Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member ruthiela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Sophia, NC
    Posts
    1,482

    Easley asks N.C. delegation to reject guard federalization

    http://www.wbt.com/news/detail_wbt.cfm; ... e_id=27570

    Raleigh, NC, 09/19/2006

    Easley asks N.C. delegation to reject guard federalization change

    Associated Press

    Gov. Mike Easley has asked North Carolina's congressional delegation to reject efforts to put the state's National Guard under federal control during disasters.

    In a letter sent Monday to the delegation, Easley said the proposal would make it difficult for North Carolina and other states to respond quickly to crises such as hurricanes.

    Proposed language in the House version of the National Defense Authorization Act allowing a president to federalize state guards without governors' consent in the event of a ``serious natural or manmade disaster, accident or catastrophe'' would confuse the chain of command as well, Easley said.

    ``The current process works well, and involving the federal government in the command structure unduly jeopardizes North Carolina's ability to protect its citizens,'' Easley wrote. ``I am not willing to jeopardize public safety and abandon my constitutional duty to federal control.''

    The bill is in a conference committee, where differences between House and Senate versions are being worked out. Easley, who is a lead state executive on National Guard issues for the National Governors Association, said the nation's governors are united in opposing federalization of troops.

    Under existing law, governors are commanders of the Guard in their states. The president must get their consent to federalize the troops domestically, except in cases of rebellion.

    (Copyright 2006 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
    END OF AN ERA 1/20/2009

  2. #2
    Senior Member sippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Posts
    3,798
    I am not willing to jeopardize public safety and abandon my constitutional duty
    It would be nice if our traitor and chief thought this way.
    This is stupid to have the feds control the use of the Guard. The feds can't get immigration or damn near anything else right, so why give them control over this as well!
    "Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same results is the definition of insanity. " Albert Einstein.

  3. #3
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,800
    I agree. We do not need to bestow any new powers on the Executive Branch since the Executive Branch is currently out of the control of the public, Congress, and American citizenry.

    W
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member Dianne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,858
    Just another step towards a dictatorship.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •