Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member American-ized's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Monroe County, New York
    Posts
    3,530

    68% Say Those Who Employ Illegal Immigrants Should Be Punish

    68% Say Those Who Employ Illegal Immigrants Should Be Punished

    Wednesday, March 18, 2009

    Sixty-eight percent (68%) of U.S. voters favor strict government sanctions on employers who hire illegal immigrants, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. That’s up slightly from a couple of years ago.

    Only 22% say the employers should not be penalized, and 10% are not sure.

    Voters are more divided on whether to punish landlords who rent or sell property to illegal immigrants--48% support sanctions on landlords while 36% are opposed.

    (Want a free daily e-mail update? Sign up now. If it's in the news, it's in our polls.) Rasmussen Reports updates also available on Twitter.

    Polling released yesterday showed strong support for having police officers check the immigration status of those pulled over for a traffic violation. But most voters are at least somewhat concerned that efforts to identify and deport illegal immigrants also will end up violating the civil rights of some U.S. citizens.

    On the employment front, Congress last week did not reauthorize the federal E-Verify program which allows employers to check on the immigration status of prospective employees. Use of E-Verify has been voluntary because efforts by the Bush Administration to make it mandatory have been opposed in court by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Associated Builders and Contractors and others.

    The Obama administration wants to review the program before deciding whether to endorse it.

    Seventy-seven percent (77%) of Republicans support strict sanctions on employers who hire illegal immigrants, as do 58% of Democrats and 72% of those not affiliated with either major party.

    Seventy-six percent (76%) of white voters think strict sanctions should be imposed on employers who hire illegals, but African-Americans are evenly divided.

    When it comes to landlord sanctions, 62% of GOP voters favor them, while nearly half of Democrats (48%) are opposed.

    Among unaffiliated voters, 49% favor landlord sanctions, while 29% are opposed.

    Most voters (74%) say the federal government is not doing enough to secure the nation’s borders.

    The flow of illegal immigrants across the U.S.-Mexico border has slowed with the bad economy, and now more voters are concerned about the spread of drug-related violence from Mexico than about illegal immigration.

    Please sign up for the Rasmussen Reports daily e-mail update (it’s free)… let us keep you up to date with the latest public opinion news.

    See survey questions and toplines. Crosstabs are available to Premium Members only.

    Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.

    The Rasmussen Reports ElectionEdgeâ„¢ Premium Service for Election 2008 offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a Presidential election.

    Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... e_punished

  2. #2
    Senior Member ReggieMay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,527
    Sixty-eight percent (68%) of U.S. voters favor strict government sanctions on employers who hire illegal immigrants, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.
    And yet Obama plans to draw resources away from internal enforcement and divert the funds to preventing U.S. guns from going into Mexico.
    "A Nation of sheep will beget a government of Wolves" -Edward R. Murrow

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member crazybird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Joliet, Il
    Posts
    10,175
    And yet Obama plans to draw resources away from internal enforcement and divert the funds to preventing U.S. guns from going into Mexico.
    Everything but address the issue. They didn't want them doing anything at the border because it was just poor tomatoe pickers looking for work. It explodes in-land and people finally get some enforcement, so now lets head back to the border and look for American guns. Heck, I'm surprised he didn't go so far as to send them to the Canadian border...that would fix it. LOL
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member Bowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    North Mexico aka Aztlan
    Posts
    7,055
    Quote Originally Posted by ReggieMay

    And yet Obama plans to draw resources away from internal enforcement and divert the funds to preventing U.S. guns from going into Mexico.
    American guns are not the problem in Mexico, it's weapons including 50 cal machine guns and rocket launchers from Packistan, Russia, you name it being smuggled into Mexico. Which I guess explains why Obama focuses on the "non-problem".
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •