The irrefutable fact is, the American People have never debated granting a power to Congress to regulate their healthcare needs and choices as described in Obamacare, and then approved the delegation of said power via our Constitution’s Article V provision which requires approval by “the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof “ prior to the exercised of any new power by Congress.

It is self evident that any member of Congress, as well as any federal judge or Justice, who acts to enforce Obamacare and pretends to the public that Obamacare is within the powers granted to Congress, and particularly works to enforce that part of Obamacare under which federal force would be used to enter the states to compel the people therein to purchased health insurance, would be guilty, at the very least, of malfeasance, misfeasance and/or nonfeasance.

In fact, the enforcement of Obamacare by any federal official would be an overt act of tyranny, whether it is supported by members of Congress or given approval by our Supreme Court because 21 States have officially expressed their disapproval of Obamacare, and therefore, Article V’s requirement, consent of the governed, has been explicitly stated in the negative! In addition, by every poll taken, the overwhelming majority of Americans reject Obamacare as written.

The simple truth is, those who point to this or that part of our Constitution and suggest they have identified the provision under which the people have given their consent and delegated the power in question to Congress, offer their opinion without a shred of evidence to support their claim from the historical debates during which time the contended provision was debated and became part of our Constitution.


Bottom line is, those who contend a provision exists in our Constitution under which the American People have knowingly and willingly given their consent to allow Congress to enter the various united States and assume control over their health care needs and choices are delinquent in producing a shred of documentation from the historical record establishing the [b][i]“legislative intentâ€