Results 1 to 10 of 11
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
06-19-2007, 08:24 AM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- North Carolina
- Posts
- 2,457
Sen. Reid fast-tracks revived immigration bill
Sen. Reid fast-tracks revived immigration bill
Proposal boosts funding by $4.4 billion for border security and workplace enforcement, a Bush-backed provision.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld ... &cset=true
By Maura Reynolds, Times Staff Writer
June 19, 2007
WASHINGTON — Senate leaders Monday relaunched a controversial proposal to overhaul the nation's immigration laws, offering a new version of legislation that faltered earlier this month.
Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) used his prerogatives as majority leader to reintroduce the bill and bypass the usual committee process, putting it on the calendar for quick consideration. A final vote is likely next week.
"I applaud Sen. Reid's action to bring the immigration bill back to the floor and the determination of so many of our colleagues to do the challenging work we were elected to do," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, the bill's leading Democratic proponent.
The new version cleans up the legislation, which had been altered so much in the last year that it had become legislatively unwieldy. It includes a provision, agreed to in principle last week by Senate leaders with the support of President Bush, that would boost funding for border security and workplace enforcement by $4.4 billion.
"Republican obstructionists are going to have a very simple decision to make later on this week," said Jim Manley, Reid's staff director. "Are they going to stand for efforts to provide increased funding for border security along with comprehensive immigration reform? Or are they going to continue to block one of the top priorities of the president?"
The proposal announced Monday will incorporate the substance of about two dozen amendments adopted when the Senate debated the bill for two weeks this year. The core of the legislation has become known as the "grand bargain." Under the plan, opponents agreed to provide many illegal immigrants now in the United States a path to citizenship in return for a restructuring of the immigration system to give greater weight to education and job skills, rather than family ties.
Reid pulled the legislation from the floor June 7 in a dispute with Republicans over how many amendments could be debated. He announced last week that he and GOP leaders had reached an agreement permitting each party to introduce about a dozen more amendments.
The legislation has split the parties internally, creating unusual bipartisan cooperation for and against the bill. Democratic and Republican aides say they believe they have the 60 votes they need to end debate and adopt the bill in the Senate.
To curb opponents' chances of blocking the bill, Reid used a Senate procedure known as Rule 14 to reintroduce and bring the measure immediately to the floor for debate without going through a committee.
Aides said the majority leader was also considering introducing the last two dozen or so amendments in a block, using a controversial maneuver to prevent others from being offered.
"This is a very heavy-handed tactic by the leader that is cutting a large number of senators out of the process, and there is nothing we can do to stop it," complained a senior aide to one of the bill's GOP opponents, who spoke on condition of anonymity in order to speak freely about inter-party disputes.
The fate of the legislation is less certain in the House, whose members have been waiting for the Senate to act before offering their version. Any differences between the bills passed in each chamber would be subject to negotiation.
Last year, House Republicans defeated an immigration bill adopted in the Senate, and it is unclear how many may support the new version.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) has told Bush that unless he can persuade about 70 Republicans to vote for the bill, it will not pass in the chamber.
-
06-19-2007, 09:36 AM #2To curb opponents' chances of blocking the bill, Reid used a Senate procedure known as Rule 14 to reintroduce and bring the measure immediately to the floor for debate without going through a committee.
Aides said the majority leader was also considering introducing the last two dozen or so amendments in a block, using a controversial maneuver to prevent others from being offered.TIME'S UP!
**********
Why should <u>only</u> AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants, have to obey the law?!
-
06-19-2007, 09:42 AM #3
Read my lips...
"Republican obstructionists are going to have a very simple decision to make later on this week," said Jim Manley, Reid's staff director. "Are they going to stand for efforts to provide increased funding for border security along with comprehensive immigration reform? Or are they going to continue to block one of the top priorities of the president?"
Well, for my part, I am going to continue to block this piece of garbage bill. Why is it so hard for the politicians to understand that no matter how much sugar they put on this piece of crap, we know they are trying to feed us crap and we're not going to swallow it.Lunarminer
Thar's gold in that there moon!
-
06-19-2007, 10:12 AM #4
"Republican obstructionists are going to have a very simple decision to make later on this week," said Jim Manley, Reid's staff director. "Are they going to stand for efforts to provide increased funding for border security along with comprehensive immigration reform? Or are they going to continue to block one of the top priorities of the president?"
obstructionists - Not: Just Americans who love American culture and believe that we have immigration laws that should be enforced instead of amnesty for millions of criminals and a NAU for a president who believes americans cannot govern themselves.
-
06-19-2007, 10:40 AM #5
Did I hear Kyle on Lou Dobbs say that the additional funding for the security fence is going to come from the penalty's paid by the illegal aliens applying for the Z Visa?
In other words amnesty will be given first before the fence and they may never apply for the Z Visa because the minute Bush signs the bill, everything they want will be available to them. They will be legal and can move freely back and forth from their Homeland.
Why would they ever want to pay 5,000. and go through the procedures, which I don't believe are enforceable. They couldn't even proceed with the passports in the alloted time. So they waved that rule.
Don't believe their lying eyes or mouths, not for a minute.
Block this traitor called the president, small p.
-
06-19-2007, 10:54 AM #6Republican obstructionists
I want a t-shirt, in red, white and blue which says...
INDEPENDENT OBSTRUCTIONIST...
and on the back
AND PROUD AMERICAN...or PROUD OF IT!
Boy, I wish I wasn't graphically challenged!TIME'S UP!
**********
Why should <u>only</u> AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants, have to obey the law?!
-
06-19-2007, 11:14 AM #7
I don't understand how they can do this as the house is the only one who can appropriate funds, they hold the purse!!
.................................................. .................................................. .......
"IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT!"
...............................Check out this link everyone!!.................................
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=68894
LETS SAVE OUR COUNTRY FROM THIS INVASION! We need everone envolved even you LOOKIE LOU'S yes you come on CALLS, FAXES AND E-MAILS TO OUR SENATORS!!
INSTRUCTIONS AND POSTING THREAD LINK BELOW!
Leave posts so we know what they are saying!
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=69158
ALL CONTACT INFORMATION.....Senators, news, radio, ETC.
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=68216Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)
-
06-19-2007, 11:29 AM #8
SOSAD,
house is the only one who can appropriate funds, they hold the purse!!
OMG, NOW you want the lawbreakers ( lawmakers) to KNOW THE CONSTITUTION?!
SOSAD...whenever will you be satisfied? Hmmmmm??????
TIME'S UP!
**********
Why should <u>only</u> AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants, have to obey the law?!
-
06-19-2007, 11:35 AM #9Originally Posted by curiouspat
I WILL BE SATISFIED WHEN THE BILL S1348 IS DEAD!! THAT IS UNTIL THEY BRING UP ANOTHER BILL TO CRAM DOWN OUR THROAT!Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)
-
06-19-2007, 01:41 PM #10SORRY CURIOUS, I RUN AMUCK AGAIN, WHAT COULD I BE THINKING!! THEIR POLITICIANS!
I WILL BE SATISFIED WHEN THE BILL S1348 IS DEAD!! THAT IS UNTIL THEY BRING UP ANOTHER BILL TO CRAM DOWN OUR THROAT!
And when they try again...I just hope they're smart enough to have learned, WE'RE NOT GOING AWAY!TIME'S UP!
**********
Why should <u>only</u> AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants, have to obey the law?!
NEW Greg Reese (5/14/2024): UN Troops Being Brought in as...
05-14-2024, 09:25 PM in Videos about Illegal Immigration, refugee programs, globalism, & socialism