Thread: Gov. would OK law change for Kennedy successor

ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!!!

BOSTON (AP) - Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick said Wednesday he would support changing state law to allow him to appoint an interim successor to Sen. Edward Kennedy's seat while a special election is held.

Unlike most states, a successor to a vacant U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts is chosen by special election, not appointed by the governor.

In a recent letter to lawmakers, Kennedy, who died Tuesday night, said the law should be changed to allow the governor to appoint someone to serve in the Senate during the course of the election—provided that person pledge not to run for the seat.

In radio interviews Wednesday morning, Patrick called the idea "entirely reasonable" and told WBUR-FM that he would sign the bill if it reached his desk.

"Massachusetts needs two voices" in the Senate, Patrick said.

Although Massachusetts is dominated by Democrats, a change in the law isn't a sure thing.

Senate President Therese Murray and House Speaker Robert DeLeo, both Democrats, issued statements of condolence early Wednesday, but neither has expressed support for giving the governor the power to name an interim successor. Republicans in both chambers, who hold about 10 percent of legislative seats in Massachusetts, oppose the idea.

Without the change, Senate Democrats could potentially fall one vote short on any health care overhaul legislation, were such a bill brought up before the special election. Health care had been Kennedy's core issue for decades.

Democrats hold a potentially filibuster-proof margin in the Senate, but some moderate Democrats have been wavering. Another Democrat, Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, has been seriously ill and often absent.

Any change in state law is not likely to happen immediately. Lawmakers are not expected to return to formal sessions until after Labor Day.

State law requires a special election for the seat no sooner than 145 days and no later than 160 days after a vacancy occurs. The law bans an interim appointee.

The clock for a special election is triggered either on the date of a resignation or the incumbent's death. It's up to the governor to pick the exact date of the election.

Any race to succeed Kennedy would be crowded and fiercely fought.

Despite speculation that Kennedy's wife, Vicki, could assume his Senate seat, family aides have said she is not interested in replacing her husband either temporarily or permanently. One of Kennedy's nephews, former Rep. Joseph P. Kennedy II, has also been described as interested.

Other potential Democratic candidates include state Attorney General Martha Coakley, U.S. Reps. Stephen Lynch, Michael Capuano, Edward Markey, James McGovern and William Delahunt, and former Rep. Martin Meehan, now chancellor of the University of Massachusetts at Lowell.

On the Republican side, potential candidates include Cape Cod businessman Jeff Beatty, former Lt. Gov. Kerry Healey, former U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan, state Sen. Scott Brown and Chris Egan, former U.S. ambassador to the Organization for Cooperation and Development.

The succession law was changed in 2004, when Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., became his party's presidential nominee and Republican Mitt Romney was the state's governor. Before the change, the governor would have appointed a replacement to serve until the next general election.

That would have created the opportunity for Romney to install a fellow Republican in office, a move that Democrats who control the state legislature sought to prevent.

Last week, Kennedy asked Massachusetts lawmakers to change state law to give Patrick, a fellow supporter of President Barack Obama and a backer of Obama's health care overhaul, the ability to appoint an interim replacement should he be unable to continue serving.

"It is vital for this Commonwealth to have two voices speaking for the needs of its citizens and two votes in the Senate during the approximately five months between a vacancy and an election," Kennedy said in a letter to Patrick.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1

Liberal Dem Hypocrits.

"Do what I say, not what I do"

lmao

lets see, kennedy got it changed cuz the governor at the time was a republican. and now that the governor is a democrat it should be changed back to the way it was?

HYPOCRITE it cant be both ways

We need to get on the phones to the MA legislature and tell them to avoid the appearances of impropriety any immediate law change to accommodate Mr. Kennedy would bring.

W

DEMOCRACY HYPOCRISY!

Is it cynicism, or could you just see it coming?

What the heck do they spike the water up there with anyway?

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

We need to get on the phones to the MA legislature and tell them to avoid the appearances of impropriety any immediate law change to accommodate Mr. Kennedy would bring.

W

I'm going to get on the phones alright and ask them

WHY IN THE HELL IS KENNEDY LEGISLATING FROM THE GRAVE?????


This is crap and I can guarantee that it's going to be one vicious cycle.

Just watch what happens......the new talking points from Washington are going to be "What would Ted do?" "This is what Ted worked for" and on and on it will go ad nauseum.

I've said it before......Kennedy controlled government like a freaking mafia don because hey....if the fedora fits........and even though he's now dead, not a damned thing is going to change.

Unless we demand an end to it now, before it even starts.

We are constantly told by the oligarchy that the U S is a democratic republic. Is this the way a democratic republic makes laws?