Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
03-01-2007, 02:04 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 486
Aid groups wary of immigration laws
Aid groups wary of immigration laws
Three groups that work with immigrants say new rules don’t effect them
John Colson
Vail, CO Colorado
February 28, 2007
ASPEN — A new Colorado law aimed at preventing illegal aliens from getting public assistance has some regional nonprofits scratching their heads about whether they can provide help to their traditional clients, many of whom may well be in this country illegally.
Representatives of three of the Roaring Fork Valley’s better known nonprofit organizations — Catholic Charities, Lift-Up and English in Action — said that while the full impact of the new laws is not yet known, they believe their services may not be affected.
But they are worried nonetheless.
“There’s a lot of work being done just to get the law clarified,” said Julie Fox-Rubin, director of the Basalt-based English In Action, which offers English language instruction to anyone who wants it. Many who take part in the program are immigrants from Mexico and Latin America.
And while Fox-Rubin said time and resources must be redirected toward figuring out how the new law affects her organization, “that’s time that some might say would be better spent providing services.”
New law requires anyone providing public assistance to confirm that recipients are in the United States legally and eligible to receive subsidies.
Local governments also are trying to understand the new legislation. They already have made changes in the way they deal with nonprofits looking for public grants. The city of Aspen and Pitkin County have rewritten their grant contracts, including requirements that any recipients be cleared as legally eligible.
Eagle County also is casting a critical eye at its grants program, said Tom Ziemann, who runs Catholic Charities, a local nonprofit organization that stands to lose a significant portion of its budget if the state law is applied.
And there is confusion created at the state level, too.
Fox-Rubin and Ziemann both said the state attorney general’s office has issued two “clarifications” about the applicability of the new laws. But, said Fox-Rubin, “there are still more questions.”
‘We don’t ask’
One of the provisions of the laws — which mandates that any “applicant” be checked out to determine legal status — is seen as key. The word “applicant” implies an application for services, and the three nonprofits contacted for this story said they have no application process for most of their services.
At English in Action, Fox-Rubin said people simply show up at the classes and improve on their English language skills. No application is required.
“I think nonprofits really want to follow the law,” said Fox-Rubin. “They’re just not sure what the law is.”
The same is largely true for the other two organizations.
“I don’t expect it to have any impact on us at all,” said Lift-Up Director Mike Powell, because “Lift-Up doesn’t ask. Because we don’t ask, we don’t know how many illegal immigrants we serve.”
The lack of applications is a reflection of the organization’s mission — to help people who say they need it, whether it comes in the form of holiday food baskets, warm clothes, temporary housing for the homeless or a hot meal at a soup kitchen, Powell said.
“We would rather help one who didn’t need it than miss out on one who did,” he said. “There’s probably a lot of people who take advantage of us, and we accept that.”
Lift-Up is a faith-based organization, started by churches in the 1980s — and churches do not restrict their ministries by asking whether someone is a legal citizen, he said.
“If people come in to worship, are you going to have to find out if they’re legal or not?” he asked.
With four different types of social services, Ziemann said his organization is “very diverse in what we do.” Catholic Charities offers emergency help in a crisis, such as paying rent, utilities, prescription drugs or a bus ticket for its clients.
It also offers “transitional housing” for the homeless; legal help with immigration issues; and something Ziemann admitted was a “controversial” service: “Immigrant community advocacy,” which includes help with such things as job disputes and landlord-tenant hassles.
Making up $25,000
Ziemann said he takes the long view of the new laws, arguing that the state let itself get caught up in “a rush to create these laws that would appeal to an anti-immigrant sentiment.”
And that happened because “the federal government has failed to act,” he said, referring to the confusing and conflicting federal laws governing immigration, and the fact that despite promises to clean up the mess, Washington has not passed a comprehensive immigration reform act.
Ziemann said U.S. immigration laws only permit 5,000 Mexicans per year, for example, to come into this country legally, despite “this professed need for millions of workers.”
And, he said, this is the first time in U.S. history that the immigration laws have effectively closed the door to legal migration across international borders.
“It’s a matter of justice,” Ziemann declared. “The law is unjust.”
But aside from that, he continued, “It does not apply to Catholic Charities. We don’t have an application ... there’s no means testing” to get help from the organization, except in very specific cases, such as the provision of housing with federal funds, he said.
In such cases, he said, “We’re still trying to work some things out.”
As an example of the problem, Catholic Charities has an annual budget of more than $400,000, and roughly $65,000 of that is expected to come from local government grants this year.
Of that amount, he said, $25,000 expected from Eagle County already is jeopardized because of the government’s concerns that Catholic Charities may not be complying with the state law.
Ziemann said he is getting set to put out an appeal to the county’s Catholic community for help, because “we’ve got to make up that $25,000.”
http://www.vaildaily.com/article/200702 ... /FRONTPAGE
-
03-01-2007, 03:32 PM #2
Any group that aids illegals should lose their tax free status. It is illegal to aid illegals and these groups have been knowingly giving aid to illegals. While ICE is going after organizations who hire illegals they should also be going after aid groups. As long as illegals are given something for nothing they are going to continue the invasion.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote
DHS Proposes Steep Increase in Naturalization Fees | 06/25/2026
06-25-2026, 10:22 PM in General Discussion