Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    Lead Obama not into temptation

    Lead Obama not into temptation

    Chuck Norris

    Posted: July 31, 2011
    3:50 pm Eastern


    Last Monday, as President Obama spoke to the National Council of La Raza, he told his listeners something that should alarm every American. He confessed that he'd like to "bypass Congress and change the laws on my own." He added, "Believe me, the idea of doing things on my own is very tempting. I promise you."

    He doesn't need to promise us. We believe him, because we've been watching his rogue behavior since the moment he entered office.

    Way back in February 2010, even the New York Times unveiled his modus operandi in its report, "Obama making plans to use executive power." It summarized, "With much of his legislative agenda stalled in Congress, President Obama and his team are preparing an array of actions using his executive power to advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities."

    Obama's unauthorized war in Libya was just one more wayward decision in a long line of executive-power-run-amok choices, taken despite that top Pentagon and Department of Justice lawyers considered his unilateral Libyan invasion as illegal "hostilities." And according to congressional testimony, his own team of lawyers in the Office of Legal Counsel was asked to soft-peddle their views so as to curb any further violation allegations.

    What alarms me is not only that these perversions of power are coming from the highest office in the land but also from Obama's advisers and team (including his lawyers). In his speech to the National Council of La Raza, the president also explained that he was taking his cues from others: "I know some people want me to bypass Congress and change the laws on my own."

    Of course, Obama knows that to do so at the outset of the debt debates would have assured his political downfall. On the other hand, swooping down on Capitol Hill from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in the last hour (say, just short of Aug. 2!) to save the economy from hopeless partisan gridlock would surely put him on the front page of Savior Daily!

    Speaking of the press, what's equally tragic is that the Obama-mania media is even jumping on the executive-power runaway express. Just this past Thursday, CNN ran an article by Jack Balkin, Knight professor of constitutional law at Yale Law School, titled, "3 ways Obama could bypass Congress." (Do you think CNN would have extended the same clemency from Congress to someone like G.W. Bush?)

    As the New York Times reported at the beginning of last year, Obama's exploits to bypass Congress are intended to "advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities." We can now add America's border problems to those, as Obama also elaborated last week to the National Council of La Raza that the temptation to bypass Congress includes "not just immigration reform."

    No wonder the crowd began to chant, "Yes, we can!" (Tragically, it seems that too many citizens want a Führer more than a president.)

    Do we really want a power-hungry rogue president who is continually tempted to bypass Congress? Will we continue to allow unilateral power to our president to follow his own political whims and desires? Do we want a supreme leader who constantly seeks ways to justify dodging our bicameral legislative branch – the very checks-and-balances of our republic? When he avoids Congress, is he not also trampling on the Constitution and its mandates for separation of powers and teamwork among our three branches of government?

    Has the president forgotten his oath of office? "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

    Mr. President, I strongly suggest you meditate upon the legal genius of Joseph Story, justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1811 to 1845 (and appointed by President James Madison). Justice Story explained, "[T]he duty imposed upon [the president] to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, follows out the strong injunctions of his oath of office that he will 'preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution.' The great object of the executive department is to accomplish this purpose."

    Wow, how Justice Story's words fly in the face of President Obama's thoughts last week: "bypass Congress and change the laws on my own."

    No wonder Thomas Jefferson passionately proclaimed: "I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our Constitution ... taking from the federal government their power of borrowing."

    God, lead Obama not into "doing things on my own" temptation.

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=328473
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,808
    Why do I keep having the feeling that when Obama loses the election in 2012, he will have to be removed from office physically.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •