Thread: Fred Thompson? Better think Twice!

Lately i've been seeing alot of support for Fred Thompson which in itself is very disturbing, some facts, He sits on the Counsil of Foreign Relations and the American Enterprise Institute, Chief Architects of NAFTA,CAFTA. and presently ingaged in forming the NAU(North American Union) with the SPP. He's part of the Good old boy network of Beltway Politics that got this country in trouble in the first place. People please do your research before supporting somebody or you may regret it!

Fred Thompson has a way of talking that almost makes you think he is against "giving citizenship" to lawbreakers. Dig deeper and you will find he supports taking the 12,000,000 into America's waiting arms. Also, check his voting record for the SHORT time he was in office. He voted yes on anything immigration.

When Ronnie was running for Prez, there was a concern about him being an actor..this concern may not be off the mark.

DON'T VOTE FOR ANYONE WHO IS A MEMBER OF THE CFR!

I posted some information on him here! Also o n the NAU...incase there are still some who do not know about this.

http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ht=#365136

Unless Hunter, Paul or Tancredo becomes the Republican presidential nominee, I'll be voting Constitution Party.

See: www.conservativeexodusproject.com/

Those are the only three I will be looking at also! The rest have been bought!

Ron Paul---------Prez
Tom Tancredo---Vice Prez
Duncan Hunter--Sec of State

Nothing like a breath of fresh air for our Constitution!

From what I have been reading, Tancredo is actually preferred over Paul.

It gets tiresome having ignorant neo mercantilists post with the attitude that they are the anti amnesty movement. Read Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations" or Roy Beck of NumbersUSA's articles on protectionism.

It was problems external to the NAFTA Treaty which has made NAFTA less successful than it should have been but it was and still is a good idea and both countries have benefited from it.

Unfortunately the open border has drawn Mexicans here and a failure to attract effort and capital to rural value added agriculture and labor intensive manufacturing prolongs them.

It would be beneficial if the Mexican labor laws were less cumbersome. If the Mexicans can organize so well to violate our immigration law then if we start enforcing it the Mexicans might start putting their efforts into bypassing their own labor law to
create jobs.

Rather than eliminate NAFTA the Americans would be better served getting the Chinese to float the Yuan.

Originally Posted by Richard

It gets tiresome having ignorant neo mercantilists post with the attitude that they are the anti amnesty movement. Read Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations" or Roy Beck of NumbersUSA's articles on protectionism.

It was problems external to the NAFTA Treaty which has made NAFTA less successful than it should have been but it was and still is a good idea and both countries have benefited from it.

Unfortunately the open border has drawn Mexicans here and a failure to attract effort and capital to rural value added agriculture and labor intensive manufacturing prolongs them.

It would be beneficial if the Mexican labor laws were less cumbersome. If the Mexicans can organize so well to violate our immigration law then if we start enforcing it the Mexicans might start putting their efforts into bypassing their own labor law to
create jobs.

Rather than eliminate NAFTA the Americans would be better served getting the Chinese to float the Yuan.

It gets tiresome having ignorant NAFTA-boosters posting about how NAFTA was a good idea.

Why is a sovereignty-stealing "agreement", that has a transnational bureaucracy to administer it, a good idea? NAFTA, like it's mutant child CAFTA, is more about regionalization, than it is about "free trade".