Thread: American Boycott Against (MOD EDIT) Illegal Imm

I call to you for an immediate and indefinate boycott against (MOD EDIT) illegal immigrants. Close your walletsto thier businesses and services. If you enter a business and you see either all or most of the employees are (MOD EDIT) leave

Welcome angel

Many Americans are afraid to get out. We don't have the media on our side. They do. There are so many in support of this. Americans citizens will have to get together in huge numbers and that just is not happening.

They are getting together in huge numbers. But, haven't as yet done so in protests. There has been a tremendious amount of work behind the scences in contacting representatives and the president daily. Petetions and polls. Research to find the truths threw the propaganda.

But, i have to agree that I think the time is near to make ourselves more visable. Seems that is the only thing that gets media attention anymore. Many ralleys planned for May 5th and 6th. So check them out and see if there are any in your area tyhat you would be able to attend. We have listings of alot of events taking off at that time period.

Angel, I don't think we would do well to target businesses based on the ethnicity of the employees. Our focus is on re-establishing the RULE OF LAW - not on raising up the ugly head of ethnic discrimination.

Our discrimination needs to be focused on whether the business is law-abiding and unsupportive of the ANTI-RULE-OF-LAW RALLIES. It certainly is our right as consumers to discriminate between law-abiding and law-breaking establishments. We are not able to hold court on an establishment to know whether they have broken the law or not - we are not expert document readers and its unlikely any documents would be presented for our scrutiny at any rate. WE can only go by our perceptions as to the sympathies of the business.

So it seems if a business closes in sympathy to rallies that are held to PROTEST THE UPHOLDING OF THE LAW, we can assume they are sympathetic to law-breaking. These would be the companies we boycott.

Even if the employees who take off to attend ANTI-RULE-OF-LAW RALLIES are legal, they still express sympathy to law-breaking instead of to the respect for American Law. The employer who is harboring and encouraging such employees by refraining from firing them is guilty by association of sympathy with law-breaking.

Fortunately, we as consumers don't have to provide any proof of law-breaking to perceive it in the behavior of a company or its employees. Therefore, we are within our rights to boycott a business that SEEMS to be sympathetic to the cause of lawlessness.

AS FOR ME, I WILL PATRONIZE ONLY COMPANIES THAT DO NOT HAVE ANY PERSONNEL PROBLEMS ON MAY 1ST and otherwise have no known sympathies with the breaking of our laws.

(MOD EDIT)