Thread: Romney, Gingrich or Obama

1.) Mitt Romney
2.) Newt Gingrich
3.) Barak Obama

Barring an unexpected miracle, one of these three people will almost certainly be elected president a year from now. That's just the cards we've been dealt. So I'm very curious who the people at ALIPAC will be supporting. Or will it be: 4.) None of the above?

Is ALIPAC going to be a unified force in this election? Or is our vote going to be fragmented and a non-factor?

I would vote for Caligula's horse before I would vote for Obama. FOr me it is not a vote for someone as much as a desire to see Obama defeated.

Anyone other then Obama,sadly we have little choice.

Not Newt! Not Odrama! Last man standing!

I'll hold my nose and vote for Romney strickly as a vote AGAINST Obama

I think Romney would be more likely to pick up Democratic and independent voters. His religion doesn't give me much of a problem since I don't expect him to make presidential decisions based upon the book of Mormon. I don't know if the swell of support for Newt is just a passing fancy, like the short lived support for others before him; seems like the man has some extra baggage to deal with, that Romney doesn't have.

Originally Posted by Acebackwords

Is AIPAC going to be a unified force in this election? Or is our vote going to be fragmented and a non-factor?

AIPAC is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, America's pro-Israel lobby,

ALIPAC is a political action committee focused upon reducing illegal immigration as much as possible.

ALIPAC is not a political candidate campaign focused upon electing a specific Presidential candidate.

Of course, publishing candidates' voting records quickly shows where they stand on illegal immigration.

I think Newt Gingrich may have shot himself in the foot with illegal immigration, as Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) did.
Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) and Ron Paul (R-TX) are strongly opposed to illegal immigration.

If Mr. Obama were reelected, I don't think that he would offer the Mus|im Brotherhood the United States
for a base . . . but I can't be sure; you just never know about these things.

Michele Bachmann.......Got to move her to the top baby!
Anyone serious in this fight should see the only one telling it like it is.
On illegal immigration Michele Bachmann kicks all the lame-stream/brain RINO'S wimpy asses.

In 2008, I voted for Romney after Hunter and Tancredo dropped out of the race. In 2012, I'll probably vote for Romney after Bachmann drops out of the race.

That worm Newt will only get my vote during the general election. It's been really bugging me lately how he's been trying to make people feel guilty for believing that illegals who have been here for 25 should be held accountable to the rule of law when we Alipacers know that 25 years ago was coincidentally the last time career politicians like Newt managed to pass a massive amnesty. He thinks we're stupid. Guys like Rove and Newt want to pass a massive amnesty every generation so there's always a fresh supply of young cheap labor that can keep the federal government's Ponzi schemes going.

Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC

Originally Posted by Acebackwords

Is AIPAC going to be a unified force in this election? Or is our vote going to be fragmented and a non-factor?

[size=14]
AIPAC is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, America's pro-Israel lobby,

Pardon my spelling error. I meant ALIPAC. By the way, I'm well familiar with AIPAC and can't say I'm a fan. But you have to admire their position on immigration re Israel. I often point out to my liberal Jewish friends: Liberal Jews have been among the strongest supporters of liberal immigration laws in virtually every country they reside in. Except for Israel. Which has very conservative and restrictive immigration laws.