Thread: Glenn Beck Calls For Obama to Be Impeached Over Waiving Ban on Arming Terrorists

Glenn Beck Calls For Obama to Be Impeached Over Waiving Ban on Arming Terrorists to Arm Syrian Rebels

Posted on September 17, 2013 by BMartin1776

Glenn Beck explains why he is calling for the emperor, as well as people like John McCain, to be impeached over waiving a ban on arming terrorists. He even takes it a step further calling what 0bama has done is an act of treason because arming the Syrian rebels is aiding and abetting our enemies!

We know the rebels in Syria are composed of a handful of legit freedom fighters who have been completely co-opted by the muslim brotherhood, Al Qaeda, Al Nusra, Hezbollah, Hamas, Iranian Revolutionary Guard and the list goes on and on. These terror organizations ARE the ENEMIES of the United States which obama is now going to officially lend aid to with the stroke of a pen. Meanwhile our elected leaders continue to sit on the sidelines silent, doing nothing.

What this all breaks down to is the imperial emperor waives a law, ban on arming terrorists, so he can legally commit treason! We live in a crazy world for sure. What exactly are the people to do when our elected leaders can change the rules of the game as it goes along?
…..

Obama waives ban on arming terrorists to allow aid to Syrian opposition

by Joel Gehrke | Washington Examiner

President Obama waived a provision of federal law designed to prevent the supply of arms to terrorist groups to clear the way for the U.S. to provide military assistance to “vetted” opposition groups fighting Syrian dictator Bashar Assad.

Some elements of the Syrian opposition are associated with radical Islamic terrorist groups, including al Qaeda, which was responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks in New York, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, Pa., in 2001. Assad’s regime is backed by Iran and Hezbollah.

The president, citing his authority under the Arms Export Control Act, announced today that he would “waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related to such a transaction.”

Those two sections prohibit sending weaponry to countries described in section 40(d): “The prohibitions contained in this section apply with respect to a country if the Secretary of State determines that the government of that country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism,” Congress stated in the Arms Control Export Act.

“For purposes of this subsection, such acts shall include all activities that the Secretary determines willfully aid or abet the international proliferation of nuclear explosive devices to individuals or groups or willfully aid or abet an individual or groups in acquiring unsafeguarded special nuclear material,” the law continues.

The law allows the president to waive those prohibitions if he “determines that the transaction is essential to the national security interests of the United States.”…more

http://savingtherepublic.com/blog/20...syrian-rebels/

http://www.alipac.us/f9/barack-obama...9/#post1368061

Obama cites ‘legal basis’ for arming Syrian Rebels

by CONSERVATIVE ACTION ALERTS on SEPTEMBER 17, 2013

ALERT: Obama claims ‘Arms Export Control Act’ allows him to arm the Free Syrian Army! Take Action and Fax Congress!

Conservative American,

The fact that the U.S. Congress has not issued a Declaration of War is not stopping Barack Obama from unconstitutionally intervening in Syria.

Yesterday, President Obama quietly signed a Presidential Determination waiving sections 40 and 40(a) of the Arms Export Control Act – a move that allegedly allows him to fund terrorist organizations for the sake of “national security.”

What this means is that Obama is going to take the actions of war without Congress and fight his personal war against the Syrian government via the rebels.

While Obama cites the AECA as legal basis for “assisting” the Free Syrian Army, law elsewhere patently describes such actions as illegal. The fact is, the U.S. Government is prohibited from assisting coup d’états or any type of government takeover according to Section 7008 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Act of 2012 (division I of Public Law 112-74; 125 Stat. 1195).

As Congress has not declared war on Syria and has not appropriated any funds to pay for the weapons Obama wishes to transfer, Obama’s latest actions clearly show that he is dangerously close to committing an impeachable offense!

Let it be said that arming the Free Syrian Army is not necessary for our national security!

Take action! Blast faxes to Congress demanding that they commit toimpeach, convict, and remove Obama from office if he engages in any unconstitutional military action in Syria!

** Make sure you add your name to our petition demanding Congress to impeach Obama over unconstitutional military action! Add your name here!

Constitutional Contempt

The Obama Administration’s contempt for the Constitution is reaching unprecedented heights.

Secretary of State John Kerry recently argued that Obama has a so-called ‘right’ to take the country to war without the consent of Congress!

The Secretary told several media outlets that Obama has the power to go to war alone, presumably even if Congress votes against entering into war with Syria in the coming days.

Speaking to George Stephanopoulos, Kerry had the audacity to say:

“The President of the United States has the right to take this action, doesn’t have to go to Congress, but he does so with the belief – and this is why I think it’s courageous – the president knows that America is stronger when we act in unity.”

Can you believe this? This claim is in flagrant opposition to the U.S. Constitution!

Obama has zero power to declare or take actions of war without the express approval of the U.S. Congress! This is made clear in Article I, Section 8 of the “Supreme Law” – the one that Obama and Kerry swore to uphold and protect.

Bogus claims like these not only smack of tyranny, but tell us that the Obama Administration is prepared to do whatever it takes - with or without Congress - to take our nation to war, even before the facts are settled!

Right now we need to demand lawmakers to prepare to remove Obama from office if he decides to take any actions of war without their approval!

Obama has not the power to drop a single bomb or provide the rebels with a single bullet without Congressional authorization!

Take action! Blast faxes to Congress demanding that they commit toimpeach, convict, and remove Obama from office if he engages in any unconstitutional military action in Syria!

** Make sure you add your name to our petition demanding Congress to impeach Obama over unconstitutional military action! Add your name here!

“Engaging our military in Syria when no direct threat to the United States exists and without prior congressional authorization would violate the separation of powers that is clearly delineated in the Constitution.” – Rep. Scott Rigell (R-VA)

Obama Wants War

It’s clear that Barack Obama wants to take our nation to war with Syria. He has said is looking at taking “limited, narrow” actions against the forces of Bashar al-Assad.

Obama even said: “I believe I have the authority to carry out this military action [in Syria] without specific congressional authorization.”

That’s right; Obama intends to unconstitutionally take actions of war against the Syrian government even though Congress - not the President - is vested with the power to declare war.

A bipartisan coalition of 116 House members sent Obama a letter urging him to refrain from taking actions of war without their authorization, but Obama doesn’t seem to care. In fact, he is dangerously close to single-handedly taking our nation to war in a manner that the Supreme Law prohibits.

Again, any action Obama takes without Congress is prohibited as our nation has not been attacked and our national security not at stake. This said, Obama cannot transfer a single weapon to the Syrian army or authorize a single drone-strike on his own power!

This is why we need to mobilize right away and tell lawmakers to prepare toremove Obama from office if he engages us in an undeclared, unconstitutional war!

Take action! Blast faxes to Congress demanding that they commit toimpeach, convict, and remove Obama from office if he engages in any unconstitutional military action in Syria!

** Make sure you add your name to our petition demanding Congress to impeach Obama over unconstitutional military action! Add your name here!

“For too long, the legislature’s responsibility to authorize military force has been overlooked. It is time that we uphold the Constitution, which makes it clear in Article I, Section 8 that Congress alone holds the power to declare war.” – Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC).

H. Con. Res. 40

Any military action ordered by Obama in the absence of a Congressional Declaration of War is an impeachable offense in violation of the Constitution and the War Powers Resolution of 1973.

That’s why Rep. Walter Jones introduced H. Con. Res. 40 to prohibit Obama from “initiating war against Syria without express congressional authorization.”

The crux of the bill is as follows:

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that-
(1) the President is prohibited under the Constitution from the offensive use of the United States Armed Forces in Syria without prior express authorization by an Act of Congress or without a prior express appropriation of funds for that purpose by an Act of Congress; and
(2) the President’s defiance of those constitutional limitations on his authority to initiate war would constitute an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.

America can’t afford to go to war without debate, and Obama is bound by oath to honor that fact. With the exception of our nation being physically attacked, the President cannot wage war; he can only preside over war once it has been declared by the People’s Congress. Should Obama fail to recognize this, Congress must swiftly remove him from his presidential seat.
Take action and call as many U.S. lawmakers as you can - see our Congressional Directory - and make sure you add your name to our petition here.

Take action! Blast faxes to Congress demanding that they commit toimpeach, convict, and remove Obama from office if he engages in any unconstitutional military action in Syria!



For America,
Conservative Action Alerts
www.ConservativeActionAlerts.com

P.S. Obama cannot constitutional “wage war” – only Congress can. Tell your lawmakers to poise themselves to impeach Obama if he decides to authorize military action in Syria without Congress’ permission. Sign our petition and send free letters here.

Take action! Blast faxes to Congress demanding that they commit toimpeach, convict, and remove Obama from office if he engages in any unconstitutional military action in Syria!

Conservative Action Alerts (CAA) is a media outlet protected by the first amendment; no financial contribution to support our efforts is tax-deductible. Diener Consultants, Inc., 10940 S Parker Rd Ste# 763, PARKER, CO 80284-7440
Tagged as: Arms Export Control Act, barack obama, Civil War in Syria, H. Con. Res. 40, rebel funding, syria

http://www.conservativeactionalerts....syrian-rebels/

http://www.alipac.us/f19/bush-obama-...manity-277376/

Obama Arms Terrorist By Removing Federal Ban

Posted by: Corey Pepple
Posted date: September 17, 2013 In: News, Videos

President Barack Obama announced on Monday he would remove the federal law intended to prevent the provision of weapons to terrorists groups for the purpose of providing arms and other military aid to the Syrian rebels, the Washington Examiner’s Joel Gehrke reports.

Several radical Islamic terrorist groups, including al Qaeda, have joined forces with the Syrian rebels in the goal to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The Washington Examiner reports:

The president, citing his authority under the Arms Export Control Act, announced today that he would “waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related to such a transaction.”

Those two sections prohibit sending weaponry to countries described in section 40(d): “The prohibitions contained in this section apply with respect to a country if the Secretary of State determines that the government of that country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism,” Congress stated in the Arms Control Export Act.

“For purposes of this subsection, such acts shall include all activities that the Secretary determines willfully aid or abet the international proliferation of nuclear explosive devices to individuals or groups or willfully aid or abet an individual or groups in acquiring unsafeguarded special nuclear material,” the law continues.

President Obama has the ability to remove the restrictions if he “determines that the transaction is essential to the national security interests of the United States.”

It is uncertain how weaponizing the Syrian rebels could be seen as “essential to the national security interests of the United States.” However, Obama is stating the claim that chemical weapons in the hands of Assad is a nation security threat to the United States.

Last week, the Washington Post reported on a “major escalation of the U.S. role in Syria’s civil war” after Obama’s White House proceeded with its vow to provide “lethal aid” to the rebels.



Weapons shipments of light arms and other munitions were delivered to the rebels in addition to nonlethal gear such as sophisticated communications equipment, advanced combat medical kits and vehicles.

Corey Pepple is a freelance writer that runs a conservative Facebook fan page at Conservatives Exposing Liberal Lies and a home based business with his wife at http://christypepple.myitworks.com/


http://freepatriot.org/2013/09/17/ob...-removing-ban/

95% Of Violent Conflicts Around The World Are Muslim.

Posted on 9/17/2013 by admin

By: Joseph Wouk

This may sound like propaganda because it sounds so far fetched. It isn’t. Check your own world almanac….

Radical Islam has spread a scourge of violence around the globe that otherwise simply wouldn’t exist. It is time for the West to put an end to this horror. The first step is to destroy Iran as the world leader of Islamic violence.

As long as Iran threatens the world with nuclear Islamic fundamentalism there is simply no way to quash the continuing outbreak of Islamic violence worldwide. The Western democracies should crush the atavistic and xenophobic leader of this retreat from civilization.

If Iran is convincingly neutralized, it’s possible that the rest of the radical Islamic movements will realize that the way to accomplish their aspirations is through peaceful coexistence. Otherwise the monomaniacal dream of global Islamic domination will continue to destabilize the world until an apocalyptic result ensues.

The latest catastrophic, meaningless Islamic bloodletting is occurring in Kyrgyzstan. The Russians want no part of it and won’t intervene.
…

For more on this article click warsclerotic


http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2013/09/17...ld-are-muslim/

AVOW (Another Voice of Warning)

http://www.alipac.us/f9/glenn-beck-d...8/#post1368166

Glenn Beck: " I Personally Am Calling for the Impeachment of the President of the United States "

Added by Darla Dawald, National Director on September 17, 2013 at 9:39pm



9/17/13 - For the very first time, Glenn Beck called for President Obama to be impeached. Why? Because Beck believes that aiding al-Qaeda affiliated rebels in Syria by targeting the government is "the height of insanity" and illegality, and anyone seriously proposing that has to go. Beck made it clear exactly who he wants gone and why. "I personally am calling to impeach the President of the United States.

This is impeachable. He is arming known terrorists, and people like John McCain should be impeached as well."

He asked if arming a sworn enemy of the United States isn't an impeachable offense, what he hell is? He made it clear this isn't about politics, saying he wants people like McCain and Lindsay Graham to go to for lining up behind Obama on this.

Beck sighed, "We did not get into bed with Hitler to defeat Japan."

HAVE YOU PICKED UP OR RESOURCE?

The Case to Impeach
get yours here:
http://www.grassfirehq.com/44098/off...?Ref_ID=600040


http://patriotaction.net/video/video...sg_share_video

Welcome To Obama’s Syrian Twilight Zone: Gun Control To Prevent Terror Versus Arming Terrorists To Prevent Chemical Weapons

September 18, 2013 by Sam Rolley

UPI FILE

The Administration of Barack Obama is so dedicated to the idea of getting involved in Syria’s civil war, despite domestic and international objection to the U.S. meddling in the conflict, that it is willing not only to waive provisions of Federal law prohibiting the arming of terrorists but also to put its hypocrisy on full display.

Even as Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov are working on a deal to force Syrian President Bashar Assad to surrender his chemical weapons stockpiles to the international community in return for the assurance that the U.S. will not strike the Syrian government, the Federal government has made moves to ensure its ability to ship supplies to rebels in the Mideast nation.

The President announced earlier in the week that he would “waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A” of the Arms Export Control Act in order to provide assistance to Syrian rebels.

Those sections, which the President can waive if he “determines that the transaction is essential to the national security interests of the United States,” prohibit sending weaponry to countries:



“For purposes of this subsection, such acts shall include all activities that the Secretary determines willfully aid or abet the international proliferation of nuclear explosive devices to individuals or groups or willfully aid or abet an individual or groups in acquiring unsafeguarded special nuclear material,” reads subsection 40(d).

The Obama Administration contends that the provision was waived in order to provide “chemical weapons-related assistance” to “select vetted members” of the Syrian opposition forces.

“This action will allow the U.S. Government to provide . . . where appropriate, certain non-lethal assistance inside or related to Syria,” related to surviving chemical weapons attacks, according to National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden.

“This action is part of longstanding and ongoing efforts to provide life-saving chemical weapons-related assistance to people in need in Syria,” Hayden also said.

While the Administration claims that the action will apply only to chemical weapons survival equipment, the sections waived by the President could also apply to lethal munitions.

And some reports indicate U.S. munitions may have already begun making their way into rebel hands.

Via Reuterslast week:

The United States is providing lethal assistance “because they are sure that the mechanisms that the SMC has established are well tested and they will be sure that the weapons are not falling into the wrong hands,” [a spokesman for the Syrian Coalition of groups opposed to President Bashar al-Assad] said.

He apparently referred to Washington’s concerns that U.S. arms could end up benefiting radical Islamist groups, such as the al Nusra Front, active in northern Syria.

[The] comments at a Washington news conference may be the first public indication that U.S.-provided military goods such as arms or ammunition are actually moving to anti-Assad forces.

One U.S. government source said it was “unlikely” that any U.S.-supplied arms were on the ground in the hands of Syrian rebels at this time, while not dismissing the possibility that such aid was in the works.

Under section 40(g) of the AECA, Obama must provide Congress 15 days’ notice before handing supplies over to the rebels along with “the name of any country involved in the proposed transaction, the identity of any recipient of the items to be provided pursuant to the proposed transaction, and the anticipated use of the items.”

If the Obama Administration has already begun — or if it plans — to provide munitions to Syrian rebels, it is willing to arm terrorists. There are reports that indicate “half the rebels fighting to topple the Iranian-backed Syrian regime of President Bashar Assad are either diehard al-Qaida jihadists or hardline Islamists.” There are reports of horrible atrocities being carried out by the Syrian rebel groups with no regard to the Geneva Conventions. And there is evidence that people with different ideological leanings than the majority of the rebel faction are doomed to suffer if the opposition is victorious.

Obama has based his steadfast support of the Syrian rebels on reports that Assad has resorted to using chemical weapons to quell the uprising. According to The New York Times on Monday, a “United Nations report … confirmed that a deadly chemical arms attack caused a mass killing in Syria last month and for the first time provided extensive forensic details of the weapons used, which strongly implicated the Syrian government.”

But there is still some international skepticism, mainly from Russia, that the world can be 100 percent sure the Syrian government was responsible for the attacks.

“We want the events of the 21st of August to be impartially, objectively, professionally investigated,” Lavrov said Tuesday, noting that the Syrian regime’s claim that rebels launched the poison gas attack should not be dismissed.

The Obama Administration’s silence with regard to possible atrocities carried out at the hands of Syrian rebels and the lack of explanation about how the U.S. leadership plans to address the heavy extremist influence over the group it could possibly end up arming should be alarming to any observer. It should also highlight a bit of hypocrisy on the part of the Obama Administration.

For months, the President and top Administration officials have been pushing the United Nations’ Arms Trade Treaty on the American people, much to the annoyance of 2^nd Amendment supporters who see the treaty as a possible way to abrogate certain American gun rights.

In June, Secretary of State John Kerry said: “The Treaty is an important contribution to efforts to stem the illicit trade in conventional weapons, which fuels conflict, empowers violent extremists, and contributes to violations of human rights. The Treaty will require the parties to implement strict controls, of the kind the United States already has in place, on the international transfer of conventional arms to prevent their diversion and misuse and create greater international cooperation against black market arms merchants. The ATT will not undermine the legitimate international trade in conventional weapons, interfere with national sovereignty, or infringe on the rights of American citizens, including our Second Amendment rights.

“We look forward to signing it as soon as the process of conforming the official translations is completed satisfactorily,” Kerry’s statement continued.

Taken together, all this information leaves the average American with quite a head scratcher: If conservatives hadn’t been going to great pains in recent months to encourage lawmakers to stop the United States from signing the treaty out of fear for the 2^nd Amendment, would that very treaty hamstring the Nobel Peace Prize-winning President who advocated its signing from putting weapons directly into the hands of people who will use them to fuel conflict, empower violent extremists and contribute to violations of human rights?

Filed Under: Analysis, Conservative Politics, Liberty News, Staff Reports

http://personalliberty.com/2013/09/1...mical-weapons/