Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member zeezil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    16,593

    Analyst says Specter's new immigration plan 'same-old' amnes

    Analyst says Specter's new immigration plan 'same-old' amnesty
    Jim Brown
    OneNewsNow.com
    August 1, 2007
    http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/08/analy ... w_immi.php

    A policy analyst with a prominent conservative think tank says a new immigration bill set to be introduced by Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania) is, in many ways, a rehashing of the amnesty legislation that failed in the Senate in June.

    Hear this Report --Note click on the link for the article, bring the article up and then clikc on the "Hear this Report" for an audio repoet on Specter's upcoming bill.

    Senator Specter says his bill would not include the controversial Z-visa program that would have granted amnesty to millions of illegal aliens living in the U.S. However, the legislation would allow illegal aliens to sponsor their entire extended family for admission into the U.S. The chain-migration provision would replace the skills-based points system included in the previous immigration bill.

    Jim Edwards is an adjunct fellow with the Hudson Institute, a conservative think tank in Washington. He says Specter's bill appears to be the "same-old same-old" the Senate just defeated, minus a few things.

    "What he is dropping out is the skills-based point system. There was a minor step towards some rationality in the Senate bill which would have allowed points to be accrued by a potential immigrant based on his level of skills, education, and things of that nature that we might actually need," says Edwards.

    The Hudson Institute fellow recalls the public's general response to the earlier bill that was aimed at immigration reform. "The American people, when they paid attention on this, were pretty adamant and pretty one-sided in terms of their rejection of the Senate bill," he shares.

    Edwards redicts that since there is so little change in this bill, compared to the previously defeated immigration bill, the American people will "rise up in arms once again." He says because of this he doubts the Senate will be eager to take up Specter's bill.

    Specter claims to have consulted with President Bush, Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, and Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez regarding his bill.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    Specter claims to have consulted with President Bush, Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, and Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez regarding his bill.


    What a joke, those are the exact people that shouldn't be consulted when constructing an immigration bill! What happened, Specter, you left off La Raza and Kennedy.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member Populist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,085
    Let's hope senators aren't foolish enough to take up Specter's scheme so soon after the last "comprehensive" amnesty scheme was rejected by the overwhelming majority of American people.

    And of course, Kyl, Graham, Kennedy and gang are just going to try and sneak amnesty through on us piecemeal, after they have thrown a couple of bones to us on border security. WE WILL NOT BE FOOLED BY THIS!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •