Ann Coulter thinks Jared Kushner wrote the anonymous op-ed bashing Trump (I agree)

I agree with Ann Coulter's assessment.

Ann Coulter thinks Jared Kushner wrote the anonymous op-ed bashing Trump


Sam Berman
Sep 13th 2018 1:25PM


Ann Coulter thinks President Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, is the one who wrote the NY Times op-ed attacking Trump.

The author of the op-ed described a group in the White House that are actively working against the president’s agenda and impulses.

Coulter told the Daily Beast she thinks Kushner wrote it for a number of reasons including, “Because he and Ivanka are going to have to go back to the Upper East Side and go to the Hamptons.”

She thinks that the couple is worried Trump might be removed within the next few years and are trying to redeem themselves.

https://o.aolcdn.com/images/dims?thu...4c548b7f373f65 19 TWEETS
Ivanka Trump's 2017 controversies
See Gallery






It’s important to note Coulter didn’t provide any hard evidence just her opinion.

https://o.aolcdn.com/ads/adchoices.png


In her latest book, “Resistance Is Futile! How the Trump-Hating Left Lost Its Collective Mind,” she paints a fantasy scenario where Trump shoots Kushner for ruining his Presidency and blames it on Steve Bannon.

The reason she says Trump hasn’t shot Kushner yet? Well, because he doesn’t know that his son-in-law is allegedly ruining his presidency.


https://www.aol.com/article/news/201...rump/23526317/

wow

Quote:

---

It’s important to note Coulter didn’t provide any hard evidence just her opinion.

---

Totally absurd! This time I think she lost her head. Kushner would have to be a total lefty. His notoriety is being connected to the Presidency. He would be ending his own future if he did that.

I tend to think it is a fabrication by the NYT. Much like the Woodward book seems to be mostly fabrications of conversations the subjects say never took place, to push an agenda. This if true puts Ann Coulter in the league with all the Trump Haters who actually fabricated the story.

I'm glad Coulter is hitting Kushner whether he wrote the letter or not because his inlfuence and Ivanka's influence on Trump has been counter most of the MAGA promises Trump made.

And even if Kushner did not write the Op-Ed, it is a safe bet he probably thinks this way.

Three cheers for Coulter being willing to say what needs to be said.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

I'm glad Coulter is hitting Kushner whether he wrote the letter or not because his inlfuence and Ivanka's influence on Trump has been counter most of the MAGA promises Trump made.

And even if Kushner did not write the Op-Ed, it is a safe bet he probably thinks this way.

Three cheers for Coulter being willing to say what needs to be said.

---

So the end justifies the means?

Coulter has strong reasons for her suspicions.....

Quote:

---

Jared Kushner had been a lifelong Democrat prior to Donald Trump entering politics.^[43] He had donated over $10,000 to Democratic campaigns^[44] starting at young age of 11. In 2008 he donated to the campaign for Hillary Clinton and his newspaper the New York Observer endorsed Barack Obama over John McCain in the US presidential election.^[45] but after disappointment with Barack Obama he endorsed Republican US presidential race nominee Mitt Romney in 2012 via the New York Observer.^[46] In 2014 he continued to donate to Democratic groups,^[45] but he then continued his "ideological conversion" by joining his father-in-law Donald Trump's nascent US presidential campaign in 2015.^[51] Kushner had no prior involvement in campaign politics or in government before Trump's campaign.^[52]

---

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Kushner

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jtdc

Totally absurd! This time I think she lost her head. Kushner would have to be a total lefty. His notoriety is being connected to the Presidency. He would be ending his own future if he did that.

I tend to think it is a fabrication by the NYT. Much like the Woodward book seems to be mostly fabrications of conversations the subjects say never took place, to push an agenda. This if true puts Ann Coulter in the league with all the Trump Haters who actually fabricated the story.

---

Ann Coulter is entitled to her opinion. If a newspaper wants to print her op-ed, so be it. I don't really think he wrote the letter, but William is right, Kushner is a liberal and has opposed many of our positions on immigration.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MW

I don't really think he wrote the letter, but William is right, Kushner is a liberal and has opposed many of our positions on immigration.

---

So where in past threads you have been critical of "opinions" not based on known fact, now you endorse conviction based on rumor!

In the Wikipedia quote by William "but after disappointment with Barack Obama he endorsed Republican US presidential race nominee Mitt Romney in 2012 via the New York Observer. In 2014 he continued to donate to Democratic groups, but he then continued his "ideological conversion" by joining his father-in-law Donald Trump's nascent US presidential campaign in 2015. Kushner had no prior involvement in campaign politics or in government before Trump's campaign." That says he was not politically active prior to joining the Trump campaign. It also says he was shifting from Democrat ideology to Republican ideology prior to becoming involved in the Trump campaign. That doesn't quite support your claims that he is a liberal. Maybe a RINO. But certainly not militant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jtdc

So where in past threads you have been critical of "opinions" not based on known fact, now you endorse conviction based on rumor!

---

Huh? You need to read what I wrote again.

MW wrote:

Quote:

---

Ann Coulter is entitled to her opinion. If a newspaper wants to print her op-ed, so be it. I don't really think he wrote the letter, but William is right, Kushner is a liberal and has opposed many of our positions on immigration.

---

Where did I endorse anything? I even admitted that I didn't think Kushner wrote the letter.

I would like to see Kushner and Ivanka out of the White House. We did not vote for them OR their views. They have too much influence on Trump and I do not like Ivanka's "give more FREE stuff" programs she is creating!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Beezer

I would like to see Kushner and Ivanka out of the White House. We did not vote for them OR their views. They have too much influence on Trump and I do not like Ivanka's "give more FREE stuff" programs she is creating!!!

---

I too would prefer them gone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jtdc

So where in past threads you have been critical of "opinions" not based on known fact, now you endorse conviction based on rumor!

In the Wikipedia quote by William "but after disappointment with Barack Obama he endorsed Republican US presidential race nominee Mitt Romney in 2012 via the New York Observer. In 2014 he continued to donate to Democratic groups, but he then continued his "ideological conversion" by joining his father-in-law Donald Trump's nascent US presidential campaign in 2015. Kushner had no prior involvement in campaign politics or in government before Trump's campaign." That says he was not politically active prior to joining the Trump campaign. It also says he was shifting from Democrat ideology to Republican ideology prior to becoming involved in the Trump campaign. That doesn't quite support your claims that he is a liberal. Maybe a RINO. But certainly not militant.

---

Kushner was a lifelong Democrat and only converted to Republican when his family had a stake in the Trump presidency. Both Kushner and Ivanka are widely regarded as liberal globalists who support Amnesty for illegal aliens which this organization opposes.

Coulter's position is not just based on rumor. It is her calculated prediction. Ann Coulter has been 100% loyal to the American public on immigration issues. Kushner has not.

So the choice on who to side with here is very easy for anyone truly on our side of the debate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MW

Where did I endorse anything? I even admitted that I didn't think Kushner wrote the letter.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

I'm glad Coulter is hitting Kushner whether he wrote the letter or not because his inlfuence and Ivanka's influence on Trump has been counter most of the MAGA promises Trump made.

And even if Kushner did not write the Op-Ed, it is a safe bet he probably thinks this way.

---

No facts, just speculation about how he thinks. And MW supports that!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jtdc

No facts, just speculation about how he thinks. And MW supports that!

---

What exactly did I speculate, support, or endorse? I offered my opinion when stating I didn't think he wrote the letter. Furthermore, there was no speculation on his history as a liberal, it's well documented. It's also a fact that Kushner and Ivanka worked on convincing Trump not to end the illegal alien program, DACA. So I ask you again, what did I "endorse" or "speculate" on? Please be direct with your response. Thank you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Coulter's position is not just based on rumor. It is her calculated prediction.

---

The title of the thread is "Ann Coulter thinks Jared Kushner wrote the anonymous op-ed bashing Trump (I agree)"! And nothing here says Ann Coulter has evidence that Jared Kushner wrote the anonymous op-ed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Ann Coulter has been 100% loyal to the American public on immigration issues. Kushner has not.

---

And sometimes Ann Coulter is critical of the President. Who do you agree with 100% of the time? I agree with the President on some things and disagree with him on other things. Likewise with Ann Coulter. If I disagree with them on one issue, should I throw them under the bus?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

So the choice on who to side with here is very easy for anyone truly on our side of the debate.

---

I do not support conservatives when they are wrong, in my opinion. For Ann Coulter to allege that he wrote that op-ed is as dirty as Dianne Feinstein making an allegation against Brett Kavanaugh based on an anonymous claim from an anonymous source that she sat on through the Hearing. It is a tactic to discredit without presenting facts. I am not a Lemming following the party line in lockstep!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MW

Please be direct with your response. Thank you.

---

NO! I gave my opinion just as you gave yours. I don't disagree that Kushner is someone who does not support my opinion of immigration and other topics. But that doesn't not make him pure evil.

Ok Jtdc, you don't agree with me or Ann Coulter on this one. Got it. Thanks for your opinion.

I really think it was either Jared Kushner or someone Trump hired because Kushner and Ivanka got them on board. And even if it was not Kushner, it is someone that thinks like him and the Bush faction.

So I don't really care one bit if we have the "smoking gun" or not. Because if you wait to have the smoking gun in politics, that means the bullet is already in your chest!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Because if you wait to have the smoking gun in politics, that means the bullet is already in your chest!

---

True in real life as well. And if you convict the wrong person, the real killer is still out there!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jtdc

True in real life as well. And if you convict the wrong person, the real killer is still out there!

---

Jared Kushner is guilty as charged of being a lifelong Democrat who supports Amnesty for illegal aliens and many other liberal causes and most likely only sees his father-in-law Trump's Presidency as a meal ticket to more money and power.

Please don't take up for Kushner here. Everyone at ALIPAC is trying to go after every illegal alien Amnesty backer we can and to try to get them from influencing Trump as they currently are.

The pro-Amnesty RINOs and Democrats are calling the shots with Trump's immigration policies, not the base conservative Americans who elected him.

We are fighting back as best we can and so is Ann Coulter. So please don't defend them here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Jared Kushner is guilty as charged of being a lifelong Democrat who supports Amnesty for illegal aliens and many other liberal causes and most likely only sees his father-in-law Trump's Presidency as a meal ticket to more money and power.

---

Therefore all Democrats are guilty!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Please don't take up for Kushner here.

---

I AM NOT SUPPORTING KUSHNER! I AM SUPPORTING JUSTICE. We have Kavanaugh being put in the position of defending against something undefined with no evidence that he was involved. From the Democrat position, he is guilt, only because he is associated, politically, with President Trump! Now you want to condemn Kushner because Ann Coulter "thinks" he may have done it. No evidence that he did. IS THAT NOT WHAT LYNCHING IS ABOUT?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Everyone at ALIPAC is trying to go after every illegal alien Amnesty backer we can and to try to get them from influencing Trump as they currently are.

The pro-Amnesty RINOs and Democrats are calling the shots with Trump's immigration policies, not the base conservative Americans who elected him.

We are fighting back as best we can and so is Ann Coulter. So please don't defend them here.

---

IF CONDEMNING PEOPLE FOR WHAT THEY HAVEN'T DONE JUST TO BRING THEM DOWN FOR WHAT THEY ADVOCATE IS WHAT ALIPAC IS ABOUT, COUNT ME OUT! I am against illegal aliens getting amnesty or any residency in this country. But if conservatives start lynching liberals just because they are liberal, liberals will start lynching conservatives just because they are conservative. Many already advocate that. The result will be another civil war.

Quote:

---

IS THAT NOT WHAT LYNCHING IS ABOUT?

---

We have a strong rule against race baiting here at ALIPAC. Please refer to Rule #1 you agreed to when you created an account here.
https://www.alipac.us/f12/alipac-rul...ps-area-23497/


Also, I already told you that we all get it you disagree with this article and my position. I also told you to drop it.

So you seem to feel the rules of ALIPAC and my direct instructions do not apply to you and you are mistaken.

I'm banning your account for two weeks. If you decide to return, any further violations of our rules or refusal to follow moderator guidance will result in a permanent ban of your account.

Apologies to the good people who post here. However, on September 19, 2018, when trying to log on, I received the following message:

You have been banned for the following reason: rule violation and failure to follow moderator instructions
Date the ban will be lifted: 10-03-2018, 08:00 AM

This was all. No explanation of what rules were violated, no specification of what was written that violated rules, and no clue as to which thread(s) this alleged violation took place. Since this was one of the last threads I posted in, prior to being banned, I am left to speculate. My conclusion is that there are some in the administration with a sinister agenda, and that being against illegal aliens is just a cover for that agenda.

This "explanation" for the ban is about as cowardly as Christine Blasey Ford's accusation against Judge Kavanaugh, lacking a date, place, and other supporting data. Or worse, as the conviction and punishment was done without identifying the crime.

Since I was banned without an explanation, I could not log on until now. So I was unable to see your explanation, much less respond to it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

We have a strong rule against race baiting here at ALIPAC. Please refer to Rule #1 you agreed to when you created an account here.

---

AND WHERE DID I BRING RACE INTO THE DISCUSSION? "Lynching" is not about race, although racism was the excuse often for lynchings.


Rule #1:

Quote:

---

1. Language & hatred: No obscene language or racially derogatory comments are allowed. This includes symbols that stand for profanity used to replace letters in profane words. (!&^#*#)

---

Um, I see many posters replacing one letter in a four-letter word to convey the word without the software blocking the word. Yet the moderators don't see fit to enforce that rule on them. I have never used such words. I have also never used racially derogatory words!

Quote:

---

NO RACISM AND NO RACE BAITING

RACE BAITING= "ACCUSING OTHERS OF BEING RACIST without evidence IN AN EFFORT TO SILENCE OR LOWER THE TONE OF THE DEBATE"

---

WHERE HAVE I ACCUSED OTHERS OF BEING RACIST?

Quote:

---

I also told you to drop it.

---

REALLY? I have searched and found no such warning.

The rules here are apparently subjective, with different rules for those liked by the administration, rather than objective where the same rules apply to all.

So not knowing the true agenda behind this forum, I guess I don't choose to be associated with it. I did enjoy some of the conversations.

Hi jtdc, I'm glad to see you back and hope you stick around, even if things happen you don't understand. We're a lobbying organization with a mission to stop illegal immigration. Sometimes our individual views on the forum might adversely impact that mission, which is why things are done that might not seem right in a free speech context. Don't take it personally is the best I can say about it, and I've been banned many times, so I know how it feels, just move past it. The mission is more important.

:)

Jared Kushner Helped Top Democratic Senator Lobby WH For DACA Amnesty

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Judy

Hi jtdc, I'm glad to see you back and hope you stick around, even if things happen you don't understand. We're a lobbying organization with a mission to stop illegal immigration. Sometimes our individual views on the forum might adversely impact that mission, which is why things are done that might not seem right in a free speech context. Don't take it personally is the best I can say about it, and I've been banned many times, so I know how it feels, just move past it. The mission is more important.

:)

---

jtdc wont be sticking around. He violated our rules on race baiting, continued to hound people on here after I gave him a direct instruction to back off. Now he's out for good.

If a moderator or admin gives someone an instruction on our boards, please follow it. We rarely do that, but when we do it is important.

jtdc banned permanently.

reasons.. race baiting (I find the use of the term lynching to be mostly associated with the murder of blacks in the south after the civil war), failure to follow mod instructions (i told him we had his point and to not keep badgering us in this thread and he failed to listen or respond), and being a jerk.....

Coming back on and posting these comments about his ban is a real jerk move and I have no tolerance for it and we all have more important things to do than spend our time and energy trying to manage or deal with someone that acts like jtdc

Has Jared Kushner Conspired to Defraud America?