Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    N.Y. US Judge Suspends Deportation of Gay Spouse

    US Immigration Judge Suspends Deportation of Gay Spouse

    Michael Bowman, Voice of America | Washington
    March 27, 2011

    For the first time, a U.S. judge has suspended the deportation of the foreign-born same-sex spouse of an American citizen. Last week’s action by an immigration judge in New York comes amid ongoing challenges to the constitutionality of a law banning the federal government from recognizing marriages between homosexuals.

    Last year, Cristina Ojeda of Queens, New York, married her partner of three years, Argentine-born Monica Alcota, in nearby Connecticut, one of only a handful of states that allow civil marriage for gay people. But Alcota has been living under the threat of deportation for years, having overstayed a tourist visa that expired 10 years ago.

    Last week (3/22/11), Alcota stood before an immigration judge fearing deportation to Argentina. But the judge halted deportation proceedings to give her and Ojeda time to petition for federal recognition of their marriage.

    Ojeda spoke with VOA a day later, saying, "We were happy. It gives us more hope."

    Among the more common ways for non-citizens to gain legal residency in the United States is by marrying a U.S. citizen. But that avenue is blocked for tens of thousands of bi-national gay couples. Most states refuse to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples, and federal law bans recognition of same-sex marriage.

    Ojeda recalls the pain of seeing her spouse taken into federal custody and placed in detention for three months prior to the deportation hearing. "Oh God, it has been horrible. I have never gone through anything this painful, having Monica being taken away from me on the bus. I had to hug her, and they took her," she said.

    Attorney Lavi Soloway represents Alcota and Ojeda. "Monica and Cristina represent the ultimate consequence of discrimination against lesbian and gay couples who, although they are legally married, are denied recognition of their marriage by the federal government for all purposes, including immigration. Cristina is no different than any other U.S. citizen. She is in a loving, committed relationship with her spouse," he said.

    Enacted in 1996, the Defense of Marriage Act stipulates that only opposite-sex marriages are valid under federal law. During the past year, federal courts have ruled core elements of the Act unconstitutional. Those cases are being appealed and could ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Weeks ago, the Obama administration announced it would no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act’s constitutionality, leaving it to congressionally-appointed attorneys to argue for its retention. Earlier this month, bills to repeal the law were introduced in both houses of Congress.

    California Western Law School Professor Ari Waldman has written extensively on the legal battles surrounding the Defense of Marriage Act. He says suspending deportation is well within an immigration judge’s power, as Judge Terry Bain did for Monica Alcota. "That the constitutionality of DOMA is, at best, uncertain, must have suggested to Judge Bain that a law that is of dubious constitutionality should not be the basis for splitting up a committed couple," he said.

    VOA contacted several pro-DOMA advocacy groups. None were willing to comment on the Alcota-Ojeda case, but all are steadfast in their conviction the institution of marriage should be reserved for heterosexuals, and that allowing gays to marry will weaken the institution and corrode the family unit, what they call the building block of civilization.

    Attorney Lavi Soloway sees the issue differently. "It really is a question of discrimination. And I have not yet heard a cogent argument for justifying discrimination against couples like Cristina and Monica. The United States has a long history of battling to perfect the ideal that all people have equality under the law. And what Monica and Cristina achieved is one small incremental step towards further perfecting that ideal," he said.

    Law Professor Waldman says Judge Bain’s decision sets no binding precedent for other immigration cases involving bi-national married gay couples. But he expects other judges will take note of the Alcota-Ojeda case and concur that similar deportations should be suspended until the Defense of Marriage Act’s constitutionality is definitively determined, or until the law is repealed, as President Barack Obama has advocated.

    http://www.voanews.com/english/news/usa ... 41179.html
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Oregon, Just north of mexifornia
    Posts
    355
    Ojeda spoke with VOA a day later, saying, "We were happy. It gives us more hope."
    I do not want them to have ANY hope.

    I want any and all illegal aliens to realize that their continued presence here is a hopeless situation.

    Enough talk about dreams, licenses and amnesty.
    Illegal, or unlawful, is used to describe something that is prohibited or not authorized by law

  3. #3
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    I don't understand why her deportation was halted. Argentina is very gay-friendly and recently passed a gay marriage law. http://www.politicolnews.com/argentina- ... riage-law/

    They can't claim she will be persecute if deported back there. Others have had their spouses deported, why is she given special treatment? Her American spouse can always move to Argentina with her. They will be very happy there.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  4. #4
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072
    Enacted in 1996, the Defense of Marriage Act stipulates that only opposite-sex marriages are valid under federal law. ...

    Weeks ago, the Obama administration announced it would no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act’s constitutionality
    Obama and Holder strike again. Liberalizing the law with policy.

    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member Mickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by miguelina
    I don't understand why her deportation was halted. Argentina is very gay-friendly and recently passed a gay marriage law. http://www.politicolnews.com/argentina- ... riage-law/

    They can't claim she will be persecute if deported back there. Others have had their spouses deported, why is she given special treatment? Her American spouse can always move to Argentina with her. They will be very happy there.
    You're right, I don't understand it either. Illegal is illegal, I don't care if it's Obama's aunt, the spouse of a citizen, or one of Pelosi's illegal alien vinyard workers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •