Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    8,399

    OR: Bush speech fuels immigration debate

    http://www.statesmanjournal.com/apps/pb ... /701270323

    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Bush speech fuels immigration debate

    Legislators, residents offer different ideas to solve hot-button issue

    THELMA GUERRERO
    Statesman Journal

    January 27, 2007

    A first-generation American on his mother's side, Joey Vasquez tunes in every time the topic of immigration reform rears its head.

    On Tuesday, he listened closely as President Bush called for congressional passage of immigration reform during his State of the Union address.

    Vasquez, 17, who lives in Silverton, reacted to the speech with optimism but stopped short of applauding the president for putting the hot-button issue back on the table.

    "So far, it's been a bunch of rigamarole and no action," the Chemeketa Community College student said.

    Vazquez is not alone in his sentiments.

    Whether they support or oppose the president's proposals, many people in the Salem area are skeptical that much will come of it.

    Aeryca Steinbauer, the coordinator of CAUSA, an immigrant-rights coalition in Woodburn, said immigrants and their families have heard it all before.

    They "have become sorely disappointed with the lack of follow-through," Steinbauer said.

    For Jim Ludwick, the president's immigration provision of the speech was a sign that he cares more about providing big business with cheap labor than about protecting the nation's borders.

    "He sold us out," said Ludwick, the president of Oregonians for Immigration Reform, a statewide group opposed to illegal immigration.

    During his speech, the president talked about the need for a guest-worker program.

    "As a result, these people won't have to try to sneak in, and that will leave border agents free to chase down drug smugglers, and criminals, and terrorists," the president said.

    He also touched on the need for reform that opens the door to legalization of noncitizens in the country.

    U.S. Rep. Darlene Hooley, D-Ore., said she supports a limited guest-worker program that would meet U.S. economy demands for certain jobs.

    However, "I am opposed to amnesty for illegal aliens," Hooley said.

    Instead, she supports a limited earned citizenship program that would give certain undocumented people a chance to work toward temporary resident status.

    To qualify, those workers would have to show a work and residency history, have no criminal record, have family ties to this country, pay back taxes and fines, and learn English, Hooley said.

    Geoff Stuckart, a spokesman for U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said the senator supports a program that would require an U.S. employer to demonstrate that they cannot find an American worker to do the job.

    "The senator believes that an orderly, trackable system is far preferable to an economy wholly dependent upon illegal migration," Stuckart said, adding that Wyden also supports tougher sanctions, increased fines and incarceration of employers who repeatedly hire illegal immigrants.

    As for granting legalization to noncitizens, Stuckart said Wyden prefers a policy that would call for noncitizens to go to the back of the line to wait their turn for a green card -- a five- to eight-year process.

    Calls to U.S. Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., were not returned.

    Attempts to overhaul the nation's immigration laws have stalled in recent years under a Republican-controlled Congress.

    With Democrats now the majority in the House and Senate, some experts think the odds of Congress passing an immigration-reform package are better this time.

    "It will still be as contentious an issue as it has been in the past," said Mary Pettenger, an assistant professor of political science at Western Oregon University.

    "I believe there will be something passed in the near future because the federal government is spending a lot of money on border security trying to keep people out," she added.

    Vasquez disagrees.

    "Too often, I see these politicians talk a lot but then just sit on the fence," he said. "I think they do that to keep from making enemies of their constituents and losing votes.

    "Meanwhile, nothing gets done."

    tguerrero@StatesmanJournal.com or (503) 399-6815
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,855
    However, "I am opposed to amnesty for illegal aliens," Hooley said.

    Instead, she supports a limited earned citizenship program that would give certain undocumented people a chance to work toward temporary resident status.

    To qualify, those workers would have to show a work and residency history, have no criminal record, have family ties to this country, pay back taxes and fines, and learn English, Hooley said.
    HUH?
    And this rocket scientist expects the American people to believe this?

    'Earned Citizenship for ILLEGALS = AMNESTY'
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •