Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
05-26-2006, 10:37 AM #1
December 7, September 11 and May 25
JOHN W LILLPOP
December 7 and September 11. Two tragic days in American history marred by attacks on our beloved homeland by cowardly foreign enemies.
May 25 now joins those dates in infamy, after the US Senate visited unimaginable horror upon We the People in the name of immigration reform.
Bombs were not dropped on Americans as was the case on December 7. Planes were not used as weapons of mass destruction against commercial landmarks and the Pentagon as on 9/11.
Nonetheless, the devastation inflicted by the US Senate upon the We the People was whithering.
In a spiritual sense, May 25 may actually represent a greater disaster for We the People than either Pearl Harbor or 9/11.
After all, each of the 100 men and women serving in the Senate took an oath to protect and defend America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
In other words, they are supposed to be on OUR side... we count on them to protect our interests.
But by a vote of 62-36, the US Senate said to hell with homeland security and American sovereignty. To hell with American language, borders and culture.
Most tragically, to hell with the rule of law and to hell with We the People.
Overall, 63% of the Senate voted to sell-out America in favor of Mexico.
Only Judas has staged a more blatantly evil betrayal.
Of the 42 Democrats who voted, 38 voted with Mexico, four with America.
In other words, 90% of Democrat senators are unconcerned about US homeland security, and could care less if America decays into a third-world sewer like Mexico.
The Democrats' reward? 20 million new Democrats and the intoxicating lure of long-term political power.
On the Republican side of the aisle, of the 56 who voted, 24 sided with Mexico while 32 said OK To America.
In other words, 43% of GOP senators are more concerned with providing cheap labor for big business than with upholding the rule of law and protecting the homeland.
True, 57% of the GOP voted for America. But Republicans are expected to defend American interests against the ravages of liberalism and socialism.
Thus, 57% is abysmal.
To add bitter poison to the mix, a GOP senator reportedly made a last minute change which requires the US to consult with Mexico before erecting a border fence.
Consult with Mexico about securing US borders? Can you imagine?
That's like conferring with Osama bin Laden prior to implementing airport security.
Or consulting with Iran's goofy Ahmadinejad about US strategy for preventing the madman from blowing Israel into smithereens.
Still, despite the gut-wrenching let down, patriotic Americans can be grateful for the fact that the US House of Representatives must also act on any immigration legislation before it can be signed into law.
Thank God, the House is comprised of decent conservatives more commited to American security, sovereignty and culture than cheap labor.
jwl
-
05-26-2006, 10:49 AM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- ALABAMA
- Posts
- 55
1/3 of the Senate is up for re-election
1/3 of Senate voted against this bill
100% of the House is up for re-election
Nearly all of the house voted for the enforcement bill
Can you connct the dots?Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!
-
05-26-2006, 07:15 PM #3Originally Posted by timnem
Four Democrats voted against this monster---three are up fpr reelection.
-
05-26-2006, 07:32 PM #4
The fact that all the Representatives are up for election this year is intriguing. Could it be that the House voted for tough enforcement because they are pandering to us? Once re-elected, could they then feel "safe" for another 2 years and then show their true intentions?
I think there are some truly courageous Representatives who want to preserve our republic. However, just as in the Senate, I am sure there are some Representatives who will change their opinions on this issue once they feel confident they will be re-elected.
What I'm saying is this: don't relent. Even if the senate version of "comprehensive immigration reform" is rejected by the House, keep an eye on them after November. WE MUST NOT BE FOOLED AGAIN.
-
05-27-2006, 02:59 AM #5
What I'm saying is this: don't relent. Even if the senate version of "comprehensive immigration reform" is rejected by the House, keep an eye on them after November. WE MUST NOT BE FOOLED AGAIN.
Excellent point. I think we are all learning the sleaze-ability of politicians
-
05-27-2006, 03:12 AM #6
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
Originally Posted by GodHelpUs
NOTE: doesn't matter if they voted for the enforcement bill.......what's important is if they're taking deals and getting arms bent by rove and gang. What counts is how they vote for the REAL VOTE.....not the house bill which didn't mean anything in the scheme of things.
WAKE UP MY BEAUTIFUL AMERICAJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
JOE BIDEN WANTS TO BRING IN GAZA RESIDENTS AND GIVE THEM...
05-02-2024, 01:19 PM in Videos about Illegal Immigration, refugee programs, globalism, & socialism