Thread: Calm urged after judge's ruling called 'beyond absurd'

Oh My Goodness...I was so worried that we were going to upset Mexico...Pffffft

What a disgusting show by our legal system. You cant have a sovereign nation if a judge rules in favor of an invasion....duh

We need to keep an eye on this judge's career. See what she's appointed to next and if there has been a payoff.

Originally Posted by ReggieMay

We need to keep an eye on this judge's career. See what she's appointed to next and if there has been a payoff.

They know every mistake this judge has made as well as ever little thing about her/him. This is one corrupt administration I don't put ANYTHING past them. These people will try anything to flood this country with the last thing we need undereducated illegal immigrant criminals, they don't care how many Americans die, they don't care about all the drugs, crime, disease they bring, only money! How in the name of all that's good and holy can we sit by and allow some half @#$ dill weed of a POTUS even attempt this!

He needs to be impeached ! He needs to be tried for treason. Protecting illegal immigrants over Americans! That is beyond insane. This administration is pure evil.

An Abominable Decision
[Mark R. Levin]

This is a typical example of a judge stating the correct legal standard, but then ignoring it and applying the test in a fashion completely divorced from the facts of the case in order to reach a predetermined decision.

First, the court states correctly that the sort of constitutional challenge brought here — a facial challenge — is the most difficult challenge to mount successfully. It requires that the plaintiff (here the federal government) must demonstrate that the law can never be applied in a constitutional fashion. The test cannot be met with hypothetical arguments — yet that is exactly what the court relies on in its ruling: the assertion that the AZ law will impose an impermissible burden on law enforcement, which is to determine the legal status of a person detained pursuant to the AZ law on the reasonable suspicion that the person is in the country illegally. The court does not provide any empirical basis to support its conclusion. It’s pure supposition.

As the court notes, the burden a party must meet when engaging in a facial challenge of a given statute is established in United States v. Salerno. The court pays lip service to Salerno at the beginning of its analysis on the “likelihood of success on the merits,â€

Originally Posted by onetrickydude

Why the hell do we allow this? I knew this judge would be bought off by this administration! This administration and Barry Obama is guilty of treason! Out right treason! My God the enemy is in our White house!

I am no big follower of Rush Limbaugh, but he called this one right down to the wire. Liberal judge.....liberal decision. He also says the 9th circuit court of appeals will be a joke. This thing is headed to the supreme court....and hopefully (if no one dies between now and then) there will be a 5 - 4 decision.....providing of course, the cultural muslim, doesn't declare Marshall Law and then all bets are off.

Hey Judge Susan Bolton!

Can you feel it yet?

YOU ARE GONNA BE SOOOOOOOOO FAMOUS FOR THIS!