Thread: If Unopposed,Choose Your Anti-bailout Write-In Candidate Now

If your bail-out traitor is unopposed, it would be a shame to have no better option but to scribble devil horns and swears over his name on the ballot, so make sure your community agrees on who'll be the write-in candidate, so the votes are all pooled in one place. HERE'S HOW, AND THE HISTORY OF IT. Doing a write-in is simple, and people have actually won. A $1 trillion bailout of Chinese and British investment companies hasn't happened often. The hard-earned money of middle-class taxpayers has been a pig trough for corporations for a long time, going back to the Saving and Loan bailout of the Eighties and the famous $600 toilet seats ordered for the Pentagon (anyone remember those?), but how big, corrupt, and treasonous for America this bailout is brings it to a new level.

A big write-in vote, even if it doesn't manage to win, serves a very valuable purpose. It is the the equivalent of a vote of "no confidence" and it sets up the incumbent for a strong primary challenge which can begin organizing immediately. In election terms, two years is not that long, and all exploratory work should be completed by next summer, barely six months from now, so fundraising can begin.

In the meantime we have a president to impeach, a Speaker of the House to hold complicit in war crimes, and a country to get back. Now, who's going to be the write in? START GETTING THAT NAME OUT NOW!

(If they are opposed, naturally you are just going to hold your nose and vote for the Democrat and get rid of him later. He/she'll know they are just being used to send a message.)

Why don't we just vote out the incumbent this time - if they have a challenger.

Just a thought, but I believe to just say vote out, vote for their opponent, anyone who is an incumbent - this time - would be more likely to get done than to try to get together and choose a write in.

To get everyone to get together and all choose a write in this late in the game, almost seems impossible.

So, just voting out the incumbent would be simpler and would send the same message.

Maybe???????????????

Still voting for RON PAUL for prez. He seems to be one of the only ones that does not have to spin anything. He points out the problems and offers solutions.

Vortex, can he accept even if he bowed out? Does a write-in even get mentioned anymore?

I do remember, I am not sure when, I think I must have been a teen, but local news reports showed all names of those in the race, even a write-in. It seemed so common place, at least here, to hear about them, and how many voted. Now all you hear about are the Demorats and the Anti-Republicans!!

Originally Posted by nntrixie

Why don't we just vote out the incumbent this time - if they have a challenger.

Just a thought, but I believe to just say vote out, vote for their opponent, anyone who is an incumbent - this time - would be more likely to get done than to try to get together and choose a write in.

To get everyone to get together and all choose a write in this late in the game, almost seems impossible.

So, just voting out the incumbent would be simpler and would send the same message.

Maybe???????????????

Yes I should have made that clear, the write-in is a tool for incumbents who are unopposed, of course if he is opposed just vote for the other guy, even if he is a Democrat, to get the incumbent out. The Dem will know he's not in there because people love him but because was used to send a message. Take care of him next time around. I'll change the title line.

ralph

You're right.

You know if we get in the habit of doing this, we can always fix any mistake next time around.