Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
12-28-2007, 12:01 PM #1
WILL U.N. HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ALL PRIVATE PROPERTY?
[b]
WILL U.N. HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ALL PRIVATE PROPERTY?
Derry Brownfield
December 28, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
H.R. 2421, “Clean Water Restoration Act of 2007â€
-
12-28-2007, 12:18 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- South Western Ohio
- Posts
- 5,278
There really isn’t a lot of information available to the public to comment on this bill but as a farmer with a lake and two ponds and a creek and a natural spring run
I am total against this one… If they want to play with the rivers and oceans and protect them that’s one ting... But until the release some specifics on just what the who’s ,the what’s, the when’s, the where’s, and the whys, I’m total against it.
-
12-28-2007, 01:54 PM #3
[quote]If ratified, the United States would be subject to a United Nations Court mandating maritime issues involving fisheries, marine environmental protection, preservation, research and navigation. We would be submitting our jurisdiction to the International Criminal Court. The treaty requires adherence to policies that regulate deep-sea mining, and forces participants to adopt laws and regulations to control marine pollution. Under the treaty a corporation cannot bring suit, but must rely upon its country of origin to address the corporation’s concerns “before the UN agency.â€
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
12-28-2007, 02:02 PM #4
[quote="zeezil"][quote]If ratified, the United States would be subject to a United Nations Court mandating maritime issues involving fisheries, marine environmental protection, preservation, research and navigation. We would be submitting our jurisdiction to the International Criminal Court. The treaty requires adherence to policies that regulate deep-sea mining, and forces participants to adopt laws and regulations to control marine pollution. Under the treaty a corporation cannot bring suit, but must rely upon its country of origin to address the corporation’s concerns “before the UN agency.â€
-
12-28-2007, 02:27 PM #5
I have several times but will again when they are back in session....this is important!
Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)
-
12-28-2007, 02:31 PM #6
The UN jackasses already run our national parks, what else do they want? They won't be happy until they bring down the sovereignty of the greatest nation on earth.
Do we really have to notify our Senators about this one..you mean to tell me they don't have the common sense to figure this one out and vote against it? Geez, what kind of country are we running here?Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
12-28-2007, 02:41 PM #7Originally Posted by RockfishThe UN jackasses already run our national parks, what else do they want?Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)
-
12-28-2007, 05:55 PM #8Originally Posted by SOSADFORUS
BRUTAL! Bill Melugin Throws Down Against Jim Jordan and GOP...
05-10-2024, 04:20 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports