Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,087

    Kay Bailey Hutchinson Immigration Reply to Constituents

    Thank you for contacting me regarding comprehensive immigration reform. I welcome your thoughts and comments on this issue.

    Texas is a state that uniquely benefits from the contributions of legal immigrants, but it is also uniquely vulnerable to the dangers of illegal immigration. Since I was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 1993, my principles have been clear and consistent: we must secure our borders while discouraging illegal behavior. As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I have worked to appropriate funds for border security, which includes new Border Patrol agents, Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigators, detention officers, and detention beds. We have ended catch and release and accelerated the deportation process. I strongly supported provisions for an additional $1.9 billion in immediate funding for border security to cover the first 1,000 of 6,000 new Border Patrol agents hired this year and in 2008. These funds, as provided in the fiscal year 2006 Emergency Supplemental appropriations bill, will assist with the temporary deployment of up to 6,000 National Guard troops aiding the Border Patrol with surveillance and logistics. Yet, more needs to be done to secure our borders, and I continue to seek additional emergency spending to immediately address this national security issue.

    On May 9, 2007, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada introduced
    S. 1348, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007. Initially, the bill consisted of the same language from S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006, which the Senate considered last year. On May 19, 2007, Senators Harry Reid and Ted Kennedy (D-MA) introduced a substitute amendment, S. AMDT. 1150, to the bill. The amendment replaced the original text of the bill with new language to be considered. The new language was negotiated over several months between the Bush Administration and a small group of senators.

    The legislation addressed several key issues of comprehensive immigration reform. First, the bill concentrated on border enforcement by mandating the hiring, training, and deployment of 20,000 border patrol and immigration enforcement agents; the construction of 370 miles of border fencing; the completion of 300 miles of vehicle barriers; and, the deployment of 4 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. The bill also would have provided for 105 operational ground-based radar and camera towers on the southern border and authorized that 31,500 detention beds must be available so that apprehended aliens can be detained. All other provisions of the bill were contingent upon these security provisions first being met.

    Second, the bill sought to strengthen workforce enforcement through the use of an electronic employment verification system (EEVS). When the EEVS was in place, the Administration predicted that within 18 months, illegal aliens would find it extremely difficult to gain any legitimate employment. Under the bill, illegal workers would not only have been subject to removal from the country but would have been permanently barred from any U.S. immigration program, and employers who knowingly hired illegal workers would have faced stiff penalties.

    The bill aimed to overhaul the current U.S. immigration system by enacting a merit-based immigration system or “point system.â€

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    mexico by the mountains
    Posts
    487
    Good explanation. There are some good things in the bill. I would like to see a labor analysis before any kind of visa is offered.
    AMERICAN WORKERS FIRST -- A RAID A DAY KEEPS THE ILLEGALS AWAY

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Farmers Branch, Texas
    Posts
    385
    I got this same email this morning! And a letter from her in the mail a couple of weeks ago!

    Too bad Coryn hasn't sent me one lately (he has in the past).

    TexasGal

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,377
    This is different from what she used to say when I got letters from her.

    BAck then it was 'must find a way for them to participate legally' , blah, blah, blah.

    Why can't any of them just say we need to enforce the laws we now have on the books.

    We need to get our country cleaned out, cleaned up, back to work, then we can worry about future immigration.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •