Thread: Crimalizing Peace

From Brasschecktv.com video from Fresno Ca of a group of local protesters..

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/353.html

Kathyet

God help us. Unbelievable. Criminal illegals are jumping the fence, over staying their visits, stealing documents, taking welfare and social services, dropping anchors, selling drugs in our neighborhoods, commiting rapes and robbing houses and are involved in a host of criminal activities and the gov't uses OUR tax dollars to go after a sweet group of people that really want to better their community in a non-acorn way??????????? Why???????????

Evil has descended on America.

Originally Posted by ELE

God help us. Unbelievable. Criminal illegals are jumping the fence, over staying their visits, stealing documents, taking welfare and social services, dropping anchors, selling drugs in our neighborhoods, commiting rapes and robbing houses and are involved in a host of criminal activities and the gov't uses OUR tax dollars to go after a sweet group of people that really want to better their community in a non-acorn way??????????? Why???????????

Evil has descended on America.

This evil and those who have perpetrated it upon the country will soon be at the receiving end of the retribution of the American people. Tick, tick, tick...

Appalling....to say the least.

Amazing that our tax dollars pay, for our own police, sheriff and government to spy on US, while there are nut cases infiltrating our military and mass murdering our citizens and soldiers, and we have absolute evidence that terrorists from other nations are coming across our borders, potentially every day.

Got to stop them cookie eaters!

You know, those might be "special cookies" thus the reason for the sheriffs office to have an infitrator paid with Homeland Security dollars.....

Tells you how paranoid the government has become, of it's own citizens. So, this shows us that the government has had too much control of us in the past, and fear losing control, thus having to meddle in groups and personal lives to find out the motives. Stalinism at it's best.

From Wikipedia:

Stalinism is a term that refers to a "theory and practice of communism" utilised in the political system associated with Joseph Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union from 1928–1953.[1] The term refers to a form of government which was inherently oppressive with extensive government spying, extrajudicial punishment, and political "purging", or elimination of political opponents either by direct killing, through exile or by the use of labour camps known as the Gulag. It involves a state making extensive use of propaganda to establish a personality cult around an absolute dictator to maintain control over the population and to maintain political control for the Communist Party. The term was originally coined in a positive sense by Lazar Kaganovich, but nonetheless rejected by Stalin himself.[citation needed

Hmm...does this not sound like what we are seeing the beginnings of? Certainly not the outright killings or camps, so far, but many other indicators shows us that we could be headed this way, and need to be watchful and diligent in our fight.

These people just don't get it do they..they never stop...from their homeland security to indoctrinating our kids in school to the banking system..it just goes on and on

Now this with Dodd

Dodd was the one who pushed the bail-outs..to begin with now he and his cronies want to push this..he needs to go!!!!


[quote] Dodd Unveils Tough Regulatory Reform Bill
Legislation would merge regulators, crack down on big banks
By Stacy Kaper, American Banker
November 10, 2009
¦
Advertisement

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd launched a tough opening salvo Tuesday in the regulatory reform debate, unveiling legislation that would go well beyond other plans to redraw the financial services regulatory map.

The bill would strip the Federal Reserve Board of its supervisory responsibilities for bank holding companies and state member banks, returning it to an entity designed primarily to conduct monetary policy. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., too, would lose its supervisory responsibilities, and serve solely as a deposit insurer and agency that handles resolutions.

All bank supervision would be conducted by a new agency, the Financial Institutions Regulatory Administration.

The bill sets the stage for several major battles. It goes much further than a bill by House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, which would merge the OCC and OTS, and is likely to infuriate community bankers who fear a single regulator could destroy the dual banking system.

Similarly, large firms may oppose the creation of a new systemic risk regulator, the Financial Stability Agency, because it is explicitly allowed to break up large and complex banking organizations.

Additionally, the bill's new consumer financial protection agency would erode any form of federal preemption, allowing states to set and enforce tougher consumer protection standards against national and state banks.

Under the bill, the new banking regulator, FIRA, would be led by a five member board headed by an independent chairman who would be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The rest of the board would include a vice chairman representing state banking expertise, two independent directors, and the heads of the Fed and FDIC.

The bill explicitly says the new agency must seek to preserve the dual banking system and must establish a consolidated community bank division.

The consolidated agency is meant to circumvent charter shopping and improve accountability by having ultimate responsibility fall on the agency's head.

The bill would establish a systemic risk agency that would have rulewriting authority but no supervision power. It would include nine members, governed by an independent chair and include the heads of the Fed, Treasury, FDIC, FIRA, the consumer protection agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

The council would be staffed by a group of economists, accountants, lawyers, former supervisors, and other specialists. It would have the power to break up systemically risky firms, force them to increase their capital, and limit their growth.

It would also require institutions to issue long-term hybrid debt securities to set up capital reserves to be tapped during an emergency.

The legislation would require large, complex companies to draft emergency plans should the company go insolvent. The plans would have to detail their orderly shutdown. Penalties for failing to provide “funeral plansâ€