Thread: McAmnesty and his anger when someone asked a question

Have you guys heard mcamnesty's reaction to the simple fact that a reporter asked him a question that he considered running as John Kerry's running mate?

#1 It is UNBELIEVABLE that a 'republican' (not) would even consider running with one of the most liberal democrats.

#2 Would it not concern ANYONE that when he disagrees or becomes angry there is NO asking him questions. He appears to be even more stubborn than bush. The poor reporter was just trying to ask him a reasonable question and this is the response he gives?

#3 How this man got the republican nod is beyond me. It just makes NO sense. There is no one worth voting for at this point. Look at what all is going on with shillery and hussein . . . all their skeletons are now leaking out of the closet. I am going to do a write in.

#4 If we get mccain . . . it will be four more years of bush . . . just WORSE!!!!

Your correct, as a long time conservative and Vietnam vet I cannot support McCain, he has the temperament of a 10 year old, spoiled one at that. I will do a write in and let the chips fall where they may.

Red Button McCain. More of a terror than the terrorist.
The CFR put him there.

Originally Posted by oldguy

Your correct, as a long time conservative and Vietnam vet I cannot support McCain, he has the temperament of a 10 year old, spoiled one at that. I will do a write in and let the chips fall where they may.

I say push his buttons till he emplodes!!! He would be easy to toy with. I wish I was a reporter on the plane as I have that knack! LOL

John McCain does not have the temperament to me a supervisor at Wal-Mart, let alone the POTUS. The Republican Party has gone insane if they expect anyone to support this clown.

Originally Posted by alisab

Have you guys heard mcamnesty's reaction to the simple fact that a reporter asked him a question that he considered running as John Kerry's running mate?

#1 It is UNBELIEVABLE that a 'republican' (not) would even consider running with one of the most liberal democrats.

#2 Would it not concern ANYONE that when he disagrees or becomes angry there is NO asking him questions. He appears to be even more stubborn than bush. The poor reporter was just trying to ask him a reasonable question and this is the response he gives?

#3 How this man got the republican nod is beyond me. It just makes NO sense. There is no one worth voting for at this point. Look at what all is going on with shillery and hussein . . . all their skeletons are now leaking out of the closet. I am going to do a write in.

#4 If we get mccain . . . it will be four more years of bush . . . just WORSE!!!!

In a way what the CFR has presented us with all points to Hillary being potus . Then everybody BUT patriots are happy . Specially the Elites pushing the buttons . NO one has or will vote for McAmnesty . Cross over votes to Hillary . The gop sold us out as bad as Dubya ever has . It just keeps getting worst in this country (i can't say Our country cause it's not) anymore

I'm not defending McCain not answering the question BUT I think McCain has a hostility towards the NY Times and we may see a lot of this kind of response from him if the reporters from the Times continue to poke at him like this.

My opinion is the Times has an agenda and that is to do anything to smear WHATEVER REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IS HEADED TO THE NOMINATION. McCain, moreso, than most of the others because the Dems know since he is a "Liberal Republican" (and my personal opinion is that he should have run as an Independent Candidate and left the Republicans to nominate a true Republican but couldn't do so because of the $$$$ factor) and is a threat to the Democrat base because there are those who will cross over depending on who gets the Dem nomination.

The Times will continue to promote their "liberal bias" to anyone who doesn't fit in their agenda.

Originally Posted by safari

I'm not defending McCain not answering the question BUT I think McCain has a hostility towards the NY Times and we may see a lot of this kind of response from him if the reporters from the Times continue to poke at him like this.

My opinion is the Times has an agenda and that is to do anything to smear WHATEVER REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IS HEADED TO THE NOMINATION. McCain, moreso, than most of the others because the Dems know since he is a "Liberal Republican" (and my personal opinion is that he should have run as an Independent Candidate and left the Republicans to nominate a true Republican but couldn't do so because of the $$$$ factor) and is a threat to the Democrat base because there are those who will cross over depending on who gets the Dem nomination.

The Times will continue to promote their "liberal bias" to anyone who doesn't fit in their agenda.

What I find so amazing is that he was the best thing ever for the New York Times and they backed him UNTIL he actually got the nod. Now the wacky liberals from the NYT will tear him down piece by piece. It is amazing what liberal media has done. They pushed for mccain so that we would not have a reasonable republican candidate and they would be able to push their democratic agenda. And now here we are with the WORST actual candidate with no chance of saving our party and they have the two best liberal wackos they can have and probably the presidential bid.

My opinion is the Times has an agenda and that is to do anything to smear WHATEVER REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IS HEADED TO THE NOMINATION.

McCain deserves it! Since he is the GOP candidate, in name only, who cares if they smear him and take him down. It's not important which party gets the presidency, it's what they do in the presidency! Look what the Republican Bush has done. McJerk will give amnesty to all 30 million illegals. Smear forward NYT.

Just so you know, I am not supporting McCain and I will throw my vote away to a person more "in tune with my value" so neither the Repubs or Dems will get my vote at this juncture.