Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member zeezil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    16,593

    Everyone ignores a major source of illegal immigration

    Everyone ignores a major source of illegal immigration
    The Center for Immigration Studies sent this press release this week:

    New Paper Examines Visa Overstays

    WASHINGTON, March 24 — While presidential candidates promise to secure the border, the other major source of illegal immigration is largely ignored — lax visa policies. Visa overstays account for between one-quarter to one-half of the illegal-alien population, and fencing, unmanned aerial vehicles, National Guard patrols, etc., are irrelevant to controlling this part of the immigration problem.

    To shine some light on this neglected weakness, the Center for Immigration Studies has published a new paper, “No Coyote Needed: U.S. Visas Still an Easy Ticket in Developing Countries,â€
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    9,455
    I don't think we are ignoring this, at least not those familiar with this issue as most of us here at ALIPAC are. I want those who overstay a visa to be removed from this country just as I would any other illegal invader. They have no right to be here anymore than someone who breached our non-existent southern border does.

    There are anywhere from 20-30 million illegals in this country. I have a hard time believing that half of those arrived via a valid visa through a legitimate port of entry. Maybe these numbers are correct. In any event. I do believe we need to substantially reduce the number of visas we allow into this country, especially from those countries that have a notoriously high number of illegals already residing in the United States. It would make sense to do this until we can get this issue under control.



    .
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Bowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    North Mexico aka Aztlan
    Posts
    7,055
    Why not make visitors from third world countries pay a $5000 deposit for their visa? Once they leave they get the $5000 back. If they don't leave after 6 months they lose the money and it is given to a bounty hunter who tracks them down and gives them to ICE for deportation.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    Bowman wrote:

    Why not make visitors from third world countries pay a $5000 deposit for their visa? Once they leave they get the $5000 back. If they don't leave after 6 months they lose the money and it is given to a bounty hunter who tracks them down and gives them to ICE for deportation.
    I like it.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Evanston, IL
    Posts
    183

    I agree with a deposit

    I think the visa entry deposit idea is a good one. I first heard it mentioned on the movie "Border".

    We could require a $5000 deposit upon entry, which would be placed in an interest bearing account. When the visa holder exits the country they are given back the deposit with interest. If they overstay their visa, the money is lost.

    Can you imagine if we had $5000 for every visa overstayer already here?

    Of course, there would have to be controls dictating where the money went, as otherwise states would continue to get screwed on Federal reimbursement. But I think, overall, it's a good idea.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •