Thread: PAC has an administrator that is a RON PAUL supporter

Holy Batman another one is gone

PAC administrator deleting any post that has anything that shows RON PAUL true stand on illegal immigration which includes his own word/videos

Once_A_Democrat wrote:

Holy Batman another one is gone

PAC administrator deleting any post that has anything that shows RON PAUL true stand on illegal immigration which includes his own word/videos

I just contacted a moderator regarding the problem. Nothing wrong with being a Paul supporter (it's all about choice), however, the view point of those that have concerns about him shouldn't be deleted.

Originally Posted by Once_A_Democrat

Holy Batman another one is gone

PAC administrator deleting any post that has anything that shows RON PAUL true stand on illegal immigration which includes his own word/videos

Actually, NO.

We are going to have to come up with new rules here folks because between the Ron Paul supporters and the Ron Paul detractors on the boards here at ALIPAC things are becoming problematic.

Each of you needs to remember that the Discussion Groups are of ALIPAC's website is just a small component of our national operations.

Your posts, are very appreciated, but just a small component of the Discussion Groups.

We have the entire organization to think of and we have the moderator time and attention factor to think of.

No other PAC's have an open source board like this.

The Ron Paul supporters and detractors are posing a new host of challenges here at ALIPAC.

The assumption of bias is wrong.

Please be ready for an advisory on this and please be ready to honor the rules of engagement when released.

W

Can we get an explanation of why the threads were deleted? The one that was deleted this morning was clean. There was no name calling, demeaning language, etc. Everyone was being respectful and the debate was informative for all involved. Thanks.

Originally Posted by MW

Can we get an explanation of why the threads were deleted? The one that was deleted this morning was clean. There was no name calling, demeaning language, etc. Everyone was being respectful and the debate was informative for all involved. Thanks.

Oh, come on, MW! Get real, whydontcha. Why do you think I stopped watching that thread? Because you guys were character-assassinating each other. It was getting real nasty! This is not the site to do that.

I agree with W.

I concur. I was finding it very difficult to come here knowing that MW was character assasinating and posting disingenius posts, and then when called out on it, he'd just say "oh, I didn't know that..." Or not fully reading bills/legislation and erroneoulsy posting and requiring others to defend against his post.

Good call. I found that MW and others are very worried about Ron Paul, and are trying to do what the MSM does because 'they' are worried.

Freedom is popular.

I am with the moderators as I was finding myself coming here to defend against fearful voters rather than finding out the latest/greatest in regards to illegal immigration.

Ex_OC wrote:

Oh, come on, MW! Get real, whydontcha. Why do you think I stopped watching that thread? Because you guys were character-assassinating each other. It was getting real nasty! This is not the site to do that.

I agree with W.

Please read this portion of my post again:

The one that was deleted this morning was clean. There was no name calling, demeaning language, etc.

I believe you're talking about different thread(s) that were posted previously to the specific one I was talking about in my post. Aren't you talking about the one that was several pages long?

BrightNail wrote:

I concur. I was finding it very difficult to come here knowing that MW was character assasinating and posting disingenius posts, and then when called out on it, he'd just say "oh, I didn't know that..." Or not fully reading bills/legislation and erroneoulsy posting and requiring others to defend against his post.

Hmmm......talk about character assassinations and disingenuous posts. If your going to challenge my character and integrity, how about providing some evidence to substantiate your claims? I challenge you to show one incident, just one, where I made an erroneous post regarding Ron Paul!

Originally Posted by BrightNail

I concur. I was finding it very difficult to come here knowing that MW was character assasinating and posting disingenius posts, and then when called out on it, he'd just say "oh, I didn't know that..." Or not fully reading bills/legislation and erroneoulsy posting and requiring others to defend against his post.

Good call. I found that MW and others are very worried about Ron Paul, and are trying to do what the MSM does because 'they' are worried.

Freedom is popular.

I am with the moderators as I was finding myself coming here to defend against fearful voters rather than finding out the latest/greatest in regards to illegal immigration.

W and Ex-OC both said that the problems were stemming from both pro and anti-Ron. Nobody should take any false security in perceived exoneration. I have not been nasty. If direct quotes and votes from Ron are nasty, then take it up with him. Because that is all I have provided.

I am not worried, nor fearful.....Other than Paul by some miracle winning, and then doing very little about the immigration crises.

I want an open and honest discussion about immigration, and Paul's stance on it. I want some answers. Maybe you can provide them. NO personal attacks. NO ad hominem. NO strawman attacks. Just simple and direct honesty.

--Will Ron Paul put military on the border?

--Will Ron Paul put up a fence on the border?

--Will Ron paul punish employers for hiring illegals?

These are not loaded questions, they are what America wants and needs to know. Please answer simply and directly. Please no page-long answers. It should not take a page to answer these questions. Tancredo and Hunter would answer them in a few sentences. Please no strawman attacks. Please no accusations of "fear." Please just answer these questions.

..while Rome is burning....

IF, and that's BIG IF, Ron Paul was the candidate, I would vote for him. I would really like to see Hunter or Tancredo in. If absolutely worse comes to worse, and none of these three win, the only other person I could vote for would be Romney. I don't trust him completely, but I don't trust Thompson any futher then I could throw him! Guiliani would be monstrous! Doesn't leave much in the way of choice.