Thread: CAN: Critics of candidates over NAU/SPP Agenda

Stephane Dion muzzles Liberal candidates over NAU agenda

by Dr. François Gagné


Stephane Dion.


Stephane Dion's Liberals would likely be far ahead of Stephen Harper's Conservatives, if Liberal candidates were allowed to warn Canadians about the North American Union (NAU) agenda. Yes, it was a Liberal who was first responsible for supporting that agenda. This Liberal was former Prime Minister Paul Martin in 2005. Mr. Martin had practically signed over Canada to the U.S. Bush administration in 2005 through the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). The SPP is the "Constitution" for the North American Union, which was designed to destroy the sovereignty of Canada as a democracy, under the guide of "fighting terror".

Mr. Dion as the new Liberal leader could have sought to repudiate that Agreement in the spirit of former Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, who against a well financed campaign, thwarted neo-con Prime Minister Brian Mulroney's Meech Lake Accord, which was a clandestine attempt to break up Canada on behalf of U.S. interests. However, the Liberal Party of Canada, that was once the party of national unity and 'Canadianization', has become a mere shadow of itself.

The Liberal Party was once a great movement which was inspired by a passion for Canada, and a vision of Canada as a progressive society. Its leaders included Sir Wilfrid Laurier who had declared that 20th century would be for Canada to blossom; Lester B. Pearson who had won the Noble Peace Prize and championed our Canadian Maple Leaf Flag. Pierre Elliot Trudeau had fought for the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Multiculturalism; Canadian economic sovereignty from the repatriated our Constitution from British colonialism. Since John Turner lost the "Free Trade" election in 1988, the Liberal Party has been taken over by minions of U.S. corporate dominance.

Having prostituted itself to the interests of the U.S. political-military-industrial, Dion's Liberals have had to relegate themselves to fighting an uninspired and token campaign oriented around a "green tax", allegedly for environmental protection. The campaign that Dion ought to be fighting is against Stephen Harper's SPP-NAU agenda, that is also backed apparently by media elites who donate to Conservative Party causes. That is why media organizations like CTV have gone out of their way to be a public relations instrument for Stephen Harper. It is no wonder why Mr. Harper has been leading in the opinion polls so far, having the backing of treasonous collaborators who feed Canadians disinformation about Stephen Harper's political intentions to Canada. Mr. Dion has apparently made himself a collaborator to an apparent treasonous agenda against Canada. Liberal candidates who seek to collaborate with an apparent orchestrated conspiracy of silence over the SPP-NAU agenda, also betray their own lack of integrity.

It seems that Stephane Dion, who is a dual citizen of France, has sought to surrender Canada in the spirit of the Frenchmen who sold out to the Nazis in Vichy France, during World War II. Both the Conservative and Liberal party that collude with the SPP-NAU agenda have betrayed all of Canada. If there are any Liberals who have any integrity, which may be asking a lot, the time to do it is now. If the Liberals seek to win, then they must honour Canada, defend our national destiny, and defend party traditions, as the champions of the defence of Canadian sovereignty from a U.S. take-over agenda. This is the kind of leadership that Canadians expect of the Liberal Party, rather that the fraud of a campaign that corporate backers of the Liberal have sought to spread through Stephane Dion and his hand-picked appointed candidates and other confederates.

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/F ... 02607.html

NAU architects seek to block Elizabeth May from Federal Election Debate

by Dr. Richard Lapointe


Elizabeth May.


A prime objective of the North American Union (NAU) agenda signed by former Prime Minister Paul Martin back in 2005, that is now fully endorsed by current Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative Party government, is to pillage Canadian natural resources. This pillaging currently includes the environmentally disastrous Alberta "Tar Sands". The U.S. political-military-industrial complex seeks to destroy a precious Boreal forest area larger than the State of Florida, along with Alberta's ground water.

The federal election was called to pursue the execution of the Conservative Party majority, to consolidate the NAU, using the "Shock Doctrine" tactics documented by Naomi Klein.

CanWest Global and CTVGlobeMedia appear to be playing key public relations role in helping NAU architects reach their objectives. It is therefore no surprise that Elizabeth's May Green Party has encountered resistance by the political to her entry in any debate against Stephen Harper.

Ms. May's entry would ruin the script that the U.S. Secretariat of the NAU has apparently orchestrated for this Canadian federal election. This includes Mr. Harper's disinformation that protecting the environment would undermine "economic development" or that environmental conservation is "too costly".

In Mr. Harper's apparent view 'Earth is not worth it', and after all, according to Mr. Harper, "humans are not really dependent upon their environmental for their quality-of-survival", so why bother protecting it? Exploit it; pollute it, and whateva, because "greed drives human progress".

What? You have never heard of the NAU? Then educate yourself; but don't wait for NAU backed corporate media organizations to help facilitate your critical awareness about what is arguably could be the worst scandal in Canadian history, that is linked to treason and an apparent fascist agenda. The Canadian has published diverse articles about the NAU agenda.

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/F ... 02608.html