Thread: Brownshirts are marching toward a Brown America

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=53314

Brownshirts are marching toward a Brown America

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: December 11, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
– The Denver Post, Dec. 1, 2006

''Violence erupted at a Michigan law school Thursday when protestors tried to block a speech by Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo. Police were called after protestors pulled a fire alarm prior to the speech on immigration policies. There were at least three violent incidents with protestors targeting student backers of the event ... .''

– The Denver Post, Dec. 1, 2006

The increasingly lawless behavior of the pro-immigration forces in America is both informative and telling. It is a clear warning of precisely what these forces stand for as well as what they hope America will become. For the problem is not that America is being invaded by millions of semi-civilized aliens with no cultural or historical ties to American traditions and liberties, or respect for them, but that America is being transformed by these invaders.

As Umberto Eco pointed out in his 1990 essay entitled ''Migrazioni,'' there is a crucial difference between immigration and migration. In the case of immigration, it is the immigrant who is transformed. This was the case in historical immigrations from Ireland, Germany, Italy and Scandinavia, where the immigrating generation quickly adapted to the language and culture of its new land and the second and third generations were all but impossible to distinguish from Americans who could trace their roots back to the original colonies.

This adaptation was made possible by three factors. First, the desire of the immigrants to become Americans. This can be seen in the readiness with which past immigrants changed their names and quickly adopted English, to such an extent that the third generation rarely spoke more than a word or two of their grandfather's tongue. Second, the similarities between the Western, Christian cultures of Europe and the Western, Christian culture of the United States. Third, the number and the proportion of immigrants was smaller, for example, 3.5 million Irish immigrants arriving over a 60-year period versus more than 9.8 million Mexicans entering in the last two decades.

Obviously, this is not immigration, this is a migration, and in the case of a migration, it is the destination that is transformed, not the immigrants.

Destination transformation is a perverse, but common consequence of migratory behavior. While it seems counterintuitive to leave one place in favor of another, then seek to recreate the very situation one previously fled, this is actually normal human behavior. And despite the inflammatory attacks on those who very reasonably oppose this transformation, there is nothing wrong with opposing it. Does it make a Washingtonian racist to oppose the Californication of his state? Is a Naples, Fla. resident bigoted simply because he dislikes sitting in gridlocked traffic all winter as his city is temporarily transformed into a southern suburb of Minneapolis?

Of course not. The real distinction between Brown America and America is not racial, but rather cultural and ideological. The problem with Brown America is not that sunscreen sales will take a hit, but that Brown America will be indistinguishable from every other semi-civilized third-world country in its disregard for human liberty, its contempt for law and limited government, and its short-sighted abuse of society's most productive classes. One can already see this situation developing in Mexifornia, and the fact that Brown America's most enthusiastic proponents so readily demonstrate their disdain for elemental American concepts such as the freedom of speech and the right to free assembly highlights the great ideological divide.

There is nothing moral about the pro-immigration position. Would the Michigan brownshirts argue that America must also be willing to accept the importation of 10 percent of the Chinese or Indian populations? If not, on what basis could they possibly argue for granting citizenship to masses of Mexican nationals while denying the claims of the Chinese and Indian masses to the same? The truth is that even the proponents of Brown America believe in immigration restrictions, they would merely set the numerical limit much higher than those who value historical America and its freedoms.

Given that their position is so nonsensical and the way in which any serious discussion will reveal that fact, it is little wonder that the brownshirts are so desperate to stifle all debate on the matter. But they will not be able to hide long behind disingenuous accusations of racism and ''hate,'' not when even a shameless multiculturalist such as British Prime Minister Tony Blair is being forced to retreat from his long-held pro-immigration extremism: ''Failure to talk about multiculturalism is not politically correct, it's stupid. ... Very good intentions got the better of us.''

Unfortunately, the fact that most Americans support immigration restrictions and alien deportations in order to preserve their nation does not mean that the Democratic Congress or the Republican White House will cooperate, either now or in the future. Brown America is not the chance result of huddled Mexican masses yearning to breathe free, it is simply the bi-factional ruling party's Brechtian solution to the problem of American liberty; dissolving one people and electing another.

Makes a lot of sense, hope it's read by many!