Thread: Acitivism Idea - Amnesty and Vaccine Hesitancy. #boycotttheshot

Boycott the Shot!!!!! hashtag: #boycotttheshot

If amnesty is passed I will never take the shot. It is a boycott of the makers and supporters of the vaccine who support amnesty. There is a group called fwd.us that supports "an earned pathway to citizenship for the roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S." https://www.fwd.us/immigration/pathway/

One of the founders is Bill Gates who has been one of the leaders in pushing the covid vaccine worldwide.
https://www.fwd.us/founders/

Another group called New American Economy is also "committed to the fight for comprehensive immigration reform — including a full path to citizenship for the 11 million undocumented".
https://www.newamericaneconomy.org/2...ration-system/

One of their members includes William C. Weldon, Former Chairman of Johnson & Johnson, one of the makers of the vaccines.
http://www.newamericaneconomy.org/wp...rship_List.pdf

So if they are going to hurt this country and potentially destroy it by supporting amnesty then I am going financially hurt them by starting a movement to "Boycott The Shot!" hashtag: #BoycottTheShot

For those on the left and the elite who want to accuse me of deliberately putting people in danger by boycotting the shot, my response is "Shut Up". As far as I am concerned I think that both amnesty and vaccinations are driven by greed, that the shot is unsafe and ineffective and that amnesty is harmful and a potential existential threat to the country.

For those who are skeptical that amnesty could cause a mistrust of vaccines, here is something for the left and the elite to consider. Recently on CNN, Dr. Reed Tuckson, a founding member of the Black Coalition Against COVID-19 said this: "We have to overcome the distrust, the historical and contemporary distrust that people of color have with the government, with elites, with the medical care system. These seeds of distrust have been sown in our culture for generation after generation. But, unfortunately, they are watered every day, so that, when people of color see the active engagement of voter disenfranchisement, when we see the elements of unfairness in our criminal justice system, all of those things bleed over into health care and into the decisions that people make about vaccines."
https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/amp...-30/segment/01

Did it ever occur to these politicians, especially leftists and Democrats that amnesty might be a reason for Trump supporters to distrust the vaccines?

Two Democrat senators have said that partisan legislation can create distrust in government.

Senator Kyrsten Sinema said her "support for retaining the 60-vote threshold is not based on the importance of any particular policy. It is based on what is best for our democracy. ... This question is less about the immediate results from any of these Democratic or Republican goals — it is the likelihood of ... deepening divisions and further eroding Americans’ confidence in our government."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...he-people-act/

Senator Joe Manchin said, "partisan policymaking won’t instill confidence in our democracy — it will destroy it."
https://www.wvgazettemail.com/opinio...2d0af870f.html
https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsr...the-people-act

And what are the Democrats doing right now.

"Congressional Democrats and immigration advocates are staring at their best chance in years to overcome Republican opposition and give millions of people in the U.S. without legal authorization a way to become citizens.
Their goal is to stuff the language into a huge measure this fall financing many of President Joe Biden’s priorities that would be shielded from a Republican Senate filibuster. That bill-killing procedure requires a virtually impossible 60 votes to overcome, but erasing that danger with a Democrat in the White House means they could score an immigration triumph by themselves".
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden...9ab097bb168660

You have illegal aliens pouring across an open border with covid and the Democratic Party is trying to pass a partisan reconciliation bill that "could ultimately regularize the status of up to 10 million people" and "would mark the first time in 35 years that Congress dictates a liberalization of immigration policy after decades of increasing border security and immigration enforcement."
https://thehill.com/latino/563047-ma...in-budget-deal

So how did Senators Sinema and Manchin vote on the budget resolution?

Sinema and Manchin voted against an amendment by Senator Grassley to prohibit "illegal aliens with criminal records from receiving conditional or lawful permanent resident status in the United States."
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/L...n=1&vote=00353

Sinema and Manchin voted against an amendment by Senator Cruz to expel "illegal immigrants who may contribute to the spread of COVID-19, including any of the dangerous variants originating overseas, in order to protect the public health of the American People, save American lives, and assist in eradicating the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States."
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/L...n=1&vote=00344

When Senators like Manchin and Sinema claim to be bipartisan and vote partisan on an amendment to expel illegal aliens with covid, that makes me think that the government can't be trusted on covid or the vaccines.

Sinema and Manchin who claim to be bipartisan, even voted against an amendment, that passed with bipartisan support, by Senator Hagerty to provide "sufficient resources to detain and deport a higher number of illegal aliens who have been convicted of a crime."
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/L...n=1&vote=00351

An important note to keep in mind is that 3 of the Democrat Senators who voted for the amendment to provide "sufficient resources to detain and deport a higher number of illegal aliens who have been convicted of a crime", Senator Shaheen of New Hampshire, Senator Kelly of Arizona, and Senator Cortez Masto of Nevada, are up for re-election in 2022 and polling shows that supporting amnesty in the reconciliation bill "could be a career killer for several Democrats up for reelection next year."
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/immi...213300278.html

So they probably voted for the amendment out of fear of being voted out in 2022.

And of course all of this effort to ram through amnesty will only encourage more people to come illegally.

It will encourage people to come illegally from Mexico. A Center for Immigration Studies article at https://cis.org/Public-Opinion-Mexico-US-Immigration mentioned a Zogby poll of Mexicans which said that a "clear majority of people in Mexico, 56 percent, thought giving legal status to illegal immigrants in the United States would make it more likely that people they know would go to the United States illegally" and of "Mexicans with a member of their immediate household in the United States, 65 percent said a legalization program would make people they know more likely to go to America illegally." The poll also stated that increased immigration enforcement was one of the reasons "fewer people were going to America as illegal immigrants and more were coming back to Mexico."

It will also encourage people to come illegally from the rest of Latin America. According to a Gallup poll of Latin America, "42 million -- said they want to go to the United States. ... Seekers of citizenship or asylum are watching to determine exactly when and how is the best time to make their move." https://news.gallup.com/opinion/chai...n-migrate.aspx

And it will even encourage people to come illegally from all across the globe. "In the remote Darien region of Eastern Panama, migrants and asylum seekers from around the world arrived ... Migrants from Africa, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Cuba, and Haiti converge here, all trying to get to the U.S."
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/ho...dly-darien-gap

And they are coming because "a lot of asylum seekers right now are hopeful is that, with the new administration of Joe Biden, that there may be a lot of dramatic changes that could allow them to settle into a life more quickly and easily in the United States."
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/th...er-in-brooklyn

So you have people coming across our border illegally from all across the globe who may have covid. If the government was truly concerned about covid they would cracking down on illegal immigration as a way to deter the illegal entry of people into the country who might have covid.

The way I see it, just as amnesty is driven by greed for cheap labor for multinational corporations, the push for vaccinations is being driven by greed for revenue for the pharmaceutical industry. Why should I trust politicians on the safety of the covid vaccine while they simultaneously stab me and the country in the back with amnesty? So by supporting amnesty they are increasing the very vaccine hesitancy they claim they are trying to overcome because they are showing that they cannot be trusted on anything including covid.

Just look at the politicians who are breaking their promises and selling out on amnesty.

Recently, when asked about putting immigration reform in the reconciliation bill, Manchin said "I heard it is in there ... I'm fine. I am a 2013 immigration supporter so you can look at the 2013 bill. I thought that was a great bill then. I thought if we had that bill then we wouldn't have all the problems we have today."
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/15/p...ons/index.html

If he is voting for a reconciliation bill that includes “immigration reform” he is breaking a number of promises that he made to the people of West Virginia.

1. Manchin said the following: “We should all be alarmed at how the budget reconciliation process is being used by both parties to stifle debate around the major issues facing our country today. … If the filibuster is eliminated or budget reconciliation becomes the norm, a new and dangerous precedent will be set to pass sweeping, partisan legislation that changes the direction of our nation every time there is a change in political control. The consequences will be profound — our nation may never see stable governing again. … Instead of fixating on eliminating the filibuster or shortcutting the legislative process through budget reconciliation, it is time we do our jobs.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...b78_story.html
If he supports immigration reform in the budget reconciliation bill, this is broken promise #1.

2. Manchin said that “congressional action … must be the result of both Democrats and Republicans coming together to find a pathway forward or we risk further dividing and destroying the republic we swore to protect and defend as elected officials” and “to seek bipartisan compromise no matter how difficult and to develop the political bonds that end divisions and help unite the country we love.”
https://www.wvgazettemail.com/opinio...2d0af870f.html
https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsr...the-people-act
He also said that the “time has come to end these political games, and to usher a new era of bipartisanship where we find common ground on the major policy debates facing our nation.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...b78_story.html
If he supports immigration reform in the partisan budget reconciliation bill, this is broken promise #2.

3. Manchin said that when “Americans vote to send their two senators to Washington, they trust that they will work to represent the interests of their state on equal footing with 98 other senators.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...b78_story.html
Manchin also said that “as long as I have the privilege of being your U.S. senator, I will fight to represent the people of West Virginia”.
https://www.wvgazettemail.com/opinio...2d0af870f.html
https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsr...the-people-act

But in West Virginia which is one the most pro-Trump states in the country, people oppose amnesty.

A Zogby poll said that if Manchin "moves to include immigration for millions of illegal immigrants in an infrastructure bill, new polling shows it could be a career killer ... with 55% less likely' to support him and 29% 'more likely.'"
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/immi...213300278.html

The Zogby poll also found that “52% of voters oppose of including an amnesty for illegal aliens in a bill to fund infrastructure upgrades. Only 34% would support such an effort. ... 52% of voters agree that granting 'amnesty, or a pathway to citizenship, to millions of illegal immigrants already in the United States' would exacerbate the current immigration and border crisis. 59% of West Virginia voters hold the Biden administration and its policies responsible for the current immigration and border crisis. 70% believe that the 'situation at the border represents a humanitarian, health, and national security crisis for the United States and steps must be taken to end it.'”
https://www.fairus.org/press-release...pposes-amnesty
So if Manchin supports immigration reform in the budget reconciliation bill, this is broken promise #3.

This would make Joe Manchin another "Dirty Democrat" hashtag: #DirtyDemocrat
You could also call him "Joe The Ho Manchin" hashtag: #JoeTheHoManchin

Sinema has said that her “support for retaining the 60-vote threshold is not based on the importance of any particular policy. It is based on what is best for our democracy. ... I do not accept a new standard by which important legislation can only pass on party-line votes”.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...he-people-act/

So if "Democrats are turning their last hopes for immigration reform to an infrastructure bill and a complicated budget plan that has never before been tested ... and forcing the legislation through a partisan process like reconciliation"
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/15/p...ons/index.html then Sinema should refuse to support it.

Senator Sinema also said that the "minimum wage provision is not appropriate for the reconciliation process. It is not a budget item. And it shouldn’t be in there."
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...mocrats-468768

And "immigration reform" isn't a "budget item" either unless you're a power hungry Democrat who considers illegal aliens to be the equivalent of cash to buy votes for Democrats.

If she votes for Sanders partisan budget resolution for amnesty she will be breaking her promise of protecting the filibuster by passing important legislation through a party-line vote through a new standard of reconciliation.

Then there's Bernie Sanders who always portrays himself as a champion of the poor against the rich and the "top 1%".

Harvard economist George Borjas says that immigration "induces a substantial redistribution of wealth, away from workers who compete with immigrants and toward employers and other users of immigrant services. Workers lose because immigrants drag wages down. Employers gain because immigrants drag wages down. These wealth transfers may be in the tens of billions of dollars per year."
https://cis.org/Report/Top-Ten-Symptoms-Immigration

Black civil rights leader and Democrat Barbara Jordan also agreed with George Borjas. Barbara Jordan recommended "the elimination of the admission of unskilled workers."
https://www.numbersusa.com/sites/def..._June%2028.pdf

Barbara Jordan also said that there is "no national interest in continuing to import lesser-skilled and unskilled workers to compete in the most vulnerable parts of our labor force. Many American workers do not have adequate job prospects. We should make their task easier to find employment, not harder."
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...ration-legacy/

Bernie Sanders agreed with George Borjas and Barbara Jordan. Here is what he said back in 2015: “Open borders? No, that's a Koch brothers proposal. ... It would make everybody in America poorer ... What right-wing people in this country would love is an open-border policy. Bring in all kinds of people, work for $2 or $3 an hour, that would be great for them. I don't believe in that. I think we have to raise wages in this country, I think we have to do everything we can to create millions of jobs.”
https://www.vox.com/2015/7/28/901449...x-conversation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf-k6qOfXz0

But as people are pouring across the border illegally, Bernie Sanders drafted the budget resolution "creating multiyear pathways to legal permanent residency, and potentially citizenship, for four groups of immigrants without legal status."
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden...9ab097bb168660

So Bernie Sanders admits immigration drive down wages and then sponsors the budget resolution that stuffs amnesty into the reconciliation bill. So who is included in Bernie Sanders amnesty plan?

According to the Hill the "proposal, as currently funded, would include undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as minors, beneficiaries of the Temporary Protected Status program, essential workers and immigrant farmworkers."
https://thehill.com/latino/563047-ma...in-budget-deal

So who else is supporting amnesty for those same groups? In a letter that was written by the Bush Institute and 20+ organizations, they wrote that they support the "efforts in Congress to advance the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, create a permanent pathway to citizenship for Dreamers, and allow those on Temporary Protected Status to apply for green cards." They also mention "essential workers" and wrote that "undocumented immigrants who already live in the U.S.—should have an opportunity to earn legal status or citizenship."
https://www.bushcenter.org/publicati...and-house.html
https://www.bushcenter.org/about-the...on-system.html

So the George W. Bush Institute and Bernie Sanders support giving amnesty to the same groups of people. One of the organizations that "distributed a joint letter calling upon our nation's policymakers to reform the whole of the American immigration system" is the "Americans for Prosperity".
https://www.bushcenter.org/about-the...on-system.html

So who created and funds the Americans for Prosperity? Americans for Prosperity was "founded by the Koch brothers in 2004".
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...ization-479148

"David Koch’s charitable giving has included $58 million donated to nonprofits that could include groups such as Americans for Prosperity".
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/koch-brothers

George W. Bush also admitted the role of the Koch Brothers in his effort to support amnesty. In an interview with Hugh Hewitt he said, "So the Bush Center is spearheading a reform movement. It’s quiet except for this book, which makes it not quiet. But it’s, we’re lining up. And you know, we’re talking to people about, you know, what needs to be done. I mean, the Koch Brothers, for example, I know that’s a word that scares a lot of people on the left, but they’re very much in favor of a rational immigration policy. And they’re putting money behind it, and they’re pushing hard. And so we’re very much involved with what you said."
https://hughhewitt.com/president-geo...ration-debate/

So Bernie Sanders admits that immigration drives down wages and supports giving the same groups of immigrants amnesty that his nemesis, the Koch Brothers, do.

There's more evidence against Bernie Sanders. There's another group called Fwd.us that supports giving a "pathway to citizenship for the roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S."
https://www.fwd.us/immigration/pathway/

So who is part of Fwd.us? Two of the founders are Bill Gates, Founder and Technology Advisor, Microsoft, and Mark Zuckerberg, Founder & CEO, Facebook.
https://www.fwd.us/founders/

Major Contributors to Fwd.us also include Brad Smith, President & Chief Legal Officer, Microsoft, Chris Cox Chief Product Officer, Facebook, and Greg Penner, Chairman, Walmart
https://www.fwd.us/founders/

Why does this matter? Because those three contributors just happened to be three of the biggest contributors to Bernie Sanders 2020 Presidential Campaign. Microsoft gave $430,804, Walmart gave $271,790, and Facebook gave $240,915.
https://www.opensecrets.org/2020-pre...s?id=N00000528

I guess Bernie Sanders should be known from now on as "Sellout Sanders" hashtag:#SelloutSanders

But Bernie Sanders isn't the only "political prostitute". What about Joe Manchin? Two of the biggest contributors to Manchin's 2018 Senate campaign include Goldman Sachs which gave $56,000 and Paul, Weiss et al which gave $27,500.
https://www.opensecrets.org/races/co...id=WVS1&spec=N

So why do those donors matter? Goldman Sachs and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP belong to a group called the New American Economy.
http://www.newamericaneconomy.org/wp...rship_List.pdf

The New American Economy is another group "committed to the fight for comprehensive immigration reform — including a full path to citizenship for the 11 million undocumented".
https://www.newamericaneconomy.org/2...ration-system/

So like Bernie Sanders, two of Manchin's biggest contributors Goldman Sachs and Paul, Weiss et al support amnesty. And why is Goldman Sachs, an international bank giving money to a West Virginia Senator? Seems to me that by supporting amnesty in the reconciliation bill Joe Manchin is representing Goldman Sachs instead of the people of West Virginia.

Seems to me that #SelloutSanders has a sidekick "Joe the Ho Manchin" hashtag:#JoeTheHoManchin.

So this is part of what Biden's phrase "Build Back Better" really means. Build Back Better for multinational corporations, the elite, and illegal aliens and not for the American people.

Senator Sinema said, "I do not support a bill that costs $3.5 trillion"
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...ocial-n1275330

Manchin has also expressed concern over the 3.5 trillion dollar price tag of bill. “'We are going to have to pay for all this,' Manchin said, adding that he also is concerned about government debt and the risk of inflation."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...t-yet-on-board

But if amnesty is part of the reconciliation bill, it will probably cost a lot more than 3.5 trillion.
A CNN article at https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/04/new...are/index.html says that "as many as 71 percent of undocumented adults do not have insurance."

An article in the Federalist at http://thefederalist.com/2015/08/26/...-of-deception/ said that "'71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children make use of at least one major welfare program.' That number jumps to 79 percent in illegal households from Mexico. By comparison, only 38.7 percent of households headed by U.S. citizens use at least one major welfare program."

Obama admitted this. In his book, "The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream" on page 263 at https://books.google.com/books?id=k85pcYttpW0C&pg=PA263 Obama wrote that illegal immigration "threatens to depress further the wages of blue-collar Americans and put strains on an already overburdened safety net."

But amnesty will also make illegal immigration worse.

It will increase illegal immigration from Mexico. A Center for Immigration Studies article at http://cis.org/ZogbyPoll-EffectsOfAmnesty mentioned a Zogby poll of Mexicans which said that a "clear majority of people in Mexico, 56 percent, thought giving legal status to illegal immigrants in the United States would make it more likely that people they know would go to the United States illegally" and of "Mexicans with a member of their immediate household in the United States, 65 percent said a legalization program would make people they know more likely to go to America illegally." The poll also stated that increased immigration enforcement was one of the reasons "fewer people were going to America as illegal immigrants and more were coming back to Mexico."

It will increase illegal immigration from the rest of Latin America. According to a Gallup poll "42 million -- said they want to go to the United States. ... Seekers of citizenship or asylum are watching to determine exactly when and how is the best time to make their move."
https://news.gallup.com/opinion/chai...n-migrate.aspx

And it will even encourage people to come illegally from all across the globe. "In the remote Darien region of Eastern Panama, migrants and asylum seekers from around the world arrived ... Migrants from Africa, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Cuba, and Haiti converge here, all trying to get to the U.S."
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/ho...dly-darien-gap

And they are coming because "a lot of asylum seekers right now are hopeful is that, with the new administration of Joe Biden, that there may be a lot of dramatic changes that could allow them to settle into a life more quickly and easily in the United States."
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/th...er-in-brooklyn

In a story on PBS Newshour at https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy...ees-in-america economist Jeffrey Sachs said that if "borders were simply opened and anybody could go where they want, ... hundreds of millions of people would be on the move and would overwhelm budgets and social services".

So if amnesty is included in the reconciliation bill, the cost will probably be a lot higher than 3.5 trillion.

But the threat posed by amnesty is much larger than the fiscal strain on the safety nets or the economic harm caused by falling wages. This is in response to the argument of those who feel compassion for the illegal aliens who are fleeing violence or are looking for a better life economically.

For those who think that America can handle it as a humanitarian challenge because we are the most powerful nation in the world or that we are nation of immigrants. Think again.

According to the Roman Historian, Ammianus, in 376 "a barbarian host composed of different distant nations, which had suddenly been driven by force from their own country ... begged that the people thus driven from their homes and now encamped on the other side of the river, might be kindly received by us, the affair seemed a cause of joy rather than of fear, according to the skilful flatterers who were always extolling and exaggerating the good fortune of the emperor; congratulating him that an embassy had come from the furthest corners of the earth unexpectedly, offering him a large body of recruits ; and that, by combining the strength of his own nation with these foreign forces, he would have an army absolutely invincible; ... Full of this hope he sent forth several officers to
bring this ferocious people and their waggons into our territory. And such great pains were taken to gratify this nation which was destined to overthrow the empire of Rome, that not one was left behind, not even of those who were stricken with mortal disease. ... In this way, through the turbulent zeal of violent people, the ruin of the Roman empire was brought on. This, at all events, is neither obscure nor uncertain, that the unhappy officers who were intrusted with the charge of
conducting the multitude of the barbarians across the river, though they repeatedly endeavoured to calculate their
numbers, at last abandoned the attempt as hopeless : and the man who would wish to ascertain the number might
as well (as the most illustrious of poets ' says) attempt to count the waves in the African sea, or the grains of sand
tossed about by the zephyr."
https://books.google.com/books?id=hh8NAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA585
https://books.google.com/books?id=hh8NAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA586

So there you have it. Giving asylum to large numbers of immigrants and open borders destroyed the Roman Empire. The destruction of Rome by immigration was also referred to by Alexander Hamilton, who was himself an immigrant.

Founding Father, Alexander Hamilton wrote that "it is known, that hardly any thing contributed more to the downfall of Rome, than her precipitate communication of the privileges of citizenship to the inhabitants of Italy at large."
https://books.google.com/books?id=hm0FAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA774

What Emperor Valens did looks exactly like what we are experiencing right now because amnesty only encourages illegal immigration.

It will encourage more Mexicans to come illegally. A Center for Immigration Studies article at http://cis.org/ZogbyPoll-EffectsOfAmnesty mentioned a Zogby poll of Mexicans which said that a "clear majority of people in Mexico, 56 percent, thought giving legal status to illegal immigrants in the United States would make it more likely that people they know would go to the United States illegally" and of "Mexicans with a member of their immediate household in the United States, 65 percent said a legalization program would make people they know more likely to go to America illegally." The poll also stated that increased immigration enforcement was one of the reasons "fewer people were going to America as illegal immigrants and more were coming back to Mexico."

It will encourage people to come illegally from all over Latin America. According to a Gallup poll of Latin America, "42 million -- said they want to go to the United States. ... Seekers of citizenship or asylum are watching to determine exactly when and how is the best time to make their move." https://news.gallup.com/opinion/chai...n-migrate.aspx

And it will even encourage people to come illegally from all across the globe. "In the remote Darien region of Eastern Panama, migrants and asylum seekers from around the world arrived ... Migrants from Africa, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Cuba, and Haiti converge here, all trying to get to the U.S."
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/ho...dly-darien-gap

And they are coming because "a lot of asylum seekers right now are hopeful is that, with the new administration of Joe Biden, that there may be a lot of dramatic changes that could allow them to settle into a life more quickly and easily in the United States."
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/th...er-in-brooklyn

So if Democrats pass amnesty through this reconcilation bill I will consider it an act of treason and I will see them as American versions of Emperor Valens who killed their own country.

And for what? Who benefits from risking the entire destruction of the country?

Multinational corporations that benefit from cheaper labor.

This includes FWD.us and its "group of business and tech leaders"
https://www.fwd.us/founders/

This also includes an organization called New American Economy and its corporate leaders.
http://www.newamericaneconomy.org/wp...rship_List.pdf

And lastly, it includes the Koch Brothers. As George W. Bush said, "I mean, the Koch Brothers, for example, I know that’s a word that scares a lot of people on the left, but they’re very much in favor of a rational immigration policy. And they’re putting money behind it, and they’re pushing hard. And so we’re very much involved with what you said."
https://hughhewitt.com/president-geo...ration-debate/

The other beneficiary is the Democratic Party.

In 2018, Center For American Progress (CAP) Action Fund circulated a memo which said that the “fight to protect Dreamers is ... a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success” and that if “Democrats don’t try to do everything in their power to defend Dreamers, that will jeopardize Democrats’ electoral chances in 2018 and beyond. In short, the next few weeks will tell us a lot about the Democratic Party and its long-term electoral prospects.”
https://cdn.americanprogressaction.o...OnDreamers.pdf
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/08/le...toral-success/

But this reconciliation bill would benefit them even more because it would legalize more than just dreamers and “could ultimately regularize the status of up to 10 million people”.
https://thehill.com/latino/563047-ma...in-budget-deal

So if Democrats and multinational corporations are willing to risk destroying the entire country for money and power then one of the things that must be done is to #boycotttheshot. Boycott the shot and boycott the boosters.

One supporter of amnesty is Bill Gates who has been one of the leaders in pushing the covid vaccine worldwide.
https://www.fwd.us/founders/

The other is William C. Weldon, Former Chairman of Johnson & Johnson, one of the makers of the vaccines.
http://www.newamericaneconomy.org/wp...rship_List.pdf

If Democrats and the left fear covid that much they will have to make a choice. What is more important to them? Amnesty or vaccinations. For Biden, the Democrats, and the left who preach "empathy", this will be a lesson in "empathy" for them.

All we keep hearing about is the plight of refugees and immigrants. We hear stories about refugees who "return to a country that they don't recognize, where they have no place, and they go back without their children or grandchildren".
https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/amp...-07/segment/01

Well that sounds similar to a story I read in the New York Times where a Virginia resident named Charles Poland said that the place where he lives is "a totally different world, ... If my parents came back today, they wouldn’t recognize the place. The changes came like a tidal wave." And the cause was an "influx of immigrants and their U.S.-born children".
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/09/u...publicans.html

In other words, by supporting amnesty the Democrats are doing to their own citizens what foreign leaders in other countries have done to refugees who fled their countries.

How the left feels about covid, is how people on the right feel about amnesty. For those who consider boycotting the shot to be dangerous, I say that amnesty and our own federal government are even more dangerous than covid. America has a much bigger problem than the pandemic and that is the #PANDEMOCRAT which is a combination of greedy corporations, power hungry Democrats, and illegal aliens creating an existential threat to the country for their own benefit.

For those on the left and the elite who want to accuse me of deliberately putting people in danger by boycotting the shot, my response is "Shut Up". I would rather get covid than have amnesty. If the the choice is between getting covid and having amnesty, I consider getting covid to be the lesser of two evils. And I also think that both amnesty and vaccinations are driven by greed, that the shot is unsafe and ineffective and that amnesty is more harmful and a potential existential threat to the country.

As, Bernie Sanders, the author of the amnesty budget resolution, a.k.a. #selloutsanders said back in 2015: "Open borders ... you're doing away with the concept of a nation state, and I don't think there's any country in the world that believes in that."
https://www.vox.com/2015/7/28/901449...x-conversation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf-k6qOfXz0

And I will add that amnesty to use the words of Bernie Sanders is also "doing away with the concept of a nation state".

So one of best ways to to fight back against it and have our voices heard is to boycott the shot.

On CNN, Dr. Reed Tuckson, a founding member of the Black Coalition Against COVID-19 said this: "We have to overcome the distrust, the historical and contemporary distrust that people of color have with the government, with elites, with the medical care system. These seeds of distrust have been sown in our culture for generation after generation. But, unfortunately, they are watered every day, so that, when people of color see the active engagement of voter disenfranchisement, when we see the elements of unfairness in our criminal justice system, all of those things bleed over into health care and into the decisions that people make about vaccines."
https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/amp...-30/segment/01

This means that I also support the idea of proactively going out and trying to show blacks who are vaccine hesitant how amnesty hurts their wages and get them to #BoycottTheShot too.

A group of House Republicans issued a letter against amnesty. It can be read at https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ts-voter-base/

Let's contact them and try to get them to form an anti-amnesty Congressional Caucus and have them collectively as a group come out and call for a boycotting of the vaccines if amnesty goes through using the hashtag #boycotttheshot.

The link for the contact directory for the entire House of Representatives can be found at https://www.house.gov/representatives


So supporters of amnesty will have to choose between vaccinations or amnesty. Perhaps this boycott will reveal what really matters to the elite and the left.