Thread: CA-Latino organizations' names raise controversy

And now they want to change them names?

Like a name change is going to hide their agenda. A rose by any other name still smells sweet. Call it whatever you want......they have been exposed.

Originally Posted by butterbean

Hahaha. The REAL RACISTS have been EXPOSED. And now they want to change them names?

Ya don't you love it. Obviously, if they are even considering it, it's hurting them.

Their ethno-supremacist agenda won't be covered up by a simple name change...their advocacy and policies are still all about "advancing" an agenda for a group of people based on ethnicity....something that is no longer necessary in this country....we should and need to move beyond that...

Americans come in all colors/origins....no one group deserves special treatment or privilieges over another simply based on color or ethnicity....Get over it, La RAZA. Move on...mainstream Americans have woken up to your agenda and are overwhelmingly opposed to it, especially when U.S. taxpayers are providing tens of millions of dollars to fund it.

Last year, the group decided to change its name to CCNMA: Latino Journalists of California

Doesn't the word "Journalists" imply some impartiality?

I see more name-shattering critizism coming from that slug as well.

"Such a claim is so far outside of the mainstream of the Latino community that we find it incredible that our critics raise it as an issue," according to the National Council of La Raza's Web site. "NCLR has never supported and does not endorse the notion of a 'Reconquista' or 'Aztlan.'"

Other Latinos, such as Haro, call the claim "ridiculous."

"Give me the evidence. Where is this written? Give me the minutes to the meeting," Haro said. "Show me where this is going on. I've not seen it."






'Wherever there is a Mexican, there is Mexico.' FELIPE CALDERÓN

Our southern neighbor is not shy about expressing its intention to conquer the American Southwest, which Mexico regards as territory lost in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hildalgo in 1846. Mexican children are taught in school that the United States stole that land, which they call “Aztlan.â€

Thank you azwreath for posting comments made by these racist groups.

Originally Posted by butterbean

Thank you azwreath for posting comments made by these racist groups.

You're welcome ButterBean.

It's amazing how these people claim that they have no agenda for the United States, that they are not race based or racist, they are so misunderstood, that they have absolutely no idea where any of this reconquista "nonsense" comes from........yet there's literal mountains of proof in word, audio, and on film.

Any one of them can go right ahead and change their names....it doesn't change their stripes.

Ha Ha! A leopard can't change his spots. They can change their names all they want, but they will still be racist groups trying to squeeze the Americans.

Originally Posted by azwreath

Originally Posted by butterbean

Thank you azwreath for posting comments made by these racist groups.

You're welcome ButterBean.

It's amazing how these people claim that they have no agenda for the United States, that they are not race based or racist, they are so misunderstood, that they have absolutely no idea where any of this reconquista "nonsense" comes from........yet there's literal mountains of proof in word, audio, and on film.

Any one of them can go right ahead and change their names....it doesn't change their stripes.

Thanks azwreath I copied it for future reference.

Originally Posted by Gogo

[

Thanks azwreath I copied it for future reference.

You're welcome GoGo. Here's more:

The term Reconquista (in English, "reconquest") was popularized by Mexican writers Carlos Fuentes and Elena Poniatowska to describe the demographic and cultural presence of Mexicans into the Southwestern United States.[

The premise of this reconquest is an historical claim to the land prior to the presence of European-Americans. The term does not make a claim for Spaniard-Europeans but rather, for Mexicans, the majority of whom are mixed-blood and full-blood indigenous-blooded people


In more recent times, the notion of Indigenous liberation has become popularized by the Mexica Movement, a group based in Los Angeles. Whereas previous groups have advanced the notion of reclaiming only the U.S. Southwest, the Mexica Movement goes further by demanding that the entire North American continent be reclaimed by Mexicans, Central Americans, Native Americans, and Canadian First Nations.[2]


Mexica Movement Home Page declaration:



We are Nican Tlaca, the Indigenous People

of Canada, U.S., Mexico, and "Central America".


We reject all European divisions of our continent.

We reject the artificial border divisions of our people.

We reject the White Supremacist ideology
that claims Europeans are permanently endowed with the right
to define us and classify us to their liking.


We include "First Nation" and "Native American"

and "South American" Nican Tlaca (Indigenous People).


We say, "No to occupation!"

We say, "This is still our continent!"
We say, "Europeans are the illegals--since 1492!"



I wonder if the "civil rights organizations" are still having trouble seeing it?