Amendments challenge immigration bill

http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/newssentin ... 325317.htm

By Karoun Demirjian
Chicago Tribune
Jun. 05, 2007

WASHINGTON - About 30 amendments: That's what stands between a new plan for controlling immigration into the United States and passage in the Senate.

But those amendments - proposed by Republican and Democratic critics of the bipartisan measure under consideration - may prove to be a political minefield that lawmakers will have to carefully navigate if they hope to reach the finish line with a bill that can command 60 votes to end any possible filibuster.

The Senate begins voting on the amendments Tuesday, with numerous close votes expected that could be deal-breakers for the senators who crafted the measure and shepherded it through earlier challenges.

Insiders say its fate will depend in large part on whether those senators are able to stick by the amended product.

Though the group of so-called "grand bargainers" has maintained a united front thus far, their bond is not necessarily airtight.

Conservatives especially are under enormous pressure from their constituents to abandon the bill, seen by many as amnesty providing citizenship for 12 million immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally. Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., were even booed at Republican Party caucuses over the Memorial Day recess.

As Republican and Democratic senators decide where their patience with tweaks to the bill ends, it appears the debate will come down to two issues: how far to go in disciplining illegal immigrants, and what to do about their families.

Here's a primer:

Defining Crime: Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, has offered an amendment to expand the categories of crimes that would prevent illegal immigrants from legalizing their status in the U.S.

He says it will help keep terrorists, drunken drivers and gang members out of the country. But most Democrats call this proposal a deal-breaker, saying Cornyn's categories would punish individuals with clean records whose only encounters with law enforcement are those related to their status as illegal immigrants.

The office of Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., estimates that Cornyn's amendment could keep as many as half the agricultural workers expected to receive visas under the bill out of the country.

All in the Family: Four amendments aimed at making the bill more sympathetic to family reunification are pending before the Senate, with a fifth expected this week. Lauded by pro-immigrant groups, these amendments pose special challenges for Democrats, under pressure from Republicans who have threatened to withdraw their support for the bill if some of them are approved.

One measure, promoted by presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, would increase the number of green cards available to the spouses and minor children of legal permanent residents. One proposal favored by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., another presidential contender, would do the same for parents of U.S. citizens, and increase the duration of family visitor visas from 30 to 180 days. Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., has said this measure would be a deal-breaker for conservatives.

Democrats are also taking aim at the proposed points-based system, which would reward applicants with higher levels of education and special skills with preferred immigration status. Sens. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., are taking double-aim at this system with one proposal to increase the points allotted to family members of those already here and another to entirely end the point-based system after five years.

More Green Cards: The Senate will consider a bipartisan proposal to expedite more legal immigrant applications in the next eight years. The amendment would change the cutoff filing date from May 2005 to January 1, 2007, and put green cards in the hands of an additional estimated 833,000 immigrants - another possible deal-breaker for Republicans wary of overloading the system.

The Senate is hoping to complete consideration of the amendments this week or soon thereafter; no House action is planned on immigration without Senate passage of a bill. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has not yet indicated when or if he will file a cloture motion to end debate - a move that might be necessary as some Republicans have already threatened to filibuster against the bill.