Thread: Hispanic channel Telemundo

In the Hispanic news they are saying that now illegal aliens with deportation will have the a chance to become legal US citizens.

I wonder and wonder is this for real


Every day I hear good news for illegal aliens in the hispanic channels... why?

Originally Posted by Xochi

In the Hispanic news they are saying that now illegal aliens with deportation will have the a chance to become legal US citizens.

I wonder and wonder is this for real


Every day I hear good news for illegal aliens in the hispanic channels... why?

Ya they have a chance to become citizens if they go home for like 10 years and then apply LEGALLY to enter the country BEHIND everyone else who has already applied to come here legally.

They are probably reading too much into the situation from an announcement that a Supreme Court decision means asylum seekers can make additional appeals.

They have a case about people whose American spouses died but I don't know of anything else.

Dixie

Originally Posted by Xochi

In the Hispanic news they are saying that now illegal aliens with deportation will have the a chance to become legal US citizens.

I wonder and wonder is this for real


Every day I hear good news for illegal aliens in the hispanic channels... why?

Telemundo tells their own version of the truth I guess because they think most of their viewers are unable to read or understand English. Obviously these "Mexican" channels, since they don't represent most Hispanics, just want to increase their illegal alien viewership.

Here is the truth:

Supreme Court eases deportation rules

By Audrey Hudson (Contact) | Wednesday, April 22, 2009


Illegal immigrants can temporarily avoid deportation while appealing such action through the judicial system, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

Jean Marc Nken of Cameroon overstayed his visa in 2001 and applied for asylum but his requests were denied.

In a 7-2 decision written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., the court ruled that Mr. Nken's request to delay deportation was wrongly held to a "demanding standard" of proof. The justices sent the case back to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Justices Samuel A. Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented, and said the court's decision nullifies "an important statutory provision that Congress enacted when it reformed the immigration laws in 1996," Judge Alito wrote.

Mr. Nken sought asylum in 2003 saying he had been arrested and beaten in Cameroon for pro-democracy activities but his petition was denied. He has since married an American citizen and has an American-born child.

Meanwhile, the court heard arguments in a case that claims white firefighters in Connecticut were discriminated against when tests for promotions were scuttled because no blacks qualified for open posts.

The justices appeared split on whether the city of New Haven was right to set the tests aside for fear that the black firefighters would sue for violating Title VII of the 1963 Civil Rights Act if the white firemen were promoted.

The lawsuit, Ricci v. Destefano, was filed against the city in 2005 by 19 white firefighters and one Hispanic firefighter.

The justices must decide whether city governments can ignore job tests that would disproportionately promote more white applicants than minority applicants, based on fears they would be accused of racial discrimination.

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/ap ... um-claims/

Amazing that they hear only what they want to hear and then cry foul if it does not unfold in the way they expected.