its own system and operates according to its own laws would prevent a nationwide scheme to tamper with the 2012 vote. It is therefore impossible under the current system for the Obama Administration, for example, to implement a vote counting system for every precinct in America, although there are government officials who have made it known that they wish to mandate a uniform voting system that would be used in every state. At present, however, the various states and precincts are not capable of such a thing due to economic issues and other logistics.But the fact that the SCYTL system is being used in 900 voting jurisdictions in the U.S. means that the potential for widespread vote tampering, even enough to skew the November election, does in fact exist. According to one political activist who recently presented evidence to a Congressman concerning these issues, the only way for citizens to get something done about preventing potential massive vote fraud in 2012 is to volunteer to be a poll watcher, become a precinct worker, and send the information contained in this article to every local, state, and national politician, along with phone calls and emails to Congressmen, Senators, and state legislators to request investigations.
Source: Examiner.com
*****************************************A side note from Sarah:
I have had several readers ask me what we can do to try and stop this company from gaining control of our election process.
First of all, share this information with family and friends. Then contact your elected officials ESPECIALLY if you are a citizen in one of the states listed above and find out if your jurisdiction is currently using the Scytl electronic voting system. Let your elected officials know about the information uncovered about this company and the potential dangers that may occur if this system was put into place in your area.
Scytl currently has contracts with 900 U.S. jurisdictions to count votes | American Freedom
Good bye ACORN, Hello #Scytl
Posted on April 10, 2012
https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/im...UixrpHlQlnVXJ1
According to an article posted on SodaHead:
In 2008 the Florida Department of State looked into using Scytl’s remote voting system but turned it down. Their reasons:Our findings identified vulnerabilities that, in the worst case, could result in (i) voters being unable to cast votes, (ii) an election result that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters, or (iii) disclosure of confidential information, such as the votes cast by a voter. The extent to which these vulnerabilities could actually be exploited in the ODBP is beyond the scope of this report given our lack of system context. Secure handling and audit of the Voter Choice Records may defend against some or all of these vulnerabilities, but these procedures were not available for review.We identify three findings of particular significance:
- The use of supervised polling stations provides significantly better protection against voter coercion or vote- selling than is present in some other absentee voting systems, such as voting by mail.
- Two copies of each vote are stored: one electronically, and another on paper as a Voter Choice Record. This pro- vides redundancy that is not present in existing vote-by-mail systems. If the electronic votes are well-protected, then they can enable audit of the paper records in ways that are not currently possible.
- After casting their ballot, each voter is given a receipt that is intended to give voters confidence that their votes were “Counted as Cast”. These receipts do not achieve their stated goal of allowing voters to “independently verify that their ballots have been correctly accounted for.” These receipts might indicate that a vote was received and decrypted by the county (a property not typically provided by current postal voting systems), but they do not provide assurance that the voter’s vote was correctly recorded.
Also interesting to note, one of the organizations on “Scytl Partners” tab is Oracle, a major supporter to all-things-Democrat. And another Scytl Partner is a spooky “global governance” organization called Gov2u.org. Check them out. Yikes.Yesterday, I posted an article about Hewlett Packard. They also seem to be about “global governance”.Terry C., an American Freedom reader, provided the following information:I’ve been doing some research on the Director of US operations, recently hired by SCYTL in 2011. His name is Paul Stenbjorn who was previously the Executive Director of the DC Board of Elections and Ethics. He conducted an interview online with Etopia news December 29th 2011 in which he admitted that once a voter had cast their vote online that their vote COULD BE CHANGED, MANY TIMES. View the attachment and see for yourself. Wake up America!!!Paul Stenbjorn’s comment about changing your votes begins around the 8 minute mark of the interview.Paul Stenbjorn at Scytl discusses election modernization | Etopia News Now on BlipClick here to read other posts regarding ScytlIt is ESSENTIAL that we share this information with our friends and representatives. It is OUR right to have our votes counted!PLEASE DO YOUR PART FOR THE SAKE OF FREEDOM AND PASS THIS ALONG!
Good bye ACORN, Hello #Scytl | American Freedom
[Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., wrote the following about voter fraud in California.]
42. Plaintiff Taitz, as a candidate for the U.S. Senate, obtained from the Secretary of State of California an official DVD of the total number of registered voters in California. She forwarded this DVD to a number of analysts for analysis and verification of [the] validity of voter registrations. [The] Secretary of State did not provide all the information. For example, important parameters, such as Driver's License numbers and the last four digits of the Social Security numbers, were not provided; however, even with limited data, hundreds of thousands of flagrantly invalid voter registrations were found by computer engineers and relational data analysts, who analyzed the data of over 17 million voters.
David Yun, a DeVry computer science graduate with over 10 years of experience as an analyst, examined the data and found that based on one parameter alone, 2150(6) California Elections Code “State or country of Birth,” there were 756,213 illegal [voters] and illegal voter registrations which did not contain required information. (Exhibit 18 Affidavit of David Yun). According to California Elections code 2150, “Country of Origin” is a required field that has to be filled out in order for the submitted voter registration to be accepted by the Registrar as valid.
Additionally, employees of the Registrar of Los Angeles County admitted to falsification of voter registrations, where they themselves marked that [the] applicant was born in the U.S. when such information was missing. Considering that Los Angeles county is the most populated county in the nation, with 9,889,056 people, [the] number of individuals with such falsified information can be in [the] hundreds of thousands. Without updating the database and immediately sending to voters proper voter registration forms with “2150(6) State or Country of Birth” area to be properly filled out, it is impossible to know how many hundreds of thousands of voter registrations there are with “State or Country of Birth” being falsified by the registrars and filled out by the registrars themselves. (Exhibit 29 e-mail received from Public records of the Los Angeles Registrar publicrecords@rrcc.lacounty.gov) According to the Public Records Department of the Los Angeles Registrar, [the] data entry operator is instructed to enter “U.S.” when the country of origin is missing. Moreover, posting “U.S.” is not sufficient, as Elections Code 2150 clearly states that the registration should contain “2150 (6) State or country of birth”. This means that if a person is born in the United States, it is not sufficient to enter "U.S."; [the] elector has to enter the name of the state where he was born. Only if he was born outside the U.S. can he enter the country of birth only. All of the voter registrations that do not have either the name of the state within the U.S., or [the] foreign country where the individual was born, have to be removed from the voter roll as invalid.
Similarly, employees of the Orange County Registrar and other Registrars admitted that when voter registrations were missing the birth date, [the] year 1900 was marked as a birth year, which is a clear falsification of the voter registration. (Exhibit 28, 29) Not only there has to be an injunction and the court order to update the databases, and send to all the registered voters requests to update their information, but there has to be a criminal investigation and prosecution of Registrars and other election officials who engaged in falsification of records.
Currently [the] Obama administration issued an Executive Order ([the] DREAM Act) which would allow illegal immigrants under [age] 31 to stay in the U.S. and obtain work permits. [The] California legislature responded by ruling that such illegal immigrants will be allowed to obtain California driver's licenses. When one obtains a driver's license, he is given a voter registration as well under the Motor-Voter act. Upon receiving a voter registration, a person can register to vote on line without anyone checking a thing, without anyone checking a driver's license, last four digits of a Social Security number, or citizenship status.
According to the Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics, in 2009 there were 2.6 million illegal aliens in California, (25% of all illegal aliens in the U.S.). [The] majority of them reside in Los Angeles County. (Exhibit 30) According to the Department of Homeland Security, in 2008, there were 31 million non-citizens residing in the U.S. (19.6 legal residents and 11.5 illegal immigrants). There is no official estimate for 2012, but it is clearly higher than [the] 31 million that we had in 2008.
While the official DHS numbers put the number of illegal aliens [at] only 12 million, most surveys put this number [at] around 30-36 million. According to retired Senior Deportation Officer of Homeland Security John Sampson, [the] immigration community estimates the total number of people who came to the U.S. illegally and [the] ones who overstayed their visas to be 42 million.
California population is estimated at 39 million, which is 12.5% of the total 311 million of the US population.
Considering the fact that California is a Southern border state with one of the most liberal establishments in the nation, with sanctuary cities, [the] percentage of illegal and legal immigrants in CA is expected to greatly exceed the proportionate share of 12,5% that California comprises in the total U.S. population.
[The] Department of Homeland Security's own survey of 2008 estimates that 25% or a quarter of all illegal aliens reside in California.
So, if one were to use the most conservative estimates of [the] DHS from 2008, there are 7.75 million non-citizens, people who are not allowed to vote, resid[ing] in California.
When you take into consideration the real numbers and not whitewashed, rafinated official numbers, we have as many as 10.5 million illegal aliens in California (25% of 42 million) and approximately 5 million legal aliens (25% of around 20 million legal aliens). This means that between 7.75 million to 15.5 million individuals who are not allowed to vote reside in the state of California. These people can easily register on line, write anything, and Registrars will simply accept those registrations, and nothing is being checked.
In over 25 years that Plaintiff Taitz resided in the state of California, she does not recall the Secretary of State ever sending any forms to update the voter rolls.
These numbers are staggering, not only because of California['s] 55 electoral votes, but also because the pipeline of driver's licenses given in California to millions of illegal aliens can be used to register on line to vote in smaller election battleground states.
--
Dr Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
52 days to stop illegals from stealing your vote!
Go here:
http://www.alipac.us/f8/52-days-stop...5/#post1303723
For more info on Election Fraud and how to fight it go to:
True The Vote
BECOME A POLL WATCHER OR AN ELECTION JUDGE:
http://vote.nyc.ny.us/pdf/documents/boe ... ersguide.p
http://www.elections.il.gov/downloads/e ... judges.pdf
Each state has a place where you can train and be a poll watcher. Check out your own state for more details and get trained early
Open Letter to my congressman about Spanish Company that will be counting 2012 election votes for the US
- Posted by Hiscomm on April 10, 2012 at 7:58pm
Dear Congressman: Thank you for the work you are doing to get our economy revived. And hopefully you will have a new executive in Nov to help you. Which brings me to the article I pasted below which is terrifying for freedom lovers. The results of our "American elections" are going to be tabulated by a private company in Spain! Who's CEO is a enthusiastic supporter of Obama and who's company is probably silently owned in part or all by George Soros or his socialist associations whom hates America.
And as the article points out, Obama was real confident when he was telling the Russians that he would have more flexibility after the election. Congressman, this is grave! This President has thumbed his nose at the Constitution, usurped power, threatened individuals and companies with strong arm tactics using the weight of various governmental departments and union thugs to bypass the congress and attack his enemies. You have a president who goes against the interests of America at every step. 1.5 billion to the Muslim brother hood, giving Russia resource rich areas around Alaska, writing executive orders, to give complete control of all assets and capability private and governmental of the country over to him and bypassing congress completely in case of Attack or major catastrophe.
He has already committed troops how many times without congressional approval? By Executive order he has given INTERPOL complete immunity from oversight from our law enforcement agencies of any of their activities including their offices. Can you tell me why a President would give INTERPOL the run of the country without any over sight. Can you tell me why the known terrorist organization of the Muslim Brotherhood which OBAMA has helped get intrenched by helping overthrow the leadership of countries that was keeping them in check, who has openly exclaimed there goal is to destroy Israel and America. Yet the administration allocates 1.5 billion to the Egyptian government and not to the Egyptian military.
A President who has done everything to thwart our energy dependence. Stonewalling the Keystone pipeline which would give us oil and create 50+ thousands of jobs for our economy and then give Soros's Brazilian oil company loans or grants for them to develop their drilling capabilities and say we will be their best customer!? A Justice Department who turns a blind eye to voter fraud and intimidation and sacrifices it's employees on the Alter of 2ND amendment politics to sway the opinion of the American people on guns. An administration that is actively seeking to promote racial social unrest and division to bring about riots to give an opportunity to “not waste a crisis”! I'm sorry, Congressman I read people not by their words but by what they do. I know all about the Presidents questionable past and associations that were swept underneath the rug during the last election cycle. I also know that five years from now a person will become who their hanging out with, what their reading and what their watching and listening too.
And this President's past radical associations is bearing the above fruit and the truth of his motives is coming to the light...hatred for America, hatred for the Constitution. And make no mistake, this is an orchestrated plan for our destruction. He's almost done it, but 4 more years we will be castrated and left dying in our blood. I hope you have the discernment to see what's going on and start sounding the alarm. So when we think of voter fraud, it's the democrat party who has built systems and organizations who have been laboring to bring it down to a science. And now with the most important election of our history, determining if we will be living under as socialist/communist (“Mr Putin, I'll have more flexibility after the election”) dictator ship,. “Behold” a socialist leaning company, with possible Soros ties, from a socialist country is going to get to tabulate the results of the 2012 election!!!??? Please Congressman , for the sake of whats left of our country will you investigate this!! If this is not addressed, it is definitley in no uncertain terms deraliction of duty!
I might add, they would probally love to arrange a democratic victory in the ohio 16th district despite a record turnout of motivated Republican Voters and a low turn out of flat, hungover, high democrats. But somehow, after the tabulations, the democrat party pulled out another victory which seemed to pop up all over America according to the tabulations of SKYTL. This has to be stopped!
These quotes from Lenin do not sound so crazy anymore after three years especially since there are 60,70,80 card carrying socialsits in congress: Lenin: We have to use any ruse, dodge, trick, cunning, unlawful method, concealment, and veiling of the truth. The basic rule is to exploit the conflicting interests of the capitalist states.“ Lenin in 1922: First we shall take Eastern Europe, then the masses of Asia. After that, we shall surround and undermine the U.S.A., which will fall into our hands without a struggle…. Like an overripe fruit.
” ttp://www.westernjournalism.com/spanish-company-will-count-american-votes-overseas-in-november/?utm_source=Western+Journalism&utm_campaign=acb522 fb30-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email
When the Spanish online voting company SKYTL bought the largest vote processing corporation in the United States, it also acquired the means of manufacturing the outcome of the 2012 election. For SOE, the Tampa based corporation purchased by SKYTL in January, supplies the election software which records, counts, and reports the votes of Americans in 26 states–900 total jurisdictions–across the nation. As the largest election results reporting company in the US, SOE provides reports right down to the precinct level. But before going anywhere else, those election returns are routed to individual, company servers where the people who run them “…get ‘first look’ at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.”
In short, “this redirects results …to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.” And although the votes will be cast in hometown, American precincts on Election Day, with the Barcelona-based SKYTL taking charge of the process, they will be routed and counted overseas. SKYTL itself is a leader in internet voting technology and in 2010 was involved in modernizing election systems for the midterm election in 14 American states. But although SKYTL’s self-proclaimed reputation for security had won the company the Congressionally approved task of handling internet voting for American citizens and members of the military overseas, upon opening the system for use in the District of Columbia, the University of Michigan fight song “The Victors” was suddenly heard after the casting of each ballot.
The system had been hacked by U of M computer teachers and students in response to a challenge by SKYTL that anyone who wished to do so, might try! Nevertheless, in spite of warnings by experts across the nation, American soldiers overseas will once again vote via the internet in 2012. And because SKYTL will control the method of voting and—thanks to the purchase of SOE–the method of counting the votes as well, there “…will be no ballots, no physical evidence, no way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes…or the count.” The American advocacy group Project Vote has concluded that SKYTL’s internet voting system is vulnerable to attack from the outside AND the inside, a situation which could result in “…an election that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters…” Talk about having a flair for understatement! It has also been claimed that SKYTL CEO Pere Valles is a socialist who donated heavily to the 2008 Obama campaign and lived in Chicago during Obama’s time as Illinois State Senator. Unfortunately, given what is known about the character of Barack Obama, such rumors must be taken as serious threats to the integrity of the 2012 vote and the legitimate outcome of the election. Though much has been written about the threat of nationwide voting by illegals in November, it is still true that most election fraud is an “inside” job.
And there now exists a purely electronic voting service which uses no physical ballots to which an electronic count can be matched should questions arise. Add to this the fact that the same company will have “first count” on all votes made in 14 US states and hundreds of jurisdictions in 12 others, and the stage is set for election fraud on a scale unimaginable just a decade ago. Perhaps Obama had reason for supreme confidence when he said “after my election” rather than “in case of” to Russian President Medvedev a week ago.
Blogs - Tea Party Nation...
Voter fraud complaint filed against Florida Democrats
By Associated Press
Friday, October 5, 2012 -
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Florida officials are reviewing allegations of voter registration fraud against the state Democratic Party.
The Florida Department of State on Friday confirmed that it has forwarded complaints about voter registration fraud that have been filed against the Democrats, as well as against two groups — the Florida New Majority Education Fund and National Council of La Raza/Democracia USA.
Neither the agency nor the Florida Department of Law Enforcement would comment on the extent of the allegations or on how many voter registration forms it involves.
Lee County Supervisor of Elections Sharon Harrington confirmed that a complaint regarding voter registration forms had come from her county, but declined further comment.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/south/view.bg?articleid=1...
Secretary of State Scott Gessler: Left doesn't care about voter fraud
Posted: 10/05/2012 12:01:00 AM MDTBy Tim Hoover
Updated: 10/05/2012 12:20:56 PM MDT
The Denver Post
http://extras.mnginteractive.com/liv...essler_200.jpgSecretary of State Scott Gessler.
Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler told a conservative audience Thursday that his critics really don't care about voter fraud and are "willing to lie" and "play the racism card."
Gessler, a Republican, made his comments during a panel discussion Thursday titled, "Stealing Elections: What the Left Doesn't Want You to Know About Voter Fraud," held at a gathering of the Conservative Political Action Conference in Denver. CPAC events regularly draw big names on the right, and Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney even made a surprise visit Friday to the conference, held at a hotel near I-70 and Chambers Road.
The secretary of state appeared on the voter fraud panel along with representatives of several conservative organizations, including True the Vote, a highly controversial group that styles itself as an elections integrity organization but which critics say uses voter intimidation tactics.
Gessler has come under fire for suggesting over a year ago that there were more than 11,000 noncitizens registered in Colorado
Gessler, though, said he believes there are many more noncitizens and his search continues. He said those on the left just don't care if people are legally eligible to vote or not.
"They (the left) don't care if they (would-be voters) are non-citizens," he told hundreds in the audience. "They'll register them to vote, and if that noncitizen registers and then votes, they suffer serious consequences -- criminal prosecution, loss of the ability to ever become a citizen -- but the voter registration drive never suffers any of those consequences.
"So, I think they're very happy to manipulate people into believing it's OK to ignore these laws."
He added that the left tries to generate hatred, "to sort of manipulate people to get them angry against a make-believe enemy that doesn't exist in an effort to win votes, to demonize, frankly, people who are conservative and believe in limited government."
Gessler continued, "This is the tool they use, and of course the ultimate card they play is the racism card. And they are more than willing to lie to do this."
Read more: Secretary of State Scott Gessler: Left doesn't care about voter fra... http://www.denverpost.com/politics/ci_21702894/secretary-state-scot...
We tried our best. :(
Saturday, 12 October 2013 14:50
Soros-connected Vote-counting Firm Expands in U.S.
Written by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/media/...cb9c88ff_M.jpg
A Spanish vote-tabulation firm with ties to billionaire globalist George Soros is purchasing software to give it greater power over the voting in U.S. elections.
In a press release under a Barcelona and Tampa, Florida dateline, Scytl announced:
Scytl's end-to-end election modernization solution covers the full election cycle (Pre-election, Election Day and Post-election), providing electoral bodies the most secure, transparent, auditable and accessible solution in the marketplace and allows Scytl to offer personalized election modernization roadmaps to their customers combining both traditional and online voting solutions as needed.
In order to consolidate such beginning-to-end control, Scytl has purchased software from a trio of organizations within the gravitational pull of planet Soros.
Again, from the press release:
Scytl, the worldwide leader in secure online voting and election modernization, continues receiving electoral and industry expert recognition for its end-to-end election modernization technology and electoral roadmap implementation approach from organizations such as IDC, Ovum and ACEEEO.
Regarding the benefit of its cooperation with Ovum, Scytl writes:
"We believe Scytl's wide variety of offerings, investment into certifications, and emphasis on security, auditing, and testing position the company as a dominant provider in election modernization," says Nishant Shah, Research Analyst at Ovum and author of the On the Radar: Scytl report.
Shah’s biographical sketch on the Ovum website is worth reading in light of his influence on the machines that count votes in American elections.
Before joining Ovum, Nishant’s work spanned organizational strategy, project management, sustainability, and business development. This included facilitating large-scale public-private partnerships in international health for Ambassador Richard Holbrooke and his Global Business Coalition....
That snippet contains several red flags. First, there is Shah’s facilitation of “large-scale public-private partnerships” or PPPs.
A PPP is often defined as “a contract between a public sector authority and a private party, in which the private party provides a public service or project and assumes substantial financial, technical and operational risk in the project.” As part of this scheme, a private company is given control over some public function typically provided by government. It is a tactic very much in vogue in internationalist circles and is considered an effective way to sneak the influence and the control of the UN in the back door.
Regardless of the rhetoric, the true purpose of PPPs is to consolidate government and private corporations, giving them joint control over public entities. The result is the elimination of local sovereignty and the insidious replacement of county election commissions with a board of directors of a company whose mission statement calls for the creation of an executive governing body that is neither fish nor fowl, but is obliged to enforce international treaties and regulations written by the apparatchiks at the UN.
Given the UN’s role in promoting PPPs, it is likely that those administering these centralized partnerships will come from a coterie of managers accustomed to looking to the international body or federal agencies for guidance, if recent initiatives such as Agenda 21 are any example.
As envisioned by the UN and the internationalists in the U.S. government, PPPs will slyly seize control of elections, transferring authority for this vital expression of republican government from local and state boards to pseudo-private agencies made up of a mish-mash of federal agents and bureaucratic overseers adhering to global government regulations.
The second warning bell that sounds in the Shah biography is his affiliation with the GlobalBusiness Coalition.
George Soros is the “founding supporter” of Global Business Coalition.
There is yet another Shah-Soros connection.
Later in Shah’s Ovum bio, his work with the Acumen Fund in Pakistan is noted. Soros’s daughter, Andrea, serves on the board of this organization. She also sits on the board of her father’s Open Society Foundation.
Following the dotted lines connecting the Open Society Foundation to Scytl and on to Soros, is a bit of a challenge, but one worth accepting. In an article published on World Net Daily, Aaron Klein ably guides readers from strand to strand in this web of influence.
Scytl purchased the software division of Gov2U, described as a non-profit organization dedicated to developing and promoting the use of technology in the fields of governance and democracy.
A Scytl press release said: “Gov2U created its software division in 2004 and, since then, it has developed a wide array of innovative award-winning eDemocracy solutions that have been implemented in multiple countries across Europe, Africa and America at the local, regional and federal government levels.”
The Spain-based company says the “main purpose of these tools is to engage citizens in participatory processes through the use of online and offline platforms, bringing more transparency and legitimacy to decision-making processes.”
Gov4U is currently partnered with Soros’ Open Society to support and develop a group called the Declaration on Parliamentary Openness.
The group runs a website, OpeningParliament.org, which says it is a forum “intended to help connect the world’s civic organizations engaged in monitoring, supporting and opening up their countries’ parliaments and legislative institutions.”
Gov4U, meanwhile, has eight partners of its own listed on its website, including the Soros-funded and partnered National Democratic Institute, or NDI.
Aside from receiving financial support for Soros, NDI has co-hosted scores of events along with Soros’ Open Society. The two groups work closely together.
NDI and the Open Society, for example, worked together to push for electoral and legislative reform in Romania.
NDI boasts that with Open Society Institute funds it conducted a political leadership training series for Romanian activists to “bring tangible improvements to their communities.”
NDI describes itself as a nonprofit, nonpartisan, nongovernmental organization working to establish and strengthen political and civic organizations, safeguard elections and promote citizen participation, openness and accountability in government.
NDI previously stated it was founded to draw on the traditions of the U.S. Democratic Party.
WND found that NDI is also listed as the only U.S.-associated organization of Socialists International, the world’s largest socialist umbrella group.
NDI was originally created by the federally funded National Endowment for Democracy, or NED, which itself founded joint NDI projects with the Open Society. Another NDI financial backer is the United States Agency for International Development, USAID.
It is disturbing to discover that not only is Scytl found in the Soros sphere, but it has demonstrable connections to international socialism, the U.S. Democratic Party, and the United Nations, as well.
Taken alone, these unsettling associations might make voters question their electoral board’s contracting with Scytl to administer elections in the United States. When viewed in context of the spread of Scytl’s support of vote counting, however, the picture takes on a darker aspect.
For example, the state of Florida was using Scytl to tabulate election results, but later rescinded the contract after uncovering evidence of significant risks in the methods the Barcelona-based company was employing.
According to the report issued by the Florida Department of State:
Our findings identified vulnerabilities that, in the worst case, could result in (i) voters being unable to cast votes, (ii) an election result that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters, or (iii) disclosure of confidential information, such as the votes cast by a voter.
Then in 2010, the Scytl system in use in Washington, D.C. was hacked. As part of an effort to determine the reliability of the devices, the D.C. Board of Elections & Ethics reportedly “encouraged outside parties to hack and find flaws in its new online balloting system.” Answering the challenge, students from the University of Michigan successfully violated the site and programmed it to play the University of Michigan fight song every time a vote was cast.
Why should this alarm Americans who don’t live in those jurisdictions? Chiefly because during the midterm elections in November 2010, Scytl was contracted by 14 states to “modernize” their voting apparatuses.
Scytl is set to deploy its software in 900 U.S. jurisdictions. The firm already handles the balloting for members of the U.S. military and their families living overseas.
During that election cycle (midterm 2010) the following states used Scytl’s technology in tabulating votes: New York, Texas, Washington, California, Florida, Alabama, Missouri, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, New Mexico, Nebraska, West Virginia, and Washington, D.C.
Furthermore, Voter Action, an election integrity advocacy group, filed a complaint with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission in April 2010 alleging that the use of Scytl’s systems in the voting process “raises national security concerns.”
“Foreign governments may also seek to undermine the national security interests of the United States, either directly or through other organizations,” the complaint claimed.
In support of this last assertion, the complaint reveals that Scytl was formed in 2001 as the result of work done by a research group at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, work which was financed in large part by the Spanish government’s Ministry of Science and Technology.
Such associations are certainly worth examining very closely before control of our elections is handed over to Scytl. Especially in light of Scytl’s practice of downloading the votes from each precinct where its devices are in use to a company-owned server where they will be stored. Once the votes are collected, counted, and collated by Scytl and saved on its own proprietary servers, it would be nearly impossible to track any discrepancies between the numbers it reports and the actually vote tallies as taken at the local polling places.
Finally, although it certainly doesn’t crow about its strong ties to George Soros and international socialism, Scytl boldly declares that its services “power 90% of binding elections....”
The list of its current “partners” is enough to give pause to citizens in these states and justify a demand that local election boards disclose how much control over the voting process they’ve surrendered to Scytl.
The following states are listed as current customers on the Scytl website:
Alaska
Arkansas
Kentucky
North Carolina
Arizona
Mississippi
Virginia
West Virginia
Florida
Alabama
New York
and the city of Washington, D.C.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...expands-in-u-s
Bttt for those who have not seen thread.
Thanks NM....we need to be focused in on voter fraud because you can bet that the Dems are going to be going full throttle with the voter fraud this year.
I though you might like that April.
:)
January 12, 2014 6:30 PM
John Fund
National Review
http://c1.nrostatic.com/sites/defaul...f-Its-Easy.jpg
Undercover agents were able to vote as dead people, but election officials are attacking the agents.
Liberals who oppose efforts to prevent voter fraud claim that there is no fraud — or at least not any that involves voting in person at the polls.
But New York City’s watchdog Department of Investigations has just provided the latest evidence of how easy it is to commit voter fraud that is almost undetectable. DOI undercover agents showed up at 63 polling places last fall and pretended to be voters who should have been turned away by election officials; the agents assumed the names of individuals who had died or moved out of town, or who were sitting in jail. In 61 instances, or 97 percent of the time, the testers were allowed to vote. Those who did vote cast only a write-in vote for a “John Test” so as to not affect the outcome of any contest. DOI published its findings two weeks ago in a searing 70-page report accusing the city’s Board of Elections of incompetence, waste, nepotism, and lax procedures.
The Board of Elections, which has a $750 million annual budget and a work force of 350 people, reacted in classic bureaucratic fashion, which prompted one city paper to deride it as “a 21st-century survivor of Boss Tweed–style politics.” The Board approved a resolution referring the DOI’s investigators for prosecution. It also asked the state’s attorney general to determine whether DOI had violated the civil rights of voters who had moved or are felons, and it sent a letter of complaint to Mayor Bill de Blasio. Normally, I wouldn’t think de Blasio would give the BOE the time of day, but New York’s new mayor has long been a close ally of former leaders of ACORN, the now-disgraced “community organizing” group that saw its employees convicted of voter-registration fraud all over the country during and after the 2008 election.
Greg Soumas, president of New York’s BOE, offered a justification for calling in the prosecutors: “If something was done in an untoward fashion, it was only done by DOI. We [are] unaware of any color of authority on the part of [DOI] to vote in the identity of any person other than themselves — and our reading of the election law is that such an act constitutes a felony.” The Board is bipartisan, and all but two of its members voted with Soumas. The sole exceptions were Democrat Jose Araujo, who abstained because the DOI report implicated him in hiring his wife and sister-and-law for Board jobs, and Republican Simon Shamoun.
Good-government groups are gobsmacked at Soumas’s refusal to smell the stench of corruption in his patronage-riddled empire. “They should focus not on assigning blame to others, but on taking responsibility for solving the problems themselves,” Dick Dadey of the watchdog group Citizens Union told the Daily News. “It’s a case of the Board of Elections passing the buck.” DOI officials respond that the use of undercover agents is routine in anti-corruption probes and that people should carefully read the 70-page report they’ve filed before criticizing it. They are surprised how little media attention their report has received.
You’d think more media outlets would have been interested, because the sloppiness revealed in the DOI report is mind-boggling. Young undercover agents were able to vote using the names of people three times their age, people who in fact were dead. In one example, a 24-year female agent gave the name of someone who had died in 2012 at age 87; the workers at the Manhattan polling site gave her a ballot, no questions asked. Even the two cases where poll workers turned away an investigator raise eyebrows. In the first case, a poll worker on Staten Island walked outside with the undercover investigator who had just been refused a ballot; the “voter” was advised to go to the polling place near where he used to live and “play dumb” in order to vote. In the second case, the investigator was stopped from voting only because the felon whose name he was using was the son of the election official at the polling place.
Shooting the messenger has been a typical reaction in other states when people have demonstrated just how easy it is to commit voter fraud. Guerrilla videographer James O’Keefe had three of his assistants visit precincts during New Hampshire’s January 2012 presidential primary. They asked poll workers whether their books listed the names of several voters, all deceased individuals still listed on voter-registration rolls. Poll workers handed out ten ballots, never once asking for a photo ID. O’Keefe’s team immediately gave back the ballots, unmarked, to precinct workers. Debbie Lane, a ballot inspector at one of the Manchester polling sites, later said: “I wasn’t sure what I was allowed to do. . . . I can’t tell someone not to vote, I suppose.” The only precinct in which O’Keefe or his crew did not obtain a ballot was one in which the local precinct officer had personally known the dead “voter.”
New Hampshire’s Democratic governor, John Lynch, sputtered when asked about O’Keefe’s video, and he condemned the effort to test the election system even though no actual votes were cast. “They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, if in fact they’re found guilty of some criminal act,” he roared. But cooler heads eventually prevailed, and the GOP state legislature later approved a voter-ID bill, with enough votes to override the governor’s veto. Despite an exhaustive and intrusive investigation, no charges were ever filed against any of O’Keefe’s associates.
Later in 2012, in Washington, D.C., one of O’Keefe’s assistants was able to obtain Attorney General Eric Holder’s ballot even though Holder is 62 years old and bears no resemblance to the 22-year-old white man who obtained it merely by asking if Eric Holder was on the rolls. But the Department of Justice, which is currently suing Texas to block that state’s photo-ID law, dismissed the Holder ballot incident as “manufactured.” The irony was lost on the DOJ that Holder, a staunch opponent of voter-ID laws, could have himself been disenfranchised by a white man because Washington, D.C., has no voter-ID law. Polls consistently show that more than 70 percent of Americans — including clear majorities of African Americans and Hispanics — support such laws.
Liberals who oppose ballot-security measures claim that there are few prosecutions for voter fraud, which they take to mean that fraud doesn’t happen. But as the New York DOI report demonstrates, it is comically easy, given the sloppy-voter registration records often kept in America, to commit voter fraud in person. (A 2012 study by the Pew Research Center found that nationwide, at least 1.8 million deceased voters are still registered to vote.) And unless someone confesses, in-person voter fraud is very difficult to detect — or stop. New York’s Gothamist news service reported last September that four poll workers in Brooklyn reported they believed people were trying to vote in the name of other registered voters. Police officers observed the problems but did nothing because voter fraud isn’t under the police department’s purview.
What the DOI investigators were able to do was eerily similar to actual fraud that has occurred in New York before. In 1984, Brooklyn’s Democratic district attorney, Elizabeth Holtzman, released a state grand-jury report on a successful 14-year conspiracy that cast thousands of fraudulent votes in local, state, and congressional elections. Just like the DOI undercover operatives, the conspirators cast votes at precincts in the names of dead, moved, and bogus voters. The grand jury recommended voter ID, a basic election-integrity measure that New York has steadfastly refused to implement.
In states where non-photo ID is required, it’s also all too easy to manufacture records that allow people to vote. In 2012, the son of Congressman Jim Moran, the Democrat who represents Virginia’s Washington suburbs, had to resign as field director for his father’s campaign after it became clear that he had encouraged voter fraud. Patrick Moran was caught advising an O’Keefe videographer on how to commit in-person voter fraud. The scheme involved using a personal computer to forge utility bills that would satisfy Virginia’s voter-ID law and then relying on the assistance of Democratic lawyers stationed at the polls to make sure the fraudulent votes were counted. Last year, Virginia tightened its voter-ID law and ruled that showing a utility bill was no longer sufficient to obtain a ballot.
Given that someone who is dead, is in jail, or has moved isn’t likely to complain if someone votes in his name, how do we know that voter fraud at the polls isn’t a problem? An ounce of prevention — in the form of voter ID and better training of poll workers — should be among the minimum precautions taken to prevent an electoral miscarriage or meltdown in a close race.
After all, even a small number of votes can have sweeping consequences. Al Franken’s 312-vote victory in 2008 over Minnesota senator Norm Coleman gave Democrats a filibuster-proof Senate majority of 60 votes, which allowed them to pass Obamacare. Months after the Obamacare vote, a conservative group called Minnesota Majority finished comparing criminal records with voting rolls and identified 1,099 felons — all ineligible to vote — who had voted in the Franken–Coleman race. Fox News random interviews with ten of those felons found that nine had voted for Franken, backing up national academic studies that show felons tend to vote strongly for Democrats.
Minnesota Majority took its findings to prosecutors across the state, but very few showed any interest in pursuing the issue. Some did, though, and 177 people have been convicted as of mid 2012 — not just “accused” but actually convicted — of voting fraudulently in the Senate race. Probably the only reason the number of convictions isn’t higher is that the standard for convicting someone of voter fraud in Minnesota is that the person must have been both ineligible and must have “knowingly” voted unlawfully. Anyone accused of fraud is apt to get off by claiming he didn’t know he’d done anything wrong.
Given that we now know for certain how easy it is to commit undetectable voter fraud and how serious the consequences can be, it’s truly bizarre to have officials at the New York City Board of Elections and elsewhere savage those who shine a light on the fact that their modus operandi invites fraud. One might even think that they’re covering up their incompetence or that they don’t want to pay attention to what crimes could be occurring behind the curtains at their polling places. Or both.
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/368234/print
Our first funds drive of the year is underway and we need our members to support us as we again take up the fight to stop massive invasion of our country. You can make a difference please consider a donation today. Thank you
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...lDZDWEH-48jAAQ
Please take a few minutes to visit our secure online donations page to make a donation for $100, $50, or $25 or more at...
http://www.alipac.us/donations/