Thread: Bush hopes to revive immigration bill by emphasizing border

Bush hopes to revive immigration bill by emphasizing border security, say officials
June 10, 2007

WASHINGTON -- President Bush is not giving up on his plan to legalize millions of unlawful immigrants and will seek to convince skeptical GOP senators that it secures the nation's borders, administration officials said Sunday.

But the Senate's No. 2 Democratic leader said he was uncertain about the prospects for a deal. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois cited opposition from a group of Senate conservatives who contend the legislation guarantees amnesty to illegal immigrants.

"We need a breakthrough on the Republican side," Durbin said.

Tony Snow, White House spokesman, and Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez both predicted an immigration bill would pass once Bush meets with lawmakers this week and Congress reconsidered the measure.

Snow said Bush planned to listen to senators' concerns when he meets with GOP senators for a scheduled lunch Tuesday. Bush has been placing phone calls to Republican senators from Air Force One during a European trip.

"I think one of the things you do in this is you listen," said Snow, when asked what Bush planned to say. "And I think one of the concerns a lot of people have, at least around the country, is they say, 'Look, how can we trust you guys to enforce this? You had a border that's been open for 21 years. How can we trust you?"'

"If you take a look at the bill, it is the largest investment ever in border security," he said.

Last week, Senate backers of the immigration bill fell 15 votes short of the 60 needed to limit debate and allow a vote on the measure. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., then set the measure aside, calling it "the president's bill" and saying Bush's direct intervention was crucial to reviving it.

The legislation would tighten borders and offer employers more temporary workers from abroad in addition to providing lawful status to an estimated 12 million illegal aliens and putting many of them on a path toward citizenship.

Noting that the measure calls for investing in border security and would hit employers with harsher punishments for hiring illegal immigrants, Snow said the Senate could "wrap this up in two days" if Reid allowed additional debate on it.

Several Senate conservatives have said they were not allowed to offer enough changes to the bill, such as making it easier to detect and deport immigrants who have overstayed their visas or committed other violations.

"Our sense is if Majority Leader Harry Reid brings it back up, which he should, and permits a full debate, ... we're not only going to get a bill, but we're going to get a better bill, and it's going to be one that answers the express objections of a lot of people and, I think, provides a way of answering skeptics on issues like security," Snow said.

Gutierrez agreed. "I believe the votes were there, and I think some senators felt they needed more time and some amendments that did not get their due hearing," he said. "I have no doubt. This is going to go through because it's the right bill."

But Durbin said the Senate already had two weeks of debate on the issue. Reid finally sought to cut off discussion when it became clear that several Republican senators who opposed the proposal offered "amendment after amendment after amendment, to the point where this was bogging down," Durbin said.

"It reached a point, a real impasse," he said. "So it will take some leadership on the Republican side to agree on the number of amendments, to agree that we're not going to waste more time and procedural slowdowns, and really get to the heart of the issue."

Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., said a compromise was possible but would take "hard work." Additional changes to the measure could improve chances for passage yet could doom it, too, he said.

"Every time you try and enforce the borders more, you offend people on the left. Whenever you try and regularize the status of people, you offend folk who want to enforce the border," Bayh said. "So, yes, there's a possibility. But I don't think we should be naive about it."

Gutierrez said it would be a "big mistake" if senators were to abandon the bill after coming so close to passage.

"I think the big picture is we have a bill here that will strengthen national security, that will improve our economy, that will make us a stronger society and if somebody has a problem with some of the tactics and the clerical issues and the details, let's debate them," he said. "But we should not walk away and keep the status quo."

Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl, a Republican supporter of the immigration bill, said he believes skeptical conservatives can be persuaded to support the measure.

"All we have to do on the Republican side is sit down with those who have amendments, get those amendments in a reasonable package, not too many, but enough so all of the members can say they had their chance," he said.

Snow and Durbin appeared on "Fox News Sunday," while Gutierrez, Bayh and Kyl were on "Late Edition" on CNN.

http://www1.whdh.com/news/articles/national/BO54619/

"I think one of the things you do in this is you listen," said Snow, when asked what Bush planned to say.

That has so much spin on it that Tony should have whiplash.

Listen to Big Business, Special Interest Groups, The Mexican Government...

Bush, how many phone calls have you received from Americans protesting your grand compromise?

Why don't you be honest and tell us how busy the switchboad has been against your bad bill.

All I have to say is border smorder. More security on the border is not going to deal with the ignore it and look the other way amnesty.

We want our laws enforced and no "new" bill is going to take that away from us. Not our fault you sat back and let 12 million illegal alien invaders come into our country. Yea, you can "get tough" in Iraq but not at home where it matters.

Dixie

"I think one of the things you do in this is you listen," said Snow, when asked what Bush planned to say. "And I think one of the concerns a lot of people have, at least around the country, is they say, 'Look, how can we trust you guys to enforce this? You had a border that's been open for 21 years. How can we trust you?"'

You are really funny Tony!!!! You think by saying these words that NOW we can trust you and you will close the border!!!!

YOU CANNOT BE TRUSTED!!! If any senator wants to destroy their political career... THEN THEY SHOULD LISTEN TO YOU!!!!

Senators: If you listen to this, IMO, MADMAN...YOUR CAREERS ARE OVER!!!

"I think the big picture is we have a bill here that will strengthen national security, that will improve our economy, that will make us a stronger society and if somebody has a problem with some of the tactics and the clerical issues and the details, let's debate them," he said. "But we should not walk away and keep the status quo."

Strengthen our national security? How, by just saying all illegals are now legal that will stop even more illegals to invade trying to get in on this or the next amnesty?

Impove our economy? Maybe if your are a crooked, low wage addicted employer how cares more about profits and personal wealth than the culture, heritage and future of the country.

A stronger society? What a joke, how does inviting millions of third world, unassimilatable, non English speaking, illiterate (in both English and Spanish), uneducated, unskilled, drop out prone, welfare, healthcare, food stamp and section 8 housing dependent, massive anchor baby spewing, America hating foreigners make our society stronger?

As far as debating the issues, how do we do that when the likes of you treasonous, lying, name calling, race baiting traitors refuse to honestly argue the facts. Bush and his cabinet cronies will not acknowledge the costs incurred by the taxpayers, or the damage caused by masses of school and hospital destroying, social service draining, community ruining invaders. How can we debate the issues when they absolutely refuse to face the facts that any child can clearly see? The people are more than willing to debate the issues, if only the politicians will acknowlegde the truth of the matter, illegals are destroying this country, not benefitting it, and no amount of phony propaganda can change that.

Send old Gutierrez an email, I just did...told him that our government was forcing Americans to foot the bill for illegal lawbreakers.....then asked him why he thought Americans have to "fund the world"?

CGutierrez@doc.gov

Originally Posted by jean

[b]
Gutierrez said it would be a "big mistake" if senators were to abandon the bill after coming so close to passage.

Hey Einstein it only got 45 votes, 15 short of the 60 needed. That is not "close" is it 33% short!!