Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,928

    Bringing Children's Health Care to Calif. (at Fed. Expense)

    Here's how we all may end up paying to insure the health of California's children: "Every dollar the state invests in children's health care, including the First 5 and foundation dollars, can be matched by $2 in federal funds."!


    Editorial: How to make children's health care a priority in California

    Mercury News Editorial
    Posted: 12/06/2008 10:56:38 PM PST

    California's new Senate leader, Darrell Steinberg, wants to prove in his first 120 days in office that the California Legislature actually can accomplish something, despite recent evidence to the contrary. Scoring a breakthrough on children's health insurance by the end of April would be a huge step in the right direction and a great down payment on Steinberg's leadership record.

    Of the state's 10 million kids, 800,000 now are uninsured.

    Basic health care for every child should be considered as essential as public education. It won't be easy to accomplish, given the state's huge budget shortfall, immigration issues and the resistance of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who essentially has held children's coverage hostage to his broader goal of comprehensive health care reform. But Steinberg's strategy has the best chance of any that have been tried since Schwarzenegger took office.

    A key selling point is that Steinberg is not trying tap the state's general fund, which would be a nonstarter, given an $11 billion deficit. Instead, the Sacramento Democrat hopes to induce the California Children and Families Commission, also known as First 5, and two or three foundations to contribute $50 million each to jump-start the program. First 5 controls tobacco tax money from Proposition 10 in 1998.

    This wouldn't be enough to cover every uninsured child, but it would be major progress. Every dollar the state invests in children's health care,
    including the First 5 and foundation dollars, can be matched by $2 in federal funds. Coupled with President-elect Barack Obama's strong desire to insure more children, California could insure hundreds of thousands in the next year.

    We're hearing that Steinberg has been in talks with the governor, who always has championed preventive medicine programs for Californians of all ages to reduce long-term costs. Perhaps including these kinds of reforms will tip the scales for Schwarzenegger to support children's health insurance.

    Some Californians don't want to pay for this program because they believe that most uninsured children are here illegally. But studies show that 80 percent of the uninsured are legal residents. And regardless of immigration status, the public ends up paying the bill when children are taken to hospital emergency rooms for problems that a family doctor could have treated for a tenth of the cost. In addition, kids' performance in school drops significantly when they don't have regular checkups by doctors and dentists — another public cost.

    Steinberg's bill, SB 1, co-authored by Senate Health Committee Chair Elaine Alquist, D-San Jose, isn't the ultimate solution. That will require comprehensive reforms, which are most likely to come from Washington. But it's wrong to make vulnerable children wait for the perfect answer when California can do something now. Let's hope Steinberg can make it happen.

    http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_11159545
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Paige's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Salt Lake City Utah
    Posts
    2,847
    If we have to bailout California it will be no different then bailing out our automakers and mortgage companies. The automakers and mortgage companies made their beds and California has done the same. I dare Arnold to take care of his own state without the help of any tax payers dollars of citizens who do not live there. California is dying because of their sanctuary policies and catering to the Mexican Government. Each and every state who is asking for a bailout is also catering to illegal's. It is about time that corporations live a little more in the real world and not so much in the illegal immigrant world that expects we the middle class should just keep fittin the bill for this garbage.
    <div>''Life's tough......it's even tougher if you're stupid.''
    -- John Wayne</div>

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Unoccupied Southeast Georgia But Not For Much Longer
    Posts
    1,174
    Meanwhile Mexifornia faces an 18 billion dollar deficit and gets sucked further into the black hole. Expect tax payers to eventually pay every penny they make to support open borders, cheap illegal labor and illegal alien votes to keep the drug cartel thugs masquerading as representatives of the American people seated at the table of power. I would say god help us all but I think even divine intervention would be of little help at this juncture.
    There is no freedom without the law. Remember our veterans whose sacrifices allow us to live in freedom.

  4. #4
    Senior Member koobster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,699
    GOD help us all.
    Proud to be an AMERICAN

  5. #5
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    They are all brainless!!
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •