Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #11
    Senior Member azwreath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,621
    Quote Originally Posted by MW
    miguelina wrote:

    These athletes are LEGAL, doesn't matter where they were born. We've got US born athletes who are competing for mexico! They couldn't make the US team?
    What's that say about the sport(s)? As a youth I remember being told on numerous occasions that it's not whether you win or lose, but how you play the game that counts. I still believe there is a lot of truth to that old saying. Personally, I think all those that represent our country in the olympics games should be American born or a naturalized U.S. citizen. For eligibility to become a naturalized U.S. citizen, you must first be a legal permanent resident for five years (green card holder). Just being legal isn't good enough for me because that can happen with a simple wave of a wand. I would like to know that the participants have a stake in our country, not just brought in to represent us. Hiring mercenaries to do the work Americans should be doing just doesn't seem right to me.





    That was exactly the point of my post MW.

    If we look at the history of Olympic athletes, it is true that we have seen several who achieved celebrity status and went on to turn that into fame and fortune.

    But they are the very few among the countless athletes who have represented the US over the long history of the games and the fact of the matter is that the majority of these athletes just vanish into obscurity once they have served their purpose.

    Many live productive lives but just as many more do not.....stuck in minimum wage jobs, living in poverty, having fallen into substance abuse and/or a criminal record. In other words, once having participated in the Olympics does not guarantee a successful, productive existence.

    Is it really, then, in our best interests to be considering possible use....and "use" is all it is......of a person for his or her very limited potential as an Olympic athlete when we think about immigration policy or reform?

    I don't believe that the answer to that question should be yes.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #12
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,797
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #13
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    miguelina wrote:

    Olympic team rules state that you must be a US citizen to compete for a US team. I tend to use the term legal anytime someone mentions US citizens who are foreign-born. Sorry for the confusion.
    Oh, okay. I assumed you were say the only requirement was to be a legal resident of the U.S. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •