Thread: Needing your voting advice

My mother always said when she voted that when it came to two candidates that weren't so great, to vote for the lesser of two evils.

What do you think? Is it better to vote for the lesser of the two evils or, not to vote for either one of them?

In this election I considered several things to chose a candidate.

One; are they for Amnesty ? Anyone who is for Amnesty will not serve and protect "We The People" .

Two; Do I want Dems to retain leadership in Congress ?

Three; Do I want Dems in power If another Supreme court justice leaves the court and Obama gets to chose another justice ?

It is tough if ou have 2 rotten candidates so I just chose which party I want in power instead.

always vote for the lesser of two evils ..

even if you don't like the lesser , you can hope that because they won , next election someone else seeing that the candiate won will run on a more extream platform in order to get elected , so one day you COULD see the kind of canditaes you want ..

THANK YOU!

I never did like the lesser of two evils option. I don't consider myself a member of either party. I generally tend to vote for the one who I think is going to do the best job based on their record and what they say. I have on occasion voted for none of the choices but I was never sure whether that was the right thing to do or not.

I go for the lesser of two evils. Maybe in the process they will realize what is really at stake and want to do what is right so they can get voted in again. Atleast that is what I would do. But if they are pretty bad equally then I go for the party.

I would tend to go along with USPatriot
But as you said, I too vote for the one who I think may do the right thing and work for the people and not the elites and corporations.

AND one that DEFINITELY would see it only RIGHT and PROPER to protect our borders and hold employers accountable for hiring illegals.