Thread: Joe Piscopo’s confessions of a disillusioned Democrat

Joe Piscopo’s confessions of a disillusioned Democrat

The party of the working class has sold out to fat cats


Comedian and actor Joe Piscopo throws out a ceremonial first pitch before an opening day baseball game between the Philadelphia Phillies and the Kansas City Royals, Friday, April 5, 2013, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Slocum) more >

By Joe Piscopo - - Thursday, August 14, 2014

I’m a Democrat. I’ve been a Democrat my entire life.

I used to utter those two sentences with pride and would shout them from the highest rooftops. Now, I’m almost embarrassed to say those words.

I almost can’t articulate my political affiliation in public (or on the radio) without immediately offering an apology and an explanation.

How did I get here?

I’ve been asking myself that question a lot lately. The more I ask it, the more I come to the realization that I haven’t changed all that much. Sure, I’m a little older … OK, a lot older. I have a few more children (one at every exit in New Jersey). I am also a little closer to collecting Social Security than I might’ve been a few years ago. However, in examining the current state of world affairs and the political landscape, the more I realize that the Democratic Party has changed far more than I have.

Illustration on Joe Piscopo shedding the Democrat party by Linas Garsys/The Washington ... more >

Contrary to popular belief, my first exposure to Democratic politicians wasn’t when I played Jimmy Carter in my first episode of “Saturday Night Live.” I’ve always been a political junkie and followed politics, the way my friends followed sports. My parents never told me where they were politically or where I should be. They encouraged an independent streak, a healthy skepticism of authority, coupled with a large dose of common sense and a love of country that was all-consuming.

My father was a proud Italian-American, but the American was second to no other nationality. “Pop” was a World War II veteran and a brilliant lawyer who devoted his professional life representing the working class, particularly new legal immigrants.

I was a Democrat because I believed in civil rights, like Lyndon Johnson. I was a Democrat because while it was clear to me that the Republican politicians were out of touch and cared for only the upper class, Democrats like Franklin Roosevelt cared for the masses and helping the working man. I was a Democrat because I believed in a strong defense and opposed communism, like John F.

Kennedy. And I was a Democrat because I loved the fact that Kennedy understood we needed lower marginal tax rates.

By and large, none of these values are represented in the Democratic Party today. From where I’m standing, the party has largely abandoned its commitment to civil rights and instead allows race-baiters to be national power brokers. As spokesman for the Boys and Girls Clubs of New Jersey, I am hurt that there is not one Democrat in Washington who cares enough about the great inner cities of this country to help those in dire distress from poverty and crime. These cities are in worse shape than those countries from which all those illegal “children” crossing our borders daily are coming.

In my home state, if I can walk the streets of Camden to try to help the disenfranchised, why can’t the Democrat in the White House walk the South Side of his hometown and do the same? In terms of caring for the working class, it seems as though Democrats are more interested in catering to the special interests, such as the trial lawyers, lobbyists and George Soros who fund their campaigns — rather than fighting for small-business relief to allow a higher minimum wage or (God forbid) middle-class tax relief.

Most disheartening, though, is the Democrats’ weak commitment to a strong defense and maintaining America’s place in the world as the only superpower. All I see is an American foreign policy led by a Democratic administration that is floundering when it comes to things like dealing with Iraq, Russia and Syria, inept when it comes to crises like Benghazi, and weak at the knees when it comes to protecting our strongest Middle Eastern ally, Israel.

I guess a big part of the reason I’m a Democrat has to do with who I am. I grew up idolizing the larger-than-life-personas I’ve encountered over the years in music, sports, movies and business. Which, of course, explains my fondness for “The Old Man,” as we affectionately called Frank Sinatra. I grew up believing that all of the rock-star personas were Democrats — no bigger star in the world than Kennedy. Lyndon Johnson had a Texas swagger that got things done, and Ed Koch could host “Saturday Night Live” as well as any other politician.

In politics today, where are today’s larger-than-life figures, ready to inspire the next generation of public servants to “ask not what your country can do for you …”?

When I met President Reagan, I felt inspired. I want to feel inspired again. Like Reagan, I think the time has come for me to leave the party I’ve been a member of my entire life — not because I want to leave it, but because it has already left me.
I don’t think I’m ready to become a Republican yet (although despite their lack of solutions, I still find myself rooting for the Republicans in the midterm elections for the first time I can recall).

In good conscience, however, I can’t continue to call myself a Democrat.


In becoming an independent, I think I’m maintaining the independent (dare I say, libertarian?) mindedness and patriotism that my parents endowed me with. For the country’s sake and for their own, I hope the Democrats wake up.


I am also hopeful that we, the people, will wake up and strongly feel, with heart and soul, what my family always instilled in me and what is sadly absent in many of today’s political leaders: the love, the appreciation and an unapologetic pride of being an American.
Joe Piscopo is an actor, comedian and host of “The Joe Piscopo Show” on AM 970 The Answer in New York.
Read more:


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz3ATNG0jZh
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

This sums me up pretty well as well. I don't fit the GOP mold myself. But I've found myself forced into supporting them as the DNC has gone off the complete deep end. The GOP's agenda is NOT good for America currently but the DNC's agenda will completely destroy the country and very quickly.

We really do need a 3rd party and need it fast. The catch is that 3rd party MUST leave religion at the door. Have your own views but what has killed much with the GOP and what has been hurting the TP is those who spew religion rheotoric. The honest truth is the majority of Americans in the middle who want a party have no interest in religion being a key part of it in any more. Same goes for many of the moderate Dems and many of the Reps are fine with *each to their own* these days.

Interesting article.
Has the Democratic Party become a socialist party?

Gerard Jackson
Monday 8 November 2010

A socialist state is defined as one in which the economy and much of one’s personal life is centrally planned, meaning that the rulers and their bureaucracy decide what is to be produced, which lines of production are to receive investment and which are not, how much is to be consumed and invested, etc. (Irrespective of what some socialists assert it is impossible to impose central planning without controlling the people.)
Socialism appears in basically two forms: formal and informal. The first one maintains the appearance of capitalism while all economic decision-making is in the hands of the state. In this form so-called capitalists are in reality agents of the government who are valued for their knowledge, expertise and experience. Nevertheless, their position in society is determined by how well they serve the state. (In Nazi Germany capitalists were renamed betriebsfuhrers.)

This type of socialism is called fascism. If this situation lasts long enough even the facade of capitalism state will disappear as the old capitalists die out — taking their expertise with them — and their places are taken by bureaucrats. The second kind can be called Soviet-style socialism in which state control of the economy is direct and there is no pretence at maintaining a capitalist order. As we can see, there is no fundamental economic difference between the ‘two’ structures. Ultimately, any basic difference will boil down to the degree with which one regime is more or less brutal than its competitor.

From the day he was born Obama has been surrounded by socialists. He admits that when he went to university he chose friends and lecturers on the basis of their leftwing ideology. This is not the mark of an enquiring minds, one that is introspective or questioning. He is the child of socialist thought and it is part of his DNA. Obama’s view of the world consists entirely of leftwing myths and reality be damned. It’s a world where capitalism is the criminal and not the saviour and where bloody Muslim conquests never happened. It is the world of a profoundly ignorant and politically bigoted man.

Although there is no way that a sudden Soviet-style takeover of the US economy could happen a fascist approach is all too possible. This is one where a piecemeal takeover occurs as the state gradually assumes control — using one crisis after another as an excuse — of vital sectors of the economy and appoints “czars” to a administer them.
Obama’s takeover of much of the car industry, his attacks on insurance companies, his plans to basically takeover the energy industry, his legislative effort to nationalise the health industry, etc., a reveal him to be a dogmatic leftist. But none of this would be possible without the support of Democrats.

In 2008 Democrat congressmen Maxine Waters and Maurice Hinchey¹revealed the extent of socialism thinking among congressional Democrats when they called for the nationalization of the oil companies.

According to the ideology of this socialist duo nationalization would give the state the power of controlling prices. In other words, they would repeal the economic law of supply and demand. The ‘thinking’ of these ignorant ideologues mirrors the words of S. G. Strumilin, a Stalinist ‘economist’, who declared:

Our task is not to study economics but to change it. We are bound by no laws

Even though socialism has been a social and economic disaster whenever it has been imposed² the likes of Waters and Hinchey still call for the socialisation of the US economy. And when they made this call not a single Democrat — including Obama — brought them to book on it. And why should they? This is the party that has blocked the building of refineries for more than 30 years. This is the same party that at this very moment is doing everything it can to prevent an increase in the domestic production of oil. It is the same party that has stymied nuclear power. And it is the party that Obama proudly boasted will cause “electricity prices [to] skyrocket”.

What is striking about the Democrats is the number of cultists it now attracts. One of the chief characteristic of a cult is its imperviousness to counterfactual evidence. Those who have joined the cult will simply refuse to believe any evidence that refutes its doctrine. (See L. Festenger, H. W. Riecken & S. Schachter, When Prophecy Fails, Harper Torchbooks, 1966). This behaviour fits Waters, Hinchey, Obama, Pelosi and their media toadies down to a ‘T’.

When forced to defend their nonsense — which doesn’t happen often enough — socialists rationalise the collapse of communism by either denying that the Soviet Union was a socialist state or that their socialist utopia will not repeat the planning mistakes of the Soviet Union. In other words, a socialist must be in a permanent state of denial. Waters and Maurice Hinchey are excellent examples of this observation.
Informed opinion understands that the collapse of communism fully revealed the contradictions, gross errors, tragedy and unimaginable waste that attempts at central planning created. These enormous losses and mistakes were not caused by planning errors, bureaucratic inefficiency, lack of enthusiasm or even ingenuity. They were caused by the sheer impossibility of the task.

In a seminal essay (Economic Calculation in a Socialist Commonwealth, 1920, Augustus M. Kelley Publishers 1975) Professor Ludwig von Misses explained why central economic planning (meaning socialism) would always fail. At the heart of his critique is his insight that without money prices it is impossible to allocate resources efficiently. The Result is economic chaos. His insights were extended by Professor von Hayek’s work³. The historic and economic case against central planning is now conclusive. (Also see David Ramsay Steele’sFrom Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation, Open Court, 1992).

A great many lessons of economics and history are forever being forgotten and then, after much misery, relearned. Regrettably, the tragic lesson that is central planning has evidently been rejected by the socialist likes Waters, Hinchey and Obama. Their absurd belief in the power of the state, i.e., politicians like themselves, to successfully do the work of the market would be comical if it were not tragic.

Driven by a powerful mixture of statist ideology, a staggering ignorance of economics and economic history, and abundant arrogance Obama’s ideological soul mates were probably licking their lips at the thought of being able to use the coercive power of the state to take over the oil companies, irrespective of the social, economic and political consequences.

(One would have to be particularly naïve to think that people like this would be easily satisfied. To them, nationalising the oil companies would be the first step in their inordinate vision of controlling the whole of the United States massive economy).

The arrogance of socialists is such that they believe they can successfully substitute ‘rational economic policies’ for the “anarchy of production” that is capitalism. In their opinion government insights, the needs of vested interests and bureaucratic direction will eliminate the market’s alleged failures and its “exploitation” of labour by capital. The result of their hubris is that the complex phenomenon that the market spontaneously, continuously and successfully deals with would be subordinated to the interests of the state, meaning themselves.

How many people — excluding that proportion of Democrats dumb enough to support Obama’s socialist agenda — really imagine that any bureaucrat, politician or academic could have created Silicon Valley? Entrepreneurs look to what can be. Planners look to what is. Hayek aptly called the belief in state planning the “fatal conceit”. The emphasis should be on fatal. Moreover, such a state would have to suppress criticism of its actions. The last thing socialists want is an informed citizenry. Needless to say, Obama and his allies are deeply hostile to free speech hence their efforts to silence critics by reintroducing the infamous “fairness doctrine”⁴ and continually demonising their critics.

Of course, when socialists argue about a “plan” they are really arguing about whose “plan”. As von Mises caustically observed, would-be economic planners are always arguing over whose plan is best. That a vital function of the market is to coordinate plans is something that never seems to occur to these one-size-fits-all ignoramuses who would wreck the US economy if given half a chance.

If the Democratic Party is not fully socialist, it doesn’t have far to go.

—————————————————

The following books are essential reading for those who are interest in learning how fascist economies operated.

Günter Reimann, The Vampire Economy: Doing Business Under Fascism, New York: Vanguard Press, 1939.
R. J. Overy, War and Economy in the Third Reich, Clarendon Press, 1995.
Adam Tooze, The Wages of Destruction, Penguin Books, 2006

¹Hinchey is a member of the socialist Progressive Caucus. Another power cult that thinks it can abolish economics and successfully impose a socialist state on Americans. Waters is a member of a number of socialist cults, one of which is the <a href=>Campaign for America’s Future</a>. Its co-director is Robert Borosage who was a pro-Soviet activist employed by the Institute of policy Studies during the Cold War. The IPS also hosted KGB officers.

² Countries like France or Sweden were never actually socialist. They were strongly interventionist states. Unfortunately many conservatives fail to distinguish between outright socialism and interventionism.

³Unfortunately Hayek muddied the waters somewhat by reducing the ‘planning problem’ to one of information. Mises stressed that what mattered is market money prices. These could only emerge when the institution of private property exists. From this it followed that socialist states do not have prices: they have price edicts.

⁴Naturally, the rules would not apply to the leftwing media.

http://brookesnews.com/has-the-democratic-party-become-a-socialist-party/

Joe Piscopo Leaves the Democrat Party

August 15, 2014 By Matthew Burke
26351 SHARES



“I can’t continue to call myself a Democrat,” actor and comedian Joe Piscopo, a lifelong Democrat wrote in on op-ed in the Washington Times on Thursday.

Piscopo talks about his past, growing up admiring the Democrat Party’s prior principles under iconic leaders like John F. Kennedy, but says that the values he admired in the party, and proudly supported, are no longer represented.

Piscopo, who volunteers his time as spokesman for the Boys and Girls Clubs of New Jersey, said there isn’t one Democrat in Washington who cares about the plight of the poverty in large U.S. cities, and that the conditions in inner cities is worse than the conditions illegal aliens are fleeing, and the party that once stood for the little guy has been corrupted by “trial lawyers, lobbyists and George Soros.”

“In my home state, if I can walk the streets of Camden to try to help the disenfranchised, why can’t the Democrat in the White House walk the South Side of his hometown and do the same? In terms of caring for the working class, it seems as though Democrats are more interested in catering to the special interests, such as the trial lawyers, lobbyists and George Soros who fund their campaigns — rather than fighting for small-business relief to allow a higher minimum wage or (God forbid) middle-class tax relief.”

Piscopo explains another reason he’s leaving the Democrat Party, an area he finds “most disheartening,” is the “Democrats’ weak commitment to strong defense and maintaining America’s place in the world,” calling the current administration “inept when it comes to crises like Benhgazi, and weak at the knees when it comes to protecting our strongest Middle Eastern ally, Israel.

Piscopo asked where the “larger-than-life figures” have disappeared to, the people who inspired the next generation, writing that the Democrat Party has left him and he regrets having to make his decision to cut ties.

“When I met President Reagan, I felt inspired. I want to feel inspired again. Like Reagan, I think the time has come for me to leave the party I’ve been a member of my entire life — not because I want to leave it, but because it has already left me.”

While Piscopo states that he’s not quite ready (“yet”) to become a Republican, he does admit rooting for them in the midterm elections for the first time in his life.

“I can’t continue to call myself a Democrat,” Piscopo announced.

Please LIKE and SHARE on Facebook and Twitter if you think more in Hollywood should follow Piscopo’s lead and leave the Democrat Party.

26351 SHARES

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/08/15/joe-p...emocrat-party/

Mark Levin

Good for you, Joe

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...oned-democrat/

http://www.alipac.us/f19/angelina-jo...6/#post1431212

http://www.alipac.us/f19/%91they%92r...3/#post1431213

http://www.alipac.us/f19/howard-ster...unists-306924/

Originally Posted by Newmexican

As spokesman for the Boys and Girls Clubs of New Jersey, I am hurt that there is not one Democrat in Washington who cares enough about the great inner cities of this country to help those in dire distress from poverty and crime. These cities are in worse shape than those countries from which all those illegal “children” crossing our borders daily are coming.

Too bad that the mainstream media can't seem to see the devastation of some of our inner cities and the confusion and despair which permeates them.

We really have to put our own people to work rebuiding their neighborhoods and their cities and towns.
**********************************
Americans first in this magnificent country

American jobs for American workers

Fair trade, not free trade