The Elites Meet at the World Economic Forum to Plot the Destruction of Liberty and P

[kathyet2]

Thursday, January 23, 2014
An Emerging Global Industrial Feudalism - The Elites Meet at the World Economic Forum to Plot the Destruction of Liberty and Prosperity


The World Economic Forum (WEF) kicks off every year in Davos, Switzerland in January. It's where the elites of global tyranny meet to plot and implement the takeover of the world by destroying peace, liberty, property rights and prosperity while imposing a corporate industrial feudalism and militarized police states upon everyone on the planet. The WEF is no ordinary meeting. In fact, it's very well organized. It's got extremely powerful players, unlimited money, an agenda and extensive plans. Furthermore, much of the WEF's goals have already been accomplished including NSA styled global surveillance, endless wars for resources and corporate monopoly, the destruction of the world's currencies by central banks, the bail-in or theft of financial assets to bailout banksters and the total annihilation of the middle class everywhere.

From it's own website, the World Economic Forum pretty much lays out in plain and simple language its purpose, players and goals. For the uninitiated, progressives, communitarians, collectivists and Marxists, it reads like a fairy tale of an awesome plan for humanity. For those anchored in reality, facts and history, it's a blueprint to abolish peace, liberty and prosperity on a global scale. The website is worth cruising because it's packed with relevant information on its players, partners and councils.

Global Agenda Councils

The Network of Global Agenda Councils is a unique, global community of over 1,500 premier thought leaders who are the foremost experts in their fields of academia, business, government, international organizations and society. Grouped in over 80 Councils, Global Agenda Council Members commit their extensive knowledge, expertise and passion to jointly shape the global, regional and industry agenda. The Global Agenda Councils are committed to addressing the most pressing issues and opportunities of our time and aim to provide new thinking and solutions.

Below are the Global Agenda Councils and it's clearly evident that these central planning councils cover every possible aspect of human endeavor and existence.

Advanced Manufacturing,Ageing, Anti-Corruption & Transparency, Arctic, Biodiversity & Natural Capital, Biotechnology, Catastrophic Risks, Climate Change, Competitiveness, Complex Systems, Conflict Prevention, Data-Driven Development, Design & Innovation, Digital Health, Education & Skills, Emerging Multinationals Emerging Technologies, Employment, Energy Security, Financing & Capital, Fiscal Sustainability, Food & Nutrition,Security, Fostering Entrepreneurship, Fragile States and Conflict Prevention, Future of Government, Future of Media, Future of Universities, Future of the Internet, Geopolitical Risk, Global Financial System, Global Trade & FDI, Governance for Sustainability, Human Rights, Illicit Trade, Illicit Trade & Organized Crime, Informed Societies, Infrastructure, Institutional Governance, System,s Intellectual Property System, International Monetary System, Logistics & Supply Chain Systems, Long-Term Investing, Measuring Sustainability, Migration, Neuroscience & Behaviour, New Economic Thinking, New Energy Architecture, New Growth Models, New Models of Leadership, New Models of Travel & Tourism, Nuclear, Biological & Chemical Weapons, Oceans, Organized Crime, Personal Transportation Systems, Personalized & Precision Medicine, Population Growth, Poverty & Sustainable Development, Responsible Mineral Resources Management, Robotics & Smart Devices, Role of Business, Role of Civil Society, Role of Faith, Role of the Arts in Society, Rule of Law, Social Innovation, Social Media, Social Security Systems, Space Security, Sustainable Consumption, Terrorism, Urbanization, Values, Water Security, Well-being & Mental Health,Women's Empowerment, Youth Unemployment


Strategic Partners

"Strategic Partners make a tangible impact on global issues and society by contributing to better policy-making, informing business decisions, sharing best practices and engaging stakeholders beyond commercial objectives."

ABB
The Abraaj Group
Accenture
Adecco Group
Aetna
Agility
Alcoa
ArcelorMittal
AUDI AG
Bahrain Economic Development Board
Bain & Company
Bank of America
Barclays
Basic Element
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation**
Bombardier
Booz & Company
The Boston Consulting Group
BP Plc
Bridgewater Associates
BT
Burda Media
CA Technologies
Chevron
Cisco
Citi
Clayton, Dubilier, Rice LLC
The Coca-Cola Company
Credit Suisse
Dalian Wanda Group
Deloitte
Deutsche Bank
Deutsche Post DHL
Dogus Group
The Dow Chemical Company
DuPont
Eskom Holdings SOC Limited
EY
Fluor Corporation
GE
Goldman Sachs
Google Inc.
Hanwha Group
HCL Technologies Ltd
Heidrick & Struggles
Henkel
HSBC
Huawei Technologies
IHS
Infosys
Itaú Unibanco
Jones Lang LaSalle =
JPMorgan Chase Co.
KPMG International
Kudelski Group
Lazard
Leighton Holdings Ltd
Lenovo
LIXIL Group
LUKOIL
ManpowerGroup
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC)
McKinsey & Company
Microsoft Corporation
Mitsubishi Corporation
Morgan Stanley
National Bank of Kuwait
Nestlé SA
Novartis
NYSE
The Olayan Group
Old Mutual
Omnicom Group
PepsiCo
Petrobras
Petroleo Brasileiro SA - Petrobras
Prudential
Publicis Groupe
PwC
Qualcomm
Reliance Industries
Renault-Nissan Alliance
The Rockefeller Foundation**
Royal Philips
SABMiller
salesforce.com *
Saudi Aramco
Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC)
Sberbank
Siemens
SK Group
SOCAR (State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic)
Standard Chartered
Swiss International Air Lines
Swiss Re
System Capital Management
Takeda Pharmaceutical
Tata Consultancy Services
Tech Mahindra
Thomson Reuters
Toshiba Corporation
Total
UBS
Unilever
USM Holdings
VimpelCom
Visa Inc.
Volkswagen AG
VTB Bank
Wipro
WPP
Yahoo
Zurich Insurance Group

The biggest multinational corporations are strategic partners.

Foundation Members

The World Economic Forum’s 1,000 Foundation Member companies are at the heart of all the Forum’s activities and their support is essential in helping find truly sustainable and global solutions to improve the state of the world. The typical Member company is a global enterprise ranking among the top companies within their industry and/or country.

Global Leadership Fellows

As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, the once well-defined line between the public and private sectors continues to blur, making it difficult for any one organization to act effectively in isolation. To succeed in such a fast-changing environment, institutions – both private and public – must bring together numerous stakeholders to approach problems more efficiently, develop strategies and capitalize on opportunities.

The NWO is based on the marriage of big business and big government under a global governance leadership. The Public Private Partnership is the term the global elites prefer to use because they perceive that it sounds quite harmless and benign to the public.

But in reality, the Public Private Partnership is nothing more than corporatism, fascism, protectionism, oligarchy, plutocracy and the total takeover of the world by corporations and the political class they fund.

Never before in human history has totalitarianism gone so global. Moreover, the NWO represents the corporate domination of all resources on the planet as well as the concentration of all wealth and power.

Financial Systems

Strengthening the international monetary and financial system is a priority in the wake of the global financial crisis.

Above all, the WEF is committed to preserving the world's central banking system that is directly responsible for creating so much impoverishment by wiping out the purchasing power of paper and central bank currency. Effectively, central banks exist for no purpose other than to transfer wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich. The plunder attributable to central banking systems is absolutely crucial to concentrating wealth and power. Sound money tends to concentrate in the hands of ordinary people and not the political and elite classes.

As a suffering humanity continues to be stung by rising costs for essentials like food, shelter and medicine, the ability of a person to even earn a living in a command and controlled economy dominated by corporatist and statist interests vanish quite quickly.

As the world's most powerful autocrats, bureaucrats, education-crats, corporations, corporatists, media and technology players continue to amass control as master propagandists and at the expense of property rights and individual liberty, the result will continue to be devastating.

The dominate themes of the NWO, the UN and the World Economic forum continue to be sustainability and civil society. Yet, social unrest from economic misery continues to escalate and civil society is crumbling under the weight of corporate and bureaucratic tyranny.

Where this will end is anybody's guess but it won't be good for the earth's occupants nor will it inspire peaceful co-existence, tolerance, civil liberties or prosperity.



http://judymorrisreport.blogspot.com...Real+People%29

[kathyet2]

More on this plan here at my other link:


http://www.alipac.us/f19/trans-pacif...-trade-295705/

[kathyet2]

Bill Gates Asks Fellow Billionaires to Help Reduce World’s Population

Posted about 2 days ago | 2 comments
Susanne Posel ,Chief Editor Occupy Corporatism | The US Independent
January 24, 2014


The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) have invested several billions of dollars into vaccine initiatives to fight the polio virus.
Bill Gates is encouraging fellow billionaires to do the same.
Gates is concerned about Nigeria and Pakistan because “local conspiracy theories have undermined inoculation drives.”
Gates said: “The truth is the vaccine is to help kids. And spreading rumors and attacking the workers on this – those people don’t have justice and truth on their side. And so we may miss by a year or two if we can’t help out with that. The president, the religious leaders a lot of the supporters of that country are trying to get the truth out.”
In Nigeria and Pakistan the effort has been “intensified” through the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI).
Gates said: “I think we’ve got the will. We need — on the ground — to get the truth out.”
In an interview with media, Gates explained: “Capitalism did not eradicate smallpox. It just doesn’t know how. Polio eradication is a work in progress, but it’s not being done by markets. So the childhood death reduction, the nutrition improvements, those are overwhelmingly aid-driven.”
When asked about the BMGF efforts to deal with “overpopulation”, Gates replied: “It’s a huge impediment in convincing rich-world donors that they should feel good about these health improvements. Our foundation focused in the 1990s on reproductive health. We weren’t nearly as big then. But we wanted to make contraception available because we thought population growth would make everything so difficult, whether it’s the environment or feeding kids or stability. It was only when we found out about this phenomenal connection between improved health and reduced population growth that we felt: Great, let’s just make the foundation as big as possible to go after these health problems. Because before then the commonsense thing was more kids would make these problems less tractable.”
Gates continued: “I don’t think people like to say out loud that we want to let these kids die because there are too many of them. But by choosing not to get into health in our early days I was a victim of the myth around overpopulation. But there is just phenomenally good news here. The world’s population will peak. Now, we do have huge population growth in places where we don’t want it, like Yemen and Pakistan and parts of Africa, where we don’t have the resources to really help those people. So we need to get serious about figuring out how to make sure there’s relative health and satisfaction in those places.”
The justification for Gates’ focus on reducing the world’s population was invoked in this comment: “We won’t need to answer the question of how much innovation allows us to support 20 or 30 billion people on the planet. It’s possible some miracle like reinventing photosynthesis could do it. We invest in miracles like that. But the amount of innovation it would take to support 20 billion or more is pretty phenomenal and would likely not show up in time. So the fact that the population will peak is great news. We’ve already had the largest birth cohort — the most children born in a year. We’re past the peak on that. We’ll probably only have to support 10 to 11 billion. Now we still need to raise food production and avoid climate change. And when people get richer we have to worry about things like diabetes. So I’m not saying fulfilling the development agenda makes the world all good. But in terms of injustice and equity, doubling down to finish the development agenda should be the top priority.”


- See more at: http://www.occupycorporatism.com/bil....FiRXLSJ7.dpuf




Disgusting man hope he and his family reap the rewards they so justly deserve

[kathyet2]

Media Research Center


Taxpayer money should not be ANYWHERE near Soros-funded journalism.

Read More: http://goo.gl/esU025

Do you agree??

[kathyet2]

Activist Post



With smashing timing, Bill and Melinda Gates released a missive in the Wall Street Journal about the three myths on the world’s poor coinciding with a report announcing that the top richest 85 people (a list they are solidly on) in the world have more money than the poorest 3.5 billion. This is an insane wealth gap...



Eugenics and Population Control: How the 85 richest see the 3.5 billion poorest
activistpost.com








Sunday, January 26, 2014

Eugenics and Population Control: How the 85 richest see the 3.5 billion poorest


Aaron Dykes and Melissa Melton
Activist Post

Bill Gates Applauds Thailand’s Demographic Suicide

With smashing timing, Bill and Melinda Gates released a missive in the Wall Street Journal about the three myths on the world’s poor coinciding with a report announcing that the top richest 85 people (a list they are solidly on) in the world have more money than the poorest 3.5 billion or 50% of the entire world’s population.

This is an insane wealth gap. These people and their bajillions are essentially running the world.


Published on Jan 23, 2014
With smashing timing, Bill and Melinda Gates released a missive in the Wall Street Journal about the three myths on the world's poor coinciding with a report announcing that the top richest 85 people (a list they are solidly on) in the world have more money than the poorest 3.5 billion or 50% of the entire world's population.

This is an insane wealth gap. These people and their bajillions are essentially running the world.

In the third myth of their response, the Gates' commend Thailand as a great example of family planning because Thai women went from having an average of six children per woman just a few decades ago to having an average of 1.6 children today.

There's just one problem. Replacement rate — that is the number of children needed to maintain a stable population — is 2.1 (but it's even higher for countries with higher mortality rates). That means that Thailand is below replacement rate, a reality that is screwing up the country's social and economic foundations.

It's so bad in Thailand, actually, that articles have detailed the "aging crisis" the country now faces due to the low birth rate (example: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101119344). In fact, all the Asian nations are now facing this issue, and most of the developed world is below replacement rate as well.

Leave it to Bill Gates, billionaire eugenicist extraordinaire, to applaud a country for committing demographic suicide.

For more on conscience laundering and the Charitable-Industrial Complex: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/27/opi...

Website: TruthstreamMedia.com
Twitter: @TruthstreamNews
FB: Facebook.com/TruthstreamMedia

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~**~*~*~*~*~ *~*~*~*~*~*~
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

• Category
  
  People & Blogs
  
  
• License
  
  Standard YouTube License
  

In the third myth of their response, the Gates’ commend Thailand as a great example of family planning because Thai women went from having an average of six children per woman just a few decades ago to having an average of 1.6 children today.

There’s just one problem. Replacement rate — that is the number of children needed to maintain a stable population — is 2.1 (but it’s even higher for countries with higher mortality rates). That means that Thailand is below replacement rate, a reality that is screwing up the country’s social and economic foundations.
It’s so bad in Thailand, actually, that articles have detailed the “aging crisis” the country now faces due to the low birth rate. In fact, all the Asian nations are now facing this issue, and most of the developed world is below replacement rate as well.

Leave it to Bill Gates, billionaire eugenicist extraordinaire, to applaud a country for committing demographic suicide.

For more on “conscience laundering” and the Charitable-Industrial Complex: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/27/op...plex.html?_r=0

Population Control: A Centuries Old Agenda Driven by Philanthropic Dollars

For just over a century, since its formation in 1913, the Rockefeller Foundation and other organizations created by the Rockefeller Dynasty have steered the direction of global attitudes towards population, birth control and eugenics.

Elite money from the East Coast of America joined with the aristocratically-inclined scientific crowd from Britain to create an organized attempt to establish Eugenics as a mindset that enabled elite control, and gave a rationale for reigning in the procreation of those declared unfit. Leading industrial magnates threw the weight of their wealth behind the fields of social work, genetics, medicine, public health agencies and politics to establish new offices, new organization and new laws to enforce Eugenics – declaring the unfit stripped of their right to breed, while glorifying the reproduction of best as progressors of the race of the world state.

The Rockefellers were leaders in this area, using their foundation to pursue Eugenics in university research and attempt to engineer a ‘new Man’ by controlling the science of life and establishing a tyranny over the reproductive cycle. Privately the Rockefellers funded Margaret Sanger, founder of the organization that became Planned Parenthood and who stirred controversy in Congressional testimony for breaking laws by promoting birth control. It also funded extreme eugenicists like Paul Popenoe in America and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Nazi Germany, set up explicitly to study eugenics under individuals like the notorious Josef Mengele.

After WWII and the stain of the Nazis, the Rockefellers helped Eugenics shed its dark associations and re-brand under cause like “Family Planning & Worldwide Planned Parenthood” through organizations which most notably include John D. Rockefeller III’s Population Council. Rockefeller money paid for lots of propaganda and instituted involuntary sterilization programs in Puerto Rico, Brazil and California, among many other locales. National Family Planning ministries in India, China, Peru and elsewhere have enforced compulsory sterilization and/or birth limits with often dictatorial and genocidal population control methods. Family planning programs were pushed on most of the developing nations of the world, with special emphasis on the top countries with the largest population growth – which was echoed in State Department and National Security policy through Henry Kissinger’s 1974 NSSM #200 memo which identified population as a major threat to national security and recommended the use of “food as a weapon” in order to curb populations.

In later years, the Rockefeller Foundation funded the development of genetically engineered edible contraceptive plants, such as through the work of Charles Arntzen (and with eerie parallels through the Epicyte episode). The Rockefeller Foundation also quietly funded an anti-fertility in the HcG vaccine which was used covertly with the widely distributed tetanus vaccine, which served as a carrier to trigger autoimmune response to HcG and trigger spontaneous abortion and infertility. Scientific studies have demonstrated the undisclosed use of this HcG infertility vaccine in the Phillipines and Thailand.

All this was done as Rockefeller dollars also heavy funded the medical industry and pushed the use of vaccines worldwide. More recently, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation became the foremost player in philanthropy and formed multiple alliances with the Rockefeller Foundation, agreeing to use its funds to pursue their goals. This can been seen in the GAVI vaccine alliance, AGRA (the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa) and CGIAR (the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research), among others, pushing vaccines and GMO crops on the developing and developed world alike.

Since that time, Gates and Rockefeller have taken things a step further, organizing a Bilderberg-style secret meeting among billionaire philanthropists to coordinate the agenda for population control efforts and other leading issues. It was covered in the media in glowing light, portraying these billionaire control freaks as literal superheroes and ‘saviors of the planet.’

Aaron Dykes previously covered how grant money from the Gates Foundation inadvertently pays for good press.

Here’s just a few examples of slanted coverage in the London Guardian’s 2009 article on the so-called “Good Club.”

• “Few doubt the good intentions of Gates and Winfrey and their kind. They have already improved the lives of millions of poor people across the developing world. But can the richest people on earth actually save the planet?”
• “Sources say Gates was the most impressive speaker, while Turner was the most outspoken.”
• “There is little doubt that members of the Good Club have done amazing work.”
• “The Soros Foundation has done valuable work setting up democratic institutions and independent media across the former Soviet bloc.” [Editor's Note: Soros's actions here are less philanthropy and more, arguably, tantamount to covert regime change in tandem with U.S. policy objectives]

These types of praiseworthy propaganda lines are rampant, custom design to laud billionaires like Gates and Rockefeller, while lifting them up on a pedestal that projects their importance and appears to lend credence to their self-appointed and assumed seat at the helm of the world ship – in their decidedly undemocratic ways.

The Guardian did manage to carry some criticism of the “Good Club.” Paul Harris wrote:

The existence of the Good Club has struck many as a two-edged sword. On one hand, they represent a new golden age of philanthropy, harking back to the early 20th century when the likes of Rockefeller, Vanderbilt and Carnegie became famous for their good works. Yet the reach and power of the Good Club are truly new. Its members control vast wealth – and with that wealth comes huge power that could reshape nations according to their will.

[...]

There is also the issue of accountability. Even the most repressive of national governments is on some level beholden to its own people, or has the capacity to change and reform under popular pressure. But who votes for the Good Club?

No one. That’s the point. These are a tiny class of people that have appointed themselves to fix the problems of the world – in their own ways.

The same wealth disparity that has made the world’s 85 richest worth more than half of the entire global population has given them big enough heads to think they can call the shots.

And who will stop them? Who will even point out the harm, rather than just assume they are saints and thank their unilateral actions?

Related Activist Post Article:
Dawn of The Singularity: Superheroes of Science to Rescue Humanity From Itself?

Aaron and Melissa created TruthstreamMedia.com, where this first appeared, as an outlet to examine the news, place it in a broader context, uncover the deceptions, pierce through the fabric of illusions, grasp the underlying factors, know the real enemy, unshackle from the system, and begin to imagine the path towards taking back our lives, one step at a time, so that one day we might truly be free...

http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/...ol-how-85.html

[kathyet2]

Sugar Daddies for the Global Left


Cliff Kincaid — January 23, 2014
No comments | Printer Friendly








It turns out that abortion zealot Wendy Davis of Texas was put through law school by a wealthy husband who took care of her children. She had been depicted by the liberal media, including The Huffington Post, as a struggling single teenage mom who made it on her own. But the curiosities don’t end there. Arianna Huffington has her own sugar daddy—Nicolas Berggruen, a German-born billionaire who has just provided her with the big money for a new global media venture, The World Post.
The Huffington Post, a platform for advocates of abortion and homosexual rights and marijuana legalization, was named after Arianna Huffington’s ex-husband, Michael Huffington, who was born rich and then turned gay. She used his money from a divorce settlement to start the on-line news service in 2005.
One of her co-founders, the late Andrew Breitbart, left in disgust over its leftist tilt to start a conservative alternative, now called Breitbart News.
The Huffington Post specializes in covering alleged “shocking” statements by conservatives and Republicans, and demonizing those who disagree with the “progressive” agenda. It has been described by critics as a platform for “anti-Israel hate speech and anti-Semitism,” as well as a mouthpiece for Al Jazeera and various terrorist groups. It employs personnel from Al Jazeera and Moscow-funded Russia Today, and even hosts a blog written by Russian ruler Vladimir Putin.
In this case, with the launch of The World Post at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Huffington is really going global.
The theme of this year’s 44th World Economic Forum Annual Meeting is “The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for Society, Politics and Business,” which means not only saluting China’s emergence as a global power, but facilitating Iran’s entry into the “international community” as one of the world’s future top 10 economies.
Several hundred major corporations and foundations finance the World Economic Forum, making it a powerhouse on the global stage.
Huffington’s new partner, Berggruen, also finances the Berggruen Institute. It is dedicated to “the design and implementation of new ideas of good governance—drawing from practices in both East and West—that can be brought to bear on the common challenges of globalization in the 21st century.” It also wants to create institutions to “competently manage the global links of interdependence.”
The World Post fits in nicely with the theme of this year’s meeting, outlined in the release of a document, “Global Risks 2014,” which complains that “weak or inadequate global institutions” have impeded attempts “to cooperate on addressing global risks.”
Translated into ordinary language, this means the convergence of the capitalist and communist systems, leading to some form of one world government. And The World Post is shaping up as the house organ for this new world order.
Nicolas Berggruen and Nathan Gardels, who is editor-in-chief of The World Post, have written the book, Intelligent Governance for the 21st Century: A Middle Way between West and East.
In other words, capitalism is finished. It fulfills the vision of another billionaire, George Soros, the hedge fund operator who has declared capitalism to be the real global threat to the world. Soros is a frequent speaker at the World Economic Forum and is there this time as well.
Echoing the view that America is in decline under President Obama, the home page of the Berggruen organization openly declares, “The great transition of our time is from American-led globalization” to “the interdependence of plural identities,” as “the dominance of the West recedes with the rise of the rest.”
Those “plural identities” are American adversaries and enemies.
However, the “ideas of good governance” from the East, highlighted by a lead interview in The World Post with the Chinese president, come at a time when a CNN crew has been “roughed up” in China while trying to cover the trial of a human rights lawyer.
Interestingly, a new survey shows that Chinese communist leaders preside over far more “inequality” than the “capitalist” political leaders in America.
But Chinese communism is a system the elites can work with.
This emerging new world order will also include terrorist regimes like Iran, whose President Hassan Rouhani recently delivered a “message of friendship and hope” to the global elites in Davos.
“My social, political, economic view is one of prudent moderation,” Rouhani declared. “Iran-U.S. relations have entered a new phase.”
Other leaders attending and speaking at the event come from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Mexico, Nigeria, South Korea and Britain.
Although President Obama is not attending, several Obama administration officials will be there. Plus, former Democratic Vice President Al Gore is a featured speaker on “climate change.”
Huffington’s World Post figures to be an international version of The Huffington Post, which regards new sanctions on Iran as an unseemly rush to “war.” It vigorously supports Obama’s Iran nuclear deal, which is also backed by China and Russia.
According to his biography, World PosteditorGardels was executive director of the Institute for National Strategy where he conducted policy research at the USA-Canada Institute in Moscow before the end of the Cold War, and also at the People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs in Beijing. The USA-Canada Institute in Moscow was a Soviet Communist Party-run organization “created solely to serve Soviet intelligence organizations and needs,” the Heritage Foundation noted in a 1982 study.
The pro-communist tone of The World Post is unmistakable: “Even many liberals in China today doubt whether one-person-one-vote multiparty democracy is the best way to govern a society as large and complex as China,” Gardels writes.
According to these “liberals,” he adds, “…the [Chinese] Communist Party, afflicted as it may be with corruption and princeling privilege, is not a dictatorship. For them it is a 78 million strong consensus-forming body that arrives at agreement on long-term policies and then grants the collective leadership the power to decisively implement them.”
“To become truly global in their outlook, the Davos elites must widen their view to take into account the path set by China’s leaders,” his article advises.
The launch of Huffington’s new publication featured Chrystia Freeland speaking “on the growing backlash against the world’s super-rich,” and the publication of her article for The World Post headlined, “Thanks to Pope Francis, Revolt Against the Global Super-Rich Is Underway.”
Yet the super-rich are running this show and financing The World Post.
In his special message to the group, Pope Francis “called on the world’s business and political leaders to use determination and far-sightedness in their efforts to promote inclusiveness and rid the world of social exclusion,” according to a press release. “I ask you to ensure that humanity is served by wealth and not ruled by it,” the pope said in his official remarks.
The message was read by Cardinal Peter Turkson, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, who played a role in formulating a Vatican document calling for the creation of a “central world bank.”
The Vatican had previously called for a “world political authority” to be created.
Echoing a Democratic Party 2014 political campaign theme, in order to divert attention away from government failures on health care and jobs, a press release said the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks 2014 report “finds income disparity the most likely risk to cause an impact on a global scale in the next decade.”
Translated into ordinary language, this means more “redistribution of the wealth,” this time on a global scale. Make way for the transition from capitalism to socialism.
The Pope meets with Obama in March for what the White House calls a discussion on “their shared commitment to fighting poverty and growing inequality.”
In addition to Arianna Huffington, whose official titles include chair, president, and editor-in-chief of The Huffington Post Media Group, other media figures at the World Economic Forum include:

• Fareed Zakaria, CNN
• Ali Velshi, Al Jazeera America
• Stephanie Ruhle, Bloomberg Television
• Maria Bartiromo, Fox Business Network
• Gerard Baker, The Wall Street Journal

Despite the presence of these Big Media personalities, it is doubtful that the details surrounding the rather explicit push for global government at Davos will be reported to the American people and exposed for what it is.

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/sugar-daddies-for-the-global-left/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=82f5f2b1b5-email012414&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c4ddfc8d9d-82f5f2b1b5-224224701

[kathyet2]

Bill Gates on GM foods, vaccines and Monsanto Nwo Puppet




Uploaded on Mar 5, 2011
Many have long suspected that U.S. policy on genetically modified (GM) organisms was being influenced by the multinational corporations that profit from genetic engineering and the export-oriented agribusiness. However, recently released Wikileaks cables document just how close that relationship has become.

The U.S. Department of State has virtually become an agency for promoting the private interests of the Monsanto Corporation.

As European social movements pressure their governments for an ongoing moratorium on GM seeds and foods, Monsanto and other biotech corporations have been pushing to find new market footholds, using hybrids even in impoverished Haiti following the January 12, 2010 earthquake. They have been pursuing such goals in collaboration with USAID, the U.S. State Department and the Gates Foundation Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)

• Category
  
  Education
• License
  
  Standard YouTube License
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_Gi6cf-jiI

Bill Gates Admits Vaccines Are Used for Human Depopulation






Uploaded on Feb 28, 2010
Next are two short excerpts from a recently filmed TED presentation (Feb 2010) by none other than Bill "Microsoft" Gates.

At the heart of Gates' address lies the central Global Warming dogma, which dictates that Co2 emitted by human beings are the primary culprit for the unwanted heating of the globe. Since this artificial alleged human-induced heating effect allegedly stands to devastate the planet if left unabated, Global Warming dogma proponents therefore argue that human Co2 emissions must be drastically reduced. As Gates casually addresses the issue, he goes on to state that one way to accomplish this goal is to reduce the global human population.

ERRATUM: To be completely fair and accurate, I should have stated that Gates seeks to reduce the anticipated growth of the human population rather than that he seeks to reduce the current population. I admit that the latter slogan, that is contained in the video, is a bit misleading and I do not want to insinuate that Gates seeks to kill off currently living people. He rather seeks to lower the projected population growth.

He postulates the central equation, giving an estimation of the humanly emitted C02 load per year, to be:

Co2 = P times S times E times C

Where P stands for the population number, S the average number of services per person, E the average amount of energy units per service, and C the average Co2 emitted load per unit of service, per year; Co2 stands for the projected total humanly emitted carbon-dioxide load by the entire population per year.

In the first clip you will hear him state in plain language that he considers VACCINES to be desirable to bring down the future population number P and so reduce Co2. You will also casually hear him promoting HEALTH CARE and REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, to accomplish that same C02 reducing goal.

Here are Bill Gates' verbatim words [square parentheses additions for clarification purposes are mine though]:
"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [number of 9 billion] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent. But there we see an increase of about 1.3 [billion]."

Let's focus on the vaccines. Gates is stating that he considers vaccines to be useful in contributing to bring the projected population growth of 2.2 billion down to 1.3 billion, roughly one billion. What kind of properties can thus reasonably be deduced that vaccines are to have according to Gates? Well, basically all the properties that impede people to either have children, or successfully rear them. In other words, Gates implicitly advocates the definition of his favorite kind of vaccine to be one that fosters infertility, sterility and (early onset) senility (autism) alike. Note that Gates does not mention a word on the much touted purported intention of vaccines: to offer protection against relevant diseases and therefore as such, precisely prolong life. Given the abundance of toxins in vaccines (see my blog for some links of simply Google "toxin ingredient vaccine"), the position that vaccines contribute to decrease mortality rates, is kind of hard to maintain.

So Gates proves to be quite the humanitarian there huh?

In the second excerpt you hear Gates explain what he considers to be the single most important thing that he would choose to see become a reality in the future time span of 50 years. He again confirms his "love" for the vaccine.

Download Video:
http://www.mediafire.com/?mdyftvyghyo
Blog:
http://1phil4everyill.wordpress.com/2...
Sources:
http://www.autismtodayonline.com/2010...
http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates.html
Bill Gates on energy: Innovating to zero!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaF-fq...

• Category
  
  Education
• License
  
  Standard YouTube License
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WQtRI7A064
• Sen Rockefeller: Let's Depopulate!!! Kill the Elders and Poison the children!!!!
  
  
• Sen. Rockefeller on health care
  Octuber,31 2009
  
  
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3t8BC8XyTg

[kathyet2]

(Official Movie) THRIVE: What On Earth Will It Take?



Published on Apr 5, 2012
* Join us on Facebook! http://www.facebook.com/ThriveMovement
* Buy the DVD w/ 50+ minutes of bonus features: http://www.thrivemovement.com/store
* Donate to support the THRIVE Movement: http://www.thrivemovement.com/donations

If you value what is presented in this movie, please go to http://thrivemovement.com/ where you can support Thrive Movement by making a donation. You will also find more in-depth information on each of the subjects discussed in the movie, learn about Critical Mass initiatives supported by Thrive, and connect with others who are waking up and taking action.

Film Synopsis:
THRIVE is an unconventional documentary that lifts the veil on what's REALLY going on in our world by following the money upstream -- uncovering the global consolidation of power in nearly every aspect of our lives. Weaving together breakthroughs in science, consciousness and activism, THRIVE offers real solutions, empowering us with unprecedented and bold strategies for reclaiming our lives and our future.

http://www.thrivemovement.com/

• Category
  
  Film & Animation
  
  
• License
  
  Standard YouTube License
  

[kathyet2]

THE END OF AMERICA 2014-2016: "IT'S WORSE THAN YOU KNOW



ublished on Nov 21, 2013 Jason A Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/End-Ti...

MARTIAL LAW drills across the country, liberties being stripped away daily, the increasing biometric presence, police brutality
-------SHARE----------

• Category
  
  News & Politics
• License
  
  Standard YouTube License
• Full length movies below
  End of America A movie you must see to believe YouTube 1
  
  

Published on Dec 6, 2012
Naomi Wolf presents you with the truth.

• Category
  
  News & Politics
  
  
• License
  
  Standard YouTube License
  

[kathyet2]

"Soros Put" Hits Record As Billionaire's Downside Hedge Rises By 154% in Q4 To $1.3 Billion


Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/17/2014 22:15 -0500

A curious finding emerged in the latest 13F by Soros Fund Management, the family office investment vehicle managing the personal wealth of George Soros.

Actually, two curious findings: the first was that the disclosed Assets Under Management as of December 31, 2013 rose to a record $11.8 billion (this excludes netting and margin, and whatever one-time positions Soros may have gotten an SEC exemption to not disclose: for a recent instance of this, see Greenlight Capital's Micron fiasco, and the subsequent lawsuit of Seeking Alpha which led to the breach of David Einhorn's holdings confidentiality).

The second one is that the "Soros put", a legacy hedge position that the 83-year old has been rolling over every quarter since 2010, just rose to a record $1.3 billion or the notional equivalent of some 7.09 million SPY-equivalent shares. Since this was an increase of 154% Q/Q this has some people concerned that the author of 'reflexivity' and the founder of "open societies" may be anticipating some major market downside.
Then again, as the chart below shows, as a percentage of total AUM, the put position rose to 11.1% of his notional holdings. By way of reference, as of June 30 2013, his SPY put may have had a smaller notional value, but it represented both more shares (7.8 million), and was far greater as a % of AUM, at 13.5%.





Finally, remember that what was disclosed on Friday is a snapshot of Soros' holdings as of 45 days ago. What he may or may not have done with his hedge since then is largely unknown, and since there are no investor letters, there is no way of knowing even on a leaked basis how the billionaire has since positioned for the market.

That said, while the SPY puts are most likely simply a hedge to his overall bullish exposure, perhaps more notable was the $25 million call position that Soros put on the gold miners ETF which has been beaten into oblivion over the past year, in the fourth quarter. Does Soros think that it is finally the miners' turn to shine?


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-0...-q4-13-billion

Billionaire Soros is betting big the the market will tank soon....wouldn't it be poetic justice if it doesn't!!