Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: We need some lawyers!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
04-26-2008, 04:54 PM #1
We need some lawyers!
I am not a lawyer and I am NOT giving out legal advice but:
The last time I checked illegal immigration was still a violation of federal law--as well as crimes that might be committed by Americans--harboring, concealing, assisting. Don't victims have some rights under tort law? Illegal aliens are also considered a danger by such notable legal authorities as THE US STATE DEPARTMENT!! Can one sue for emotional distress in federal court?
And who said that concealing an alien has to mean hiding him/her away in some underground bunker? When they are in any building aren't they concealed from public view? And aren't all illegal aliens placed in the same category--whether you're concealing Osama bin Laden or Sister Maria Carlos Juanita Nguyen Chang from the Tegucigalpa Orphans's Home?"Men of low degree are vanity, Men of high degree are a lie. " David
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
04-26-2008, 06:16 PM #2
Lawyers are as plentiful as dishwashers....the question is who will put their butt on the line to make a difference?
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
04-27-2008, 04:44 PM #3
Captain, I have asked the same question and have yet to understand why lawsuits aren't being filed over Illegal Immigration. IT'S AGAINST THE LAW SO WHY IS IT BEING TOLERATED ON SUCH AN ENORMOUS SCALE?
I also wonder why Californians haven't file class action lawsuits against the city of Los Angeles, San Francisco, etc. Clearly the law is on their side?!!...I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...
William Barret Travis
Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836
-
04-27-2008, 04:48 PM #4AprilGuestIT'S AGAINST THE LAW SO WHY IS IT BEING TOLERATED ON SUCH AN ENORMOUS SCALE?
-
04-27-2008, 05:44 PM #5Originally Posted by TexasBorn
So now I am looking at the Immigration Reform and Control Act in a dry, matter of fact way. If people from a country we were at war with entered this country illegally we would immediately seize them. But the Act doesn't make any distinction--all are in the same category. Moreover, it is not up to us to define what words like harboring, concealing, assisting, referring for employment, etc. mean. That was left up to the writers of the Act--and normally they have to figure for any and all situations that this could occur in. So it seems that "harboring" could have a very broad definition.
As to why governments haven't been sued it seems like an injunctive suit would succeed. I don't know if anyone could collect damages in a tort, but an injunction to challenge certain governmental actions might work. Especially as more courts rule that localities can do what would ordinarily be a federal responsibility. I know it is very hard to find conservative lawyers"Men of low degree are vanity, Men of high degree are a lie. " David
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
JOE BIDEN WANTS TO BRING IN GAZA RESIDENTS AND GIVE THEM...
05-02-2024, 01:19 PM in Videos about Illegal Immigration, refugee programs, globalism, & socialism