Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
02-07-2017, 09:30 PM #1
Appeals Court Rejects Immigrants’ Right to a Lawyer in Expedited Cases
Appeals Court Rejects Immigrants’ Right to a Lawyer in Expedited Cases
Judges uphold deportation of a Mexican immigrant who had argued for right to hire legal counsel
By JOE PALAZZOLO
Feb. 7, 2017 6:13 p.m. ET 4 COMMENTS
Immigrants who are caught entering the U.S. illegally have no right to legal representation, a federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled on Tuesday.
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the deportation of a Mexican immigrant who was arrested while crossing into the U.S. in 2012 and returned to his country the following day.
The ruling, from a three-judge panel, came hours before a different Ninth Circuit panel was set to consider an executive order by President Donald Trump that temporary suspended travel from seven countries and halted the admission of refugees.
The ruling Tuesday dealt with whether immigrants caught entering the U.S. illegally have due process rights to legal counsel under the Fifth Amendment, an issue separate from those raised in the executive-order challenge.
Under a 1996 federal law, Customs and Border Protection officers can use a process called “expedited removal” to swiftly deport immigrants who are caught within 100 miles of the border without valid entry documents and who have been in the U.S. fewer than 14 days.
Immigrants subject to expedited removal receive no hearing, see no judge and have no right to appeal. Nearly half of all removals from the U.S. follow this process, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
Rufino Peralta-Sanchez, who was caught by U.S. Border Patrol agents a mile inside the U.S. border, had argued for a right to hire a lawyer to assist him during the removal process.
Judge Jay Bybee, writing for a 2-1 majority, said allowing lawyers to take part in expedited removals would defeat their purpose, “exponentially increasing the cost to the government as the government must detain the alien, pay for the government’s own representation, pay for the creation of a longer record, and pay for the increased time the immigration officer must spend adjudicating such case.”
The Trump administration is considering expanding eligibility for expedited removal to include immigrants who have been in the U.S. longer and are arrested farther from the U.S. border.
Kara Hartzler, who represents Mr. Peralta-Sanchez, said such changes, combined with Tuesday’s ruling, would mean that a vast number of immigrants living in the U.S. could be summarily deported without counsel.
Judge Harry Pregerson used his dissent to condemn what he called a “flawed” and “cruel” system of expedited removals that can result in the improper deportation of asylum seekers who express a credible fear of persecution back home.
A spokeswoman for the U.S. attorney’s office in San Diego, which represented the federal government, declined to comment.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/appeals...ses-1486509228
NO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
02-07-2017, 09:39 PM #2
OUTSTANDING !!!!
ILLEGAL ALIENS HAVE "BROKEN" OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM
DO NOT REWARD THEM - DEPORT THEM ALL
-
02-07-2017, 11:15 PM #3
The 9th did this???? I'm shocked and pleased.
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
02-07-2017, 11:20 PM #4
I heard a discussion the other day that said that the 9th Circuit is a mixed bag, that while leaning left with the majority of their Judges, it does have some moderate and conservative Judges, and with the 3 Judge or 1 Judge issue, you can luck out and get a moderate or conservative to decide your issue. Maybe that's what happened here. Article says it was a 3 Judge Panel and maybe 2 were moderates/conservatives. Or maybe sometimes, the liberals get it right!!
A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
Similar Threads
-
Appeals court puts 5 deportation cases on hold
By Ratbstard in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 1Last Post: 02-07-2012, 02:35 PM -
Court rejects Obama birthplace lawyer again
By JohnDoe2 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 10-12-2011, 11:40 PM -
Hawaii appeals court rejects 'birther' appeal
By JohnDoe2 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 2Last Post: 04-10-2011, 07:16 PM -
Appeals court rejects sanctuary policy lawsuit
By AirborneSapper7 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 8Last Post: 02-01-2011, 09:01 PM -
Texas appeals court rejects treaty violation argument
By alexz in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 3Last Post: 11-16-2006, 01:50 AM
72 Hours Till Deadline: Durbin moves on Amnesty
04-28-2024, 02:18 PM in illegal immigration Announcements