Results 1 to 8 of 8
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: NEW CAMPAIGN LAUNCHED BY FORMER CIA, SPECIAL OPERATIONS MEMBERS TO COMBAT LEAKS

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    April
    Guest

    NEW CAMPAIGN LAUNCHED BY FORMER CIA, SPECIAL OPERATIONS MEMBERS TO COMBAT LEAKS



    NEW CAMPAIGN LAUNCHED BY FORMER CIA, SPECIAL OPERATIONS MEMBERS TO COMBAT LEAKS AND POLITICIZATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY INFO

    Kicks Off Nationwide With Release Of Documentary Short Film Titled "Dishonorable Disclosures"


    Former CIA and Special Operations members are announcing the creation of OPSEC, a new nationwide public campaign to combat the spike in leaks and politicization of Intelligence and Special Operations missions that threaten their effectiveness and the safety of Americans who conduct them.OPSEC -- short for Operational Security, meaning to eliminate or reduce the exploitation of critical information -- will begin with the release of "Dishonorable Disclosures," a new documentary short film highlighting the problem from the perspective of those who have served in these critical positions. The film will also serve as the basis for a TV and online advertising effort.

    "Intelligence and Special Operations members are angry and frustrated at how our work has been used for political advantage by officials across government, including President Obama himself who bears special responsibility as Commander in Chief," said Scott Taylor, chairman of OPSEC and a former Navy SEAL. "We want the American people to understand the cost of these leaks and politicization both on those who serve and on our national security and to hold those in positions of leadership accountable if it doesn’t stop."

    OPSEC is made up of individuals who served their country in the CIA, and Special Operations Forces (SOF) consisting of Navy SEALs, Army Special Forces, Marine Corps and Air Force Special Operations. It is organized as a 501(c)(4) nonpartisan public education campaign and is independent of any political party or campaign organization.

    The campaign will begin with the release of "Dishonorable Disclosures," a documentary short film that views the impact of the increasing number of leaks on Intelligence and Special Operations missions, tradecraft, tactics and capabilities from the perspective of those who have relied on these tools to carryout similar missions and protect themselves and those they served alongside. The film will be shown at events in key states across the country over the next several months, including Virginia, Florida, Ohio, Colorado, North Carolina and Nevada. "Dishonorable Disclosures" can be seen here.

    "Countless leaks, interviews and decisions by the Obama Administration and other government officials have undermined the success of our Intelligence and Special Operations forces and put future missions and personnel at risk," said Fred Rustmann, an OPSEC member and 24-year veteran of the Central Intelligence Agency. "OPSEC will carry a strong message across the country that it’s time for President Obama and other administration officials to stop jeopardizing national security operations for political gain."

    More information about OPSEC and news about the release of "Dishonorable Disclosures" can be found at OPSEC Team | OPSETeam.org.

    OPSEC Team | OPSETeam.org


  2. #2
    April
    Guest
    August 18, 2012 Contact: Chad Kolton
    202-789-4365


    KERRY STATEMENT FAILS TO MENTION HIS PREVIOUS CONCERNS ON OBAMA ADMINISTRATION LEAKS OR ASK WHY OBL RAID WAS USED FOR PARTISAN ATTACK AD

    WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Sen. John Kerry issued a statement last night on behalf of the Obama campaign in response to the release of "Dishonorable Disclosures" in which he failed to restate his own concerns about the negative impact of national security leaks under the Obama administration or ask why the Osama Bin Laden raid was turned into a partisan campaign commercial.

    In June, responding to concerns expressed by other U.S. senators about the unprecedented amount of leaks of classified or sensitive information, Kerry said:

    "A number of those leaks, and others in the last months about drone activities and other activities, are frankly all against national-security interests," said Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. "I think they're dangerous, damaging, and whoever is doing that is not acting in the interest of the United States of America."
    (The Hill, 6/5/12)
    "John Kerry's partisan campaign statement last night failed to acknowledge his previous concern that leaks under the Obama Administration were dangerous and damaging," said Scott Taylor, president of OPSEC. "John Kerry set aside his serious concerns about the impacts of security leaks on our country in order to issue a partisan campaign press release."

    The Kerry statement also failed to acknowledge that the Obama campaign had used the raid on Osama bin Laden, which should have been a nationally unifying event, as the basis for a highly partisan campaign commercial on the one year anniversary of the event.

    "The Obama campaign's use of the Osama bin Laden raid as the basis for a highly partisan campaign commercial demeans the service of thousands of Americans of all political views who labored for more than a decade to make the decision to launch the raid possible," said Taylor. "John Kerry demeaned that service even further by failing to condemn in -- or even mention it."

    OPSEC this week announced the release of "Dishonorable Disclosures," a documentary short film that views the impact of the increasing number of leaks on Intelligence and Special Operations missions, tradecraft, tactics and capabilities from the perspective of those who have relied on these tools to carryout similar missions and protect themselves and those they served alongside. The film will be shown at events in key states across the country over the next several months, including Virginia, Florida, Ohio, Colorado, North Carolina and Nevada. More information about OPSEC and news about the release of "Dishonorable Disclosures" can be found at OPSEC Team | OPSETeam.org.

    OPSEC Team | OPSETeam.org

  3. #3
    April
    Guest

  4. #4
    April
    Guest
    The movie Dishonorable Disclosure sends message to Obama: You didn’t build that





    message for the president
    Credits:
    Photo by Yonhap News via /Getty Imag




    A group of former U.S. intelligence and Special Forces operatives is set to launch a media campaign, including TV ads that scold President Barack Obama for taking credit for the killing of Osama bin Laden and argues that high-level leaks are endangering American lives.
    Leaders of the group, the Special Operations OPSEC Education Fund Inc., say it is nonpartisan and unconnected to any political party or presidential campaign. It is registered as a social welfare group, which means its primary purpose is to further the common good and its political activities should be secondary.
    In the past, military exploits have been turned against presidential candidates by outside groups, most famously the Swift Boat ads in 2004 that questioned Democratic nominee John Kerry's Vietnam War service.
    The OPSEC group says it is not political and aims to save American lives. Its first public salvo is a 22-minute film that can be seen here called Dishonorable Disclosure. The movie includes criticism of Obama and his administration. Some memorable quotes in the film are the following:




    Video: Dishonorable Disclosures


    "Mr. President, you did not kill Osama bin Laden, America did. The work that the American military has done killed Osama bin Laden. You did not," Ben Smith, identified as a Navy SEAL, says in the film.
    "As a citizen, it is my civic duty to tell the president to stop leaking information to the enemy," Smith continues. "It will get Americans killed."
    In the film, Scott Taylor, a U.S. Navy SEAL, and a member of Operation Iraqi Freedom, combined the fear of intelligence leaks with the raid of the Osama bin Laden compound thusly:
    “I believe that a ten-year-old would be able to understand that if you disclose how we got (to the Osama bin Laden compound), how we took down the building, what we did, how many people were there, that it’s going to hinder future operations and certainly hurt the success of those future operations for the DOD (Department of Defense), for the military, intelligence communities, and everyone as a whole.”
    The Obama administration argues that the individuals in this film have no authority to speak on these issues:
    An Obama campaign official said: "No one in this group is in a position to speak with any authority on these issues and on what impact these leaks might have, and it's clear they've resorted to making things up for purely political reasons."
    Obama has highlighted his foreign policy record on the campaign trail, emphasizing how he presided over the killing of bin Laden, as well as how he ended the war in Iraq and set a timeline for winding down the war in Afghanistan.
    However, Obama has come under sharp attack from leading Republican lawmakers who have accused his administration of being behind high-level leaks of classified information. Leading Democrat lawmakers have also expressed shock at the level of leaking that has occurred, but they have not directed accusations at the Obama administration.
    Republican lawmakers have pointed to media reports about clandestine drone attacks, informants planted in al Qaeda affiliates and alleged cyber-warfare against Iran that Republicans say were calculated to promote Obama's image as a strong leader in an election year.
    The White House has denied leaking classified information.
    The president of Special Operations OPSEC Education Fund Inc., Scott Taylor, is a former Navy SEAL who in 2010 ran unsuccessfully for the Republican nomination for a congressional seat in Virginia. Calling itself "OPSEC" for short - which in spy jargon means "operational security" - the anti-leak group incorporated last June in Delaware, a state that has the most secretive corporate registration rules in the U.S.
    Several group representatives say their main motivation for setting up OPSEC was dismay at recent detailed media leaks about sensitive operations.
    In an interview, Taylor denied OPSEC had any political slant. He described the group as a "watchdog organization" but added that the current administration "has certainly leaked more than others."
    OPSEC spokesmen said the group has about $1 million at its disposal and hopes to raise more after the August 15th release of its mini-documentary, entitled "Dishonorable Disclosures," which aims, in spy-movie style, to document a recent spate of leaks regarding sensitive intelligence and military operations.
    Fred Rustmann, a former undercover case officer for the CIA who is a spokesman for the group, insisted its focus on leaks was "not a partisan concern." But he said the current administration had been leaking secrets "to help this guy get re-elected, at the expense of peoples' lives.... We want to see that they don't do this again."
    Chad Kolton, a former spokesman for the office of Director of National Intelligence during the George W. Bush administration who now represents OPSEC, also said the group's message and make-up are nonpolitical.
    "You'll see throughout the film that concern about protecting the lives of intelligence and Special Forces officers takes precedence over partisanship," he said.{1}
    Look, Mr. President, if a successful operation was conducted during your administration, you didn’t get there on your own. We citizens, military personnel, and intelligence communities are always struck by politicians who think that when a successful operation is conducted, well, it must be because they’re just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there in the military, and in intelligence agencies, who played a greater role in this operation than you did. We’re tired of politicians thinking that a successful operation was conducted based on one politician thinking that the operation’s success was based on the fact that that politician worked harder than everybody else. We want to tell you something, Mr. President, there were a whole bunch of hardworking people involved in this operation. (Applause.)
    If a successful operation was conducted during your administration, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a multitude of great military minds somewhere in your administration, and in the previous administration, that worked over the space of ten years to bring this operation to fruition. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American military operation that allowed you to thrive. Somebody risked their life to attain intelligence and information. If you’ve presided over a successful military operation, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. This successful operation didn’t get invented on its own. It didn’t even start during your administration. The military, the U.S. intelligence community, and even the previous administration created this operation, and they didn't do so for you to create a political talking point.
    The point is, is that when operations such as these succeed, they succeed because of number of individuals showing great initiative, but also because they did it together. There are some things, like the initial information gathering missions, the intensive multiplatform surveillance operations, identification of al-Qaeda couriers, receiving information in interrogations (some coercive) and corroborating them, using informants and other information gathering techniques to gain information on the compound, wire-tapping, conducting exercises and learning from operatives on the scene and correcting mistakes based on that information, and selecting the ideal military personnel to conduct such a military offensive{2}, and you don’t do that on our own Mr. President. I mean, imagine if this civilian president had attempted to take a hands on approach in this operation. (He can’t even throw a baseball like a fully equipped, adult male.) That would be a hard way to conduct a military operation.
    .
    So we say to ourselves, ever since the killing of Osama bin Laden, you know what, there are some things that other people do better. That’s how we conducted this operation. That’s how we killed Osama bin Laden. That’s how our fellow Americans got together to conduct this brilliant operation. That’s how we conduct all operations. The president, regardless of party, is a member of the civilian population, and we couldn’t do it without his rubber stamp approval, but the military, the members of the intelligence agencies, and the civilian population rise or fall together as one nation and as one people, and that’s the reason we’re speaking out against this President — because we still believe in America. You’re not on your own, Mr. President, we’re in this together. Give credit where credit is due, and quit putting the country in peril for the purpose of winning one election. We know that you’ll fundamentally disagree with this opinion, but in a country of 315 million people, that is over two hundred years old, no one man, or administration, is so important that we should be willing to put the country at peril to secure his or her re-election.

    The movie Dishonorable Disclosure sends message to Obama: You didn

  5. #5
    Senior Member nomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    NC and Canada. Got a foot in both worlds
    Posts
    3,773
    The Obama administration argues that the individuals in this film have no authority to speak on these issues:
    An Obama campaign official said: "No one in this group is in a position to speak with any authority on these issues and on what impact these leaks might have, and it's clear they've resorted to making things up for purely political reasons."
    Seriously? Seriously? These are men who are IN THE FIELD, these are men who actually carry out the mission, and Obozo's minions are going to stand there and say they aren't in a position to speak of these matters?
    Obozo couldn't care LESS about what happens to these men, just so long as HE can claim credit for it. As if he had anything to do with it other than okaying the mission. Remember: "You didn't build that" but I did create this...

    Somebody stick a pin in his ear and his head will explode!

  6. #6
    April
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by nomas View Post
    Seriously? Seriously? These are men who are IN THE FIELD, these are men who actually carry out the mission, and Obozo's minions are going to stand there and say they aren't in a position to speak of these matters?
    Obozo couldn't care LESS about what happens to these men, just so long as HE can claim credit for it. As if he had anything to do with it other than okaying the mission. Remember: "You didn't build that" but I did create this...

    Somebody stick a pin in his ear and his head will explode!
    He is an egotistical ignorant puppet nothing more. He puts his foot in his mouth every time he speaks without a telepromoter.

  7. #7
    Senior Member forest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,327
    Those soldiers all look like they want to vomit.... being near ovomit!
    As Aristotle said, “Tolerance and apathy are the first virtue of a dying civilization.â€

  8. #8
    April
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by forest View Post
    Those soldiers all look like they want to vomit.... being near ovomit!
    I agree....poor guys

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •