Originally Posted by
ALIPAC
I do not claim to have all the answers to this question.
But my best guess based on my experiences is that liberals discriminate when hiring without resistance to their prejudice in many fields such as the media, Hollywood, schools, etc... and they work to assure that their news rooms are mostly ideologically pure.
Most of the news rooms I am very familiar with are either completely stocked with liberals or they have a token conservative or libertarian here or there.
And even if they do have a conservative or a fair minded reporter on their staff stories have to be cleared and edited by their higher ups before ever seeing the light of day.
Liberals are taught since birth that white people are inherently evil and responsible for the worlds ills. Associations with white Americans focus on slavery, the destruction of Indian tribes, perceived prior abuses and subjugation of women, stealing land from Mexicans etc... In fact, I was taught as a young indoctrinated liberal that if one did not practice diligence at all times that white people would group up and start lynching blacks and sticking Jewish people into ovens.
I know now that is not the case and that I had been brainwashed so bad that I was accusatory against those that had vanquished the fascist as being just like them due to similarities of race.
My only escape as a white male was to be subservient and penitent to this false religion of multiculturalism at all times and in all thoughts and deeds to make amends for the perceived abuses of other demographics for my white male imperialist rapist ancestors etc...
Liberals only make up about 20% of American society so for them to grow or make ground politically they have to divide people against what they see as white conservatives that would conserve good things they liked about America that liberals, communists, and socialists and their divided animus sub groups collectively want to change, transfigure, control, or destroy.
So if the story fits their ideology of a white oppressor abusing minority groups, it runs.
If it involves whites being raped, assaulted or slaughtered by minorities the story gets completely censored, modified, or only limited coverage.
Liberals not only write to try to persuade others to their world view but they are also elitists. I used to be one as well before I came to believe in the wisdom of the masses and vox populi vox dei.
Since liberals believe that most whites are inherent racists ready to harm someone at any moment if you don't constantly bombard them with messages about how bad the KKK and Adolf Hitler are, they don't want to run stories about minority attacks on whites because that might stir up those perceived violent tendencies amongst the unwashed masses....
Ignorant masses that need liberal elite leaders to tell them how to think and what to think and how to speak.
So my best guess is that the bias we are seeing is part of the liberals world view and elitist attitude that printing balanced coverage would lead to white oppression against minorities and erode what they perceive as advances in civil rights for minority groups.
The minority is always seen as the victim, even when the perpetrator and white male oppression is a bigger concern to them than a few thousand of Americans killed by minorities each year.
Liberals are brainwashed and indoctrinated people, so to maintain the spell on them their writings and world view have to be very divergent from reality. And thus the art work and writings they create are inverted to reality. Many of them lose their liberal views, like the 78 year old man that was beaten, when reality restores them to a more realist position.
Like with illegal immigration, everyone is free to formulate their own opinions on why it happening.
What we need to unify on is what is happening (regardless of why) and what we need to do to address it.
W
