Thread: The funding of Illegals , the Farm Bill and the Church

This is a single example of a networking web that exists in illegal immigration. This is evident on a grand scale as global corps use human rights organizations to further their cause. It is also an example in how these organizations find wealthy contributers. In particular it focuses on SHARE in Central America to a major American Financial Company and a communications employee, to the Catholic Church and to American agro lobby. This again is a minor and breif summary, but it is important to note how netowrking comes into play in these types of triangles. Add to the mix State representatives, Congressmen and Senators, the President, racist hispanic Organizations and Communist Groups, the MSM and print Media and you have the makings of what is going on now. Anyone interested in fighting illegal immigration should seek out the connections in a similar manner for the different Brown Supremacist organizations.

SHARE is a major communist organization and actually funds the exchange of bishops and clergy from Central and South American countries. Again, it is this process of "exchange" that creates networking opportunities that turn into full fledge illegal operations.

These types of organizations are generally fronts and do nothing more than get networking established. For example, SHARE is tied heavily to a Financial Firm called Laird Norton Tyee here in Seattle.

http://www.lntyee.com/

Their primary concern has always been catering to the ultra wealthy and it is here that you will find Direct Involvement with Erin Moyer, Sr. Communications Consultant at Laird Norton Tyee. She is also Sister-In-Law to SHARE board member Francisco Lopez. Erin is very important to note because she spent a great deal of time as Assistant Vice President, Corporate Communication at Washington Mutual. Now she has been using her position of power and influence to set up networking for organizations like SHARE and other related entities. Organizations like SHARE appear to be human rights based, but in reality they end up functioning as fronts for the advancement of collectivism.

Many socialist organizations hide under the guise of human rights and justice and morality and basically anything that is, at least on the surface incontestable. SHARE takes great efforts, guided by Erin Moyer to maintain this facade, and as is often the case, the true intentions of the organization find their way out and into the public eye. SHARE first became noted for its attack on the School of the Americas by using human rights as a front.

Scroll down to the last 3 paragraphs and you get the idea:
http://www.share-elsalvador.org/reflections/index.htm

When you have a powerful person like Erin Moyer as family, who controls communications and press releases for one of the largest (and quietest) financial companies on the planet, sets meetings with journalist friends and powerful clients, you have the key to keeping your organization afloat. Erin Moyer points many wealthy seeking "charitable" organizations for philanthropic purposes to entities like SHARE. Which given her well formed communications and spin seem like a decent organization. Unfortunately many wealthy do not know more than what they are presented about the organizations they fund, only that they are guranteed a write off. This isn't to say that some aren't conscious of it...

So how does organizations like SHARE affect the US?

http://www.share-elsalvador.org/news/051607.htm

Lobbying. In the above example it deals with the Farm Bill. Notice the quote from the first paragraph:

With the current US Farm Bill set to expire this summer, agribusiness, food retailers, family farmers, faith-based groups and many others are embroiled in congressional lobbying activities to promote a new bill in keeping with their priorities.

As quoted very Conservatively in their own reference:
El Salvador sends a steady flow of migrants to the US daily: estimates put the figures at 185,000 people/year, or about 500 people/day.

One can investigate their organization more. SHARE is but one of many. Now this is where we can find the root of Catholic Economic Involvement, by observing the National Catholic Rural Life Conference:

http://www.ncrlc.com/index.html
They have the interests of the Vatican and illegal aliens as indicated here:
http://www.ncrlc.com/labor_day_reflection.html

They utilize a global corp propaganda clearing house:
The ago-observatory
http://www.agobservatory.org/

Again at first glance you see massive amounts of neutral information. There is obvious evidence of this organizations agenda as well as the agenda of the Catholic church and labor groups, they are using the Farm Bill as an amnesty stepping stone and a way to pave the path for justified illegal immigration in the future. the complicated manner of this network is astounding, but so is the physiology of any disease.

Here is the illegal alien tie-in:

http://www.agobservatory.org/library.cfm?refid=99390

Consider this quote (arrogant in its mention of solidarity):

A number of groups are working to shed light on the difficult situations that U.S. migrant workers face. A few are included here. Immigrant rights groups such as Sin Fronteras have launched the Border Agricultural Workers Project to show how Mexican laborers who make it across the border are the victims of poor wages, poor health care and housing.12 The United Farm Workers of America is organizing farm workers
to win safe work conditions and fair wages through union contracts, and is spearheading efforts to for a compromise immigration reform bill (AgJobs), which is currently before Congress.13 The Farm Labor Organizing Committee of the AFL-CIO is working to ensure that migrant workers’ voices are heard and their human rights are secured.14 The Rural Coalition is coordinating the Farm and Food Policy Diversity Initiative which represents people of color farmers, ranchers, farm workers and urban food system advocates in the U.S. who seek to ensure that those who are marginalized by U.S. farm policy can benefit from reform.15

In the article the constantly mention that NAFTA caused an increase in immigration adn propose as a solution the passing of the Farm Bill to benefit the Mexican marketplace. They mention:

...Reform U.S. Commodity Programs: Farm programs used to include a price floor and other tools to ensure a fair market price. Reinstating and updating these tools to ensure a fair market price in the U.S. would greatly reduce export dumping into other countries, including Mexico.
✴ Add a Competition Title: Agribusiness firms have been the big winners from the current farm bill/free trade model. These companies have used their unregulated market power to exploit farmers and agricultural workers. A Competition Title in the 2007 Farm Bill would improve antitrust enforcement and increase competition in the marketplace....

LOL is important to put here, but no reader should be laughing. This is like saying that the best way to fight crime is to address the root cause of it and give crack dealers cell phones.

Again the agenda under the surface is indicated here:
http://www.agobservatory.org/library.cfm?RefID=48588
It is a document Called Blood Sweat and Fear, the Human rights of...
Yes, I know. But again it is important to note how they mask the cause in Human Rights.

BTW this IS the new amnesty agenda.

Marxism Masquerades as the Church in Latin America

Refuting the New Sanctuary Movement (Elvira)

The Farm bill is the new amnesty. It is very important to understand that the new spin/uncontestable issue that will be presented here is hunger. It is slightly different than the regular amnesty bill that was attempted. The famr bill has in its bowels the desire to make illegals labor union members and pay them full wages (the same as Americans receive-well acutally better) and full union health benefits. Amnesty has been tied to this bill in a very subtle way. The strategic spin on this bill is to target rural folk and to create a division between rural individuals and corporate farms, without mentioning the agjobs portion of the bill. In other words, it is to get fmailies and small farms to vote for it, so they think they are protecting their business, when on the backside of the bill is amnesty.

Please check out these links for familiarization if you don't no about this already (there are many many others):
http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbc ... SHbusiness

http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2007/jul ... ration_re/

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/sen ... 07-25.html

Farm Labor Visa:
http://tracypress.com/content/view/10630/2244/

The belief on the amnesty side of the street is that they need to push the crisis button to get amnesty. Corps will wither, that sort of thing. We should pay very close attention to the farm bill and its resurrections.

Radical farmworkers have been pushing the US around since their landmark lawsuit against the University of California at Davis in the 1970's. (Brought by California Rural Legal Assistance) This was a milestone in shutting down the advancement of automation into crop harvesting and, when combined with Pres. Carter's Ag. Secretary's, Bob Bergland, decision to gut any federal research, ensured that farmworkers would have their own protected place in the US economy.

Farmwork has been the path for these people have used to move into other places in the US economy, since farmwork isn't going to keep them busy year round. And in the financially strapped hinterlands of America their cut rate services have been welcomed. This is kind of like having the drawbridge across the moat to your castle always down.

See this article for references :
http://www.mindfully.org/Farm/2004/Chea ... 2mar04.htm

Since then farmworkers have had a number of lawsuits because of health or safety issues or other reasons. It seems that they already have gained more than their share of rights, but new law grads are hatched every year eager to help them.

Originally Posted by Captainron

Radical farmworkers have been pushing the US around since their landmark lawsuit against the University of California at Davis in the 1970's. (Brought by California Rural Legal Assistance) This was a milestone in shutting down the advancement of automation into crop harvesting and, when combined with Pres. Carter's Ag. Secretary's, Bob Bergland, decision to gut any federal research, ensured that farmworkers would have their own protected place in the US economy.

Farmwork has been the path for these people have used to move into other places in the US economy, since farmwork isn't going to keep them busy year round. And in the financially strapped hinterlands of America their cut rate services have been welcomed. This is kind of like having the drawbridge across the moat to your castle always down.

See this article for references :
http://www.mindfully.org/Farm/2004/Chea ... 2mar04.htm

Since then farmworkers have had a number of lawsuits because of health or safety issues or other reasons. It seems that they already have gained more than their share of rights, but new law grads are hatched every year eager to help them.

Great article.

If you pick up the paper in any rural area you will find a great deal of farmers in bankruptcy. This isn't of course becasue they are just good old boys who have been "took," but more because they REALLY needed that $395,000 John Deer with AC and CD changer, the five new trucks, swimming pool and house additions.

If you so choose, you can submit your comments to Barbara Boxer about the Farm Bill:

http://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/f ... edback.cfm

Originally Posted by Populist

If you so choose, you can submit your comments to Barbara Boxer about the Farm Bill:

http://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/f ... edback.cfm

I think we need to find some material to send them that they will actually read and digest. How many thousands of correspondences do you suppose a California Senator gets each month? I would like to know what technique actually has the best chance of being taken into consideration. Early in the summer some of us actually went and "lobbied" in a US Senator's office. We got to talk to an aide--who was rather on the chilly side. This was one of the major offices---but, my gosh, they have several.

Secondly it is very important to know what you are talking about. We expect our elected representatives to listen to no one but the experts in their fields; we wouldn't want them listening to any yahoo off the street. So, it is important to have indisputable data to bolster your views, obtained from recognized and reliable sources. I might suggest sources like : FBI, DOJ, US attorneys, States' Attorneys General, Law Enforcement Associations, recognized higher education institutions, or other government agencies or recognized foundations. Research groups can be slanted and personal anecdotes have little factual value but might produce some emotional sympathy.

I don't really think they are going to get the message until they start to lose seats. They don't believe they will lose seats.